Rauf
-
Posts
1304 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Rauf
-
-
No globals for vantage? Not a favorite of mine but seems people love it. Also it brings one more use for amd platform. If you remove globals for FSX and FSU then you need amd only for one benchmark (normal FS). Yes, it may be just for now, but it kind of sucks that you need to get an expensive platform to be competivie for just one 3d benchmark. The cpu test in vantage is kind of interesting also, and I think it might continue to be so in the future also.
3d11 is a good benchmark. Good to keep globals for it.
Fire strikes, not sure. Fire Strike is kind of buggy. Extreme and ultra are less buggy and have less fps so they are better 3d benchmarks. Maybe choose X or U instead of normal. Or two, or all three...
3D01, sad to say this but I don't see activity here. I may just share my tweak if we can get people benching it again. Then you don't need xp so it will be easier for future also. Otherwise we need some legacy 3D. 05 or/and 03 maybe?
GPUPI, yes 1B is too short. But 32B is a little long for that high constant load. Will waste ln2 like nothing else. May blow vrms etc also...
Catzilla is long time eol. Can't even install it without a certain method. Requires paid version also and not sure if you even can buy it.
Superposition, don't need both in my opinion. Not so much of a diff between 1080p extreme and 8k opti.
Time Spy i think is the best 3d,so yes keep it. Extreme is so much a cpu benchmark with ultra expensive cpus so good not to add it.
Port Royal, yes ofc.
VRmark, does anyone bench it?
-
-
-
Btw, I wonder why it is so strong in FS but not so strong in TS etc. Compared to other benchmarks and games it seems unnaturally strong in FS.
-
-
-
-
I voted not another cinebench, but I guess if it is added a fixed time would be interesting. But maybe a shorter time. Sure 3D benchmarks are a few minutes long but at least you can watch the "game" and not just stare at the termometer
Also I guess which instructions are used matters. AVX? As I understand it AVX is still kind of a cpu killer.
-
1
-
-
-
-
Very interesting score. Seems amd score way low in gpu tests. Looking at some 3090 scores the pattern is the same. Will be interesting to see if it can be fixed somehow.
-
1
-
-
Very nice clocks for non xoc card!
-
-
Where is the hairdryer? Great score!
-
-
-
Strong legacy scaling on your chip! Wish I had one like that!
-
-
Wrong category, FS extreme...
-
I'll take the evbot
-
2 minutes ago, unityofsaints said:
What's your binning method? Have 5x 980 and 2x 980ti here and ambient binning didn't tell me jack sh*t
Only way to bin Maxwell is on LN2. But Asic is aqtually a decent indicator. lower than 70 means they are likely to scale with volts. 80 or higher are likely to be decently strong at low volts but will hit a wall and not respond to voltage. Cards I have tried in the middle 70-range have been pretty bad. This card is a 79,5 and actually not very good. Max 2000 core in Fire strike.
-
1
-
-
Sad to hear. Hope they can find a solution. But, if there is a problem doing business, it's usually because someone wants there to be a problem...
-
1
-
3
-
-
-
2D Benchmark proposal list for 2021
in HWBOT 2021 Edition
Posted
Pcmark? Never tried it, are they "safe" or will they scale immensively with super raid configs etc?
R15 will be missed, but I guess it is a little fast on current high end platforms.
No idea how ycruncher works but it is AVX right? Needs lots of mem also?
I would like to see some 3dmark cpu test added to globals. Sad that time spy does not really scale with core anymore cause it's a good mem intensive benchmark. 3d11 cpu is also good cpu/mem benchmark, maybe an option? Have been tried in competitions and works well. Time Spy Extreme cpu test could also be an option.