Rauf
-
Posts
1304 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Rauf
-
-
-
-
-
1 hour ago, unityofsaints said:
Nice concept, finally a reason max. out GPUs even if you don't have the big $$ CPUs ?
Both these benchmarks scale very much with CPU freq, on newer GPUs at least. So that part won't make any difference as you currently need 12900K for both good GPU and CPU score...
-
Keep up the good 3D work! Time to take the GPU cold also!
-
1
-
-
All sold, thanks for space.
-
Last chance on last 5.3 chip. Will be sold on swedish market tomorrow!
-
Need the 2 good tray chips gone. 5.3 R20 for less than random new one...
600€ shipped within EU.
-
1
-
-
Really good efficiency! New drivers help much?
-
1
-
-
Work that USB :)
-
Nice chip! 1.96V actual voltage? :)
-
Retail sold. Price drop on the two tray chips. 650€ shipped eu
Also has one slightly worse tray, 5.2ghz. 550€ shipped eu
-
3x 12900K that are quite a bit better than average retails. 2x tray chips (X batch) and one retail KF (V batch). All do R20 at 5.3GHz between 1.26 to 1.28V die sense.
Price: 700€ shipped within EU
paypal or bank transfer, buyer pays paypal fees
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, 1whiteshark1 said:
I was honestly expecting an even bigger gain from that
I have been trying to beat your backup but so far no luck. Does your card get cb/cs from new CUDA?Yes, cs with "new" drivers. Anything newer than 37X or 38X has cs
-
Nice, never got 01 running on Asus boards the last two gens...
-
Cuda 11 FTW :) but let's see what my USB can bring...
-
Wow, very strong!
-
1
-
-
Guys at hardwareluxx have been doing a really great job getting the most out of these cards. But there is also some discussion about something that is not quite right, see last post here: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/radeon-rx-6000-3dmark-time-spy-rangliste.1294520/page-52#post-28804684
I don't know what is going on really, would be great if anyone from HWL could clarify.
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
I think I have mentioned it before, but I like the idea of just making the rankings % of top score. First place is 100%, and then every following score just gets the percentage of the top score. It's extremely simple to code and you never have to recalculate entire rankings, except when a new top score is posted. Should make for a much lower server load. You can also reduce your opponents points by uploading a better top score.
For the unpopular rankings there could be dividers, like 75% if less than 100 subs, 50% if less than 50 etc. HW points could also be handled by dividers it you want globals to be worth more like it is today. Top score on HW points would be 100 divided by 2 for example. And then also add additional divider if less than X subs.
-
2
-
-
I think this is way better than the current system. The current where you go from 150 for first place to 75 for third is just absurd.
What will the scaling be for hw points? Can't give high hw points for rankings without a decent amount of subs...
[FS] DDR5 Hynix 7000 C30
in Sold
Posted
Two sets of Kingston Fury 16GBx2 6000C40.
Doing well OC wise, with very tight subtimings as you can see from mem score. All air of course.
Kit 1: 7000MHz C30-40-40-28. Failed 7070MHz, did not test anything in between. 550€
Kit 2: 6933MHz C30-40-40-28. Failed 7000MHz, did not test anything in between. 500€
Selling to EU primarily. Bank transfer, F&F or buyer pays paypal fees.