Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

denvys5

Members
  • Posts

    52
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Location
    Ukraine

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

denvys5's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

31

Reputation

  1. I'm not sure this contest will be only about IMC luck. I'm expecting a lot of research and experimentations into boards, bios, different sticks and windows, for these stages.
  2. CountryCup 2022 stage discussion on hwbot's discord I'd suggest if we have either single core stages, or multicore with per core scores. Since for mem there are not a lot of options, valid and pyprime. Yeah, lets do the hell challenge, valid on TR4 ? A thing to note, I want to hear a clear definition, is the compo intendent for "no rules, best score", or more focused on the efficiency of scores, with cpu clock or cooling limitations. Maybe something funky, like, fastest zen1 pyprime with tRCD=20 and max cpu freq 4000
  3. That old CCL does not support Cezanne. IIRC Vermeer too (correct me if I'm wrong). But it worked perfectly with Zen2 chips. Including per-core OC. https://hwbot.org/submission/4848296_denvys5_superpi___1m_ryzen_5_3600_8sec_400ms
  4. If no restrictions, not a lot of diversity, 6gig ln2 all subs (and 5g+- ambient) If split into specific generations, it may become interesting.
  5. They are linked. On most boards. But, there are exceptions: Crosshair X370 Crosshair X470 Those boards have a feature to unlink bclk from cpu ref. clock and clock them separately. Cpuz registers one tied to cpu. It is easy to check manually in cpuz valid, attention to memory clock. 120mhz should be doable on most boards, with unlocked specific bios options (to disable the chipset ), so the only other option become boards with external bclk that do not have 120mhz limit (no idea which would fit here, C8 maybe? giga x470?)
  6. true ref. clock, or cpu ref clock? If true ref., sounds bad, we have no way to distinguish it from cpu ref clock (cpuz shows cpu ref clock on AM4) and we will see a lot of 120mhz results, once everybody figures it out. If cpu ref clock, boards with external bclk AND ref. clock target switch (for example, crosshair 6 and 7) will dominate the stage, which also doesn't sound great.
  7. If restriction is done by core lineup (like in the description), not generation, then we can do Cezanne+Vermeer+Matisse+Renoir+ for example Summit Ridge. That way, nobody needs to use BristolRidge
  8. Suggestion: IGPU DDR5 - ban Steamdeck/other custom handheld consoles. Steamdeck in particular is stronk in igpu, and is kinda rare (due to high demand).
  9. Yes, we understand that this is only "demo" and it is nowhere near final. We just give feedback on its current state. Yes, that is good for health of the system. But it is important to control hardware grinding, which may impact competitiveness of some ranking systems (hw-masters for example). *User* starts benching new platform = good. *User* does good scores and gets rewarded for that = good. *User* subs popular platform in stock and gets rewarded by a lot = not good. *User* subbing 100500 systems in stock to gain hw-masters position = bad. Just an example of a problem, which didn't exist with current system, but may emerge with new one. Rewarding low scores is ok, but reward shouldnt be too much in relation to actual top-scores. 1155 is good example of that, but we, currently, cant propose solution that would be good for all parties, including performance impact on bot Yes, that is what we like about this new system the most ?
×
×
  • Create New...