denvys5

Please add Gigabyte B650I AX https://valid.x86.fr/pcc1qg

There is no menu button rendered at 1200px. The issue appears on 1200p portrait monitors And at 1201px the whole page would render in a desktop format So, the request is, please, shift the transition of mobile-desktop view to 1200px (maybe even lower, for portrait 1080p users)

Well done

y-cruncher BBP hasn't seen a competition appearence,... yet 😋 Maybe, AVX512 stuff for y-cruncher BBP-100B stage? 8-core, any cpu, 3 subs? (11900K, 7820X, 12900K, R9-9700X sound viable) Probably, would be Intel-centered stage, since most of the viable cpus are Intel by default

Why would you ban 1600-8C if it doesn't bring any advantage with 3 score stage? Optimal setup is 2700, 2700X and 1800X or 2700 Pro, or smth. I'd sub 1600-8C since I dont have other 8 core chips on hand 😋

Yo, thats a big one

Yeah, 11xx BM is great. I even stopped doing proper Waza, this score is pure BM tweaks

Gave up after 5x NotExactInRound with 1T, worked out good regardless https://hwbot.org/submission/5558771_denvys5_superpi___32m_ryzen_5_5600_5min_41sec_289ms

Congrats mate

W10 🤪 Sams Gdie 2800 10-12-14-16 Sticks can do better, board is limitting

Wow!

I'm not sure this contest will be only about IMC luck. I'm expecting a lot of research and experimentations into boards, bios, different sticks and windows, for these stages.

CountryCup 2022 stage discussion on hwbot's discord I'd suggest if we have either single core stages, or multicore with per core scores. Since for mem there are not a lot of options, valid and pyprime. Yeah, lets do the hell challenge, valid on TR4 ? A thing to note, I want to hear a clear definition, is the compo intendent for "no rules, best score", or more focused on the efficiency of scores, with cpu clock or cooling limitations. Maybe something funky, like, fastest zen1 pyprime with tRCD=20 and max cpu freq 4000

Guys, this was a joke, calm down, chill ?

PM for 1x 780ti and 690

That old CCL does not support Cezanne. IIRC Vermeer too (correct me if I'm wrong). But it worked perfectly with Zen2 chips. Including per-core OC. https://hwbot.org/submission/4848296_denvys5_superpi___1m_ryzen_5_3600_8sec_400ms

If no restrictions, not a lot of diversity, 6gig ln2 all subs (and 5g+- ambient) If split into specific generations, it may become interesting.

They are linked. On most boards. But, there are exceptions: Crosshair X370 Crosshair X470 Those boards have a feature to unlink bclk from cpu ref. clock and clock them separately. Cpuz registers one tied to cpu. It is easy to check manually in cpuz valid, attention to memory clock. 120mhz should be doable on most boards, with unlocked specific bios options (to disable the chipset ), so the only other option become boards with external bclk that do not have 120mhz limit (no idea which would fit here, C8 maybe? giga x470?)

true ref. clock, or cpu ref clock? If true ref., sounds bad, we have no way to distinguish it from cpu ref clock (cpuz shows cpu ref clock on AM4) and we will see a lot of 120mhz results, once everybody figures it out. If cpu ref clock, boards with external bclk AND ref. clock target switch (for example, crosshair 6 and 7) will dominate the stage, which also doesn't sound great.

If restriction is done by core lineup (like in the description), not generation, then we can do Cezanne+Vermeer+Matisse+Renoir+ for example Summit Ridge. That way, nobody needs to use BristolRidge

Suggestion: IGPU DDR5 - ban Steamdeck/other custom handheld consoles. Steamdeck in particular is stronk in igpu, and is kinda rare (due to high demand).

8G club ?

3800 RAM FTW!

8G master ?

Yes, we understand that this is only "demo" and it is nowhere near final. We just give feedback on its current state. Yes, that is good for health of the system. But it is important to control hardware grinding, which may impact competitiveness of some ranking systems (hw-masters for example). *User* starts benching new platform = good. *User* does good scores and gets rewarded for that = good. *User* subs popular platform in stock and gets rewarded by a lot = not good. *User* subbing 100500 systems in stock to gain hw-masters position = bad. Just an example of a problem, which didn't exist with current system, but may emerge with new one. Rewarding low scores is ok, but reward shouldnt be too much in relation to actual top-scores. 1155 is good example of that, but we, currently, cant propose solution that would be good for all parties, including performance impact on bot Yes, that is what we like about this new system the most ?