Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

websmile

Administrators
  • Posts

    5824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    58

Posts posted by websmile

  1. Finally something reasonable...

     

    P.S You have to rethink the voltage - sure, you are expert so you should know that each chip has own vid, sacling and so on, one chip dies at 1,65, other live at 1,8v. And if you have no sign of this on LN2 ( on air you see heat, benchmark fail and so on) but the benchmark runs 24 hours (exaggereted) without signs of weakness, it is really hard to find volts that work and don´t kill aka find dead chip next day. In the end, this means you toss a coin or you don´t bench it on LN2 at all. This is the problem we talk about.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  2. Up for sale are two working DDR4-G.Skill B-die kits because I need cash ? - prices are meant to go and are not negotiable :)

    20181207_153653ttfyn.jpg

    1. 2x16GB G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4-3866C18-18-18-38 1.35v

    Excellent kit, does 3866c16 up to 4133 c18 1,35v for me even with tightended subs. Like new (October 2018), dual sided B-die, actual cheapest price in stock at geizhals.at is 550 euros.

    20181207_153705cyfbb.jpg 3866c1632gb32mvhcmn.jpg

    2. 2x8GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-4000 C18-19-19-38 1,35v

    Decent B-die kit, tested for DDR4-4240+ 12-11 Geekbench3 and XTU, 4266 boots and works for some benchmarks but without tuning gb3 did not work. Used in box, august 2017.

    20181207_1537194di6b.jpg 4000c18gtz1733422312-0ze9c.jpg 4000c18gtz1733420012-h6ibq.jpg

    Prices

    1. 365 Euros+shipping sold at ebay.de

    2. 290 Euros+shipping sold to Nik

    Payment with paypal (buyer covers fees or gift payment) or bank transfer, shipping will be done with deutsche Post worlldwide and be 15-20 Euros

     

     

  3. a 2700x ryzen az 5,6ghz can beat a 7820x and 9900k at same frequency on Cinebench15, often ryzen is even more efficient on this - a 4,8ghz 9900k or 7820k beats the same 5,6ghz ryzen 2700x easily at x265 1080p.... I do not criticze the benchmark itself, but your argumentation about avx not being that important and load being same as cinebench. Every test I made was different, everyone I talk to about this tells this is different and x265 draws a lot more power on Intel new systems than cb15, needs more volts for same frequency and put higher load. On the 2700x vs 7820x or 9900k comparison, you can look up results at database here. I also have to say this problem is lot worse on 4K than 1080p, but this doesn´t change things

    • Like 1
  4. @havliApart from the topic to run x265 or not, you want to tell me that a non avx benchmark like cb15 draws same wattage like an avx benchmark like x265? And the heat generated even at running it 25 seconds maybe like cb15, which is much higher, falls from the sky? This is like telling people prime with avx is same like prime without avx enabled, and I wonder why I need a lot more vcore for same frequency... Just tested it again with 7600k, cinebench 15 takes at least same time like 1080p on the system but power drawn is clearly higher on x265.

    • Thanks 1
  5. 2 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

    That's the point of the revision, to simplify the code so that it actually works

    Been there, done that - rev6 to rev7 should do same on server load to make hwbot more reliable and responsive by changing algorythm and way points are calculated so we have a reliable ranking system. You invest time, manpower and cash or it won´t work, that´s the simple truth

×
×
  • Create New...