Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

chuchnit

Members
  • Posts

    129
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by chuchnit

  1. hehe backup wars!! Great benching Brian. I can't wait to see what the max freq that CPU will bench 01 is.
  2. I like what you did there. No cooling limitations but you filtered down to ~ clocks within your cooling. I'll have to start doing that.
  3. Great run but don't kill that poor thing on wprime!
  4. Nice run Brian! The question is where do your backups stop?
  5. Nice result Massman! I really wanted to run some more 32m with the clarky, but the inlaws needed a PC more than I needed a toy. On mine either the IMC was getting wore out and having trouble in dual channel or the board itself was crapping out. I was having problems with stock clocks on the inlaw's rig until I bumped some voltages for it to cold boot in dual channel. Too bad sandy bridge is around the corner or I'd try for another setup and play this game with ya.
  6. Dom nice run mate. Please try cat 10.3 & 10.4 next time.
  7. Sick run Rom! Looks like OCA domination on this stage.
  8. I always show the memory timings tab. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever submitted without the mobo tab either. I'm not trying to single anyone/team out here, but I remember this score from when it was posted up. (crazy score) I'm sure you'll find a lot more in the database. Massman is this screen sufficient? I know these runs have ORB links, but with the new screenshot rule will these screens cut it? I mean moving foward. I know you won't block old runs for a new rule. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1016811_kingpin_3dmark2001_se_2x_geforce_gtx_275_140080_marks
  9. Either way for me. I am now benching on a 17" screen so MB tabs are going to be a little harder to fit but I can manage. I usually try and include it anyway though. Always have. I would like to see the CPUZ memory tab mandatory. Not the SPD tab, but the timings tab. I thought it was until I saw a few top10 subs without it.
  10. Way to go Dent. I can't wait for 3D action!!
  11. Finally got you a good one. Is that the limit for uncore with triple channel?
  12. Tear it up man. Still my favorite bench.
  13. If FM will give hwbot the validation info, could it be possible that hwbot could dive deeper into the .3dr file for validation? This could eliminate some of the crying about hw sharing if the validation went as deep as FM did during the MSI comp. Just go that deep into all validations.
  14. Nice IMC too!! You gonna bust through 440 kay tonight?
  15. rofl, its gonna be hard to top that video!
  16. Gotcha I really wish you had a classified 4-way to throw in the mix.
  17. Oh no, Massman opened a can of worms. Didn't you say before that your sample UD9 was a way early sample?
  18. That's fine actually because I think we all know cpu clocks aren't going to vary that much on single stage or ln2 from board to board. I am more curious if say you tune each setup to its max on each board. I mean subs, RTL's, pcie, uncore; etc. I know you are busy so its not a big deal if you can't find the time. I am just wondering if we see one clearly stand out without all things being equal?
  19. Massman, how much bribing would it take to get you to compare UD9 vs RE3 + Xpander at max clocks on ln2? I'd like to see if the efficiency delta is the same at max clocks. I know Duex says he can pull off 2 RTL tighter on UD9 than Classified 4-way. I'm just wondering if the results are the same when both boards are optimized to the max. In other words, all things not being equal.
×
×
  • Create New...