
chuchnit
Members-
Posts
129 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by chuchnit
-
Clarkdale, SS and PI32M (DDR3-2280CL8 32M)
chuchnit replied to Massman's topic in General overclocking
I like what you did there. No cooling limitations but you filtered down to ~ clocks within your cooling. I'll have to start doing that. -
phil - Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 6418MHz - 2sec 500ms wPrime 32m
chuchnit replied to geobot24's topic in Result Discussions
Great run but don't kill that poor thing on wprime! -
Clarkdale, SS and PI32M (DDR3-2280CL8 32M)
chuchnit replied to Massman's topic in General overclocking
Nice result Massman! I really wanted to run some more 32m with the clarky, but the inlaws needed a PC more than I needed a toy. On mine either the IMC was getting wore out and having trouble in dual channel or the board itself was crapping out. I was having problems with stock clocks on the inlaw's rig until I bumped some voltages for it to cold boot in dual channel. Too bad sandy bridge is around the corner or I'd try for another setup and play this game with ya. -
I always show the memory timings tab. As a matter of fact I don't think I have ever submitted without the mobo tab either. I'm not trying to single anyone/team out here, but I remember this score from when it was posted up. (crazy score) I'm sure you'll find a lot more in the database. Massman is this screen sufficient? I know these runs have ORB links, but with the new screenshot rule will these screens cut it? I mean moving foward. I know you won't block old runs for a new rule. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1016811_kingpin_3dmark2001_se_2x_geforce_gtx_275_140080_marks
-
Either way for me. I am now benching on a 17" screen so MB tabs are going to be a little harder to fit but I can manage. I usually try and include it anyway though. Always have. I would like to see the CPUZ memory tab mandatory. Not the SPD tab, but the timings tab. I thought it was until I saw a few top10 subs without it.
-
Dentlord - Core i7 980X @ 6214MHz - 2sec 593ms wPrime 32m
chuchnit replied to Patch's topic in Result Discussions
Way to go Dent. I can't wait for 3D action!! -
Splave - Core i7 980X @ 6320MHz - 6sec 437ms SuperPi
chuchnit replied to steponz's topic in Result Discussions
Nice Splave!! -
steponz - Radeon HD 5870 @ 1404/1301MHz - 435185 marks Aquamark
chuchnit replied to DOM.'s topic in Result Discussions
Nice run buddy!! Happy Bday! -
Way to go Patch!!
-
If FM will give hwbot the validation info, could it be possible that hwbot could dive deeper into the .3dr file for validation? This could eliminate some of the crying about hw sharing if the validation went as deep as FM did during the MSI comp. Just go that deep into all validations.
-
Splave - GeForce GTX 480 @ 1050/1200MHz - 439780 marks Aquamark
chuchnit replied to Patch's topic in Result Discussions
Nice IMC too!! You gonna bust through 440 kay tonight? -
rofl, its gonna be hard to top that video!
-
Gotcha I really wish you had a classified 4-way to throw in the mix.
-
Oh no, Massman opened a can of worms. Didn't you say before that your sample UD9 was a way early sample?
-
That's fine actually because I think we all know cpu clocks aren't going to vary that much on single stage or ln2 from board to board. I am more curious if say you tune each setup to its max on each board. I mean subs, RTL's, pcie, uncore; etc. I know you are busy so its not a big deal if you can't find the time. I am just wondering if we see one clearly stand out without all things being equal?
-
Massman, how much bribing would it take to get you to compare UD9 vs RE3 + Xpander at max clocks on ln2? I'd like to see if the efficiency delta is the same at max clocks. I know Duex says he can pull off 2 RTL tighter on UD9 than Classified 4-way. I'm just wondering if the results are the same when both boards are optimized to the max. In other words, all things not being equal.