Crew Vivi Posted January 8, 2015 Crew Share Posted January 8, 2015 So, does it mean only valid DDR4 subs would be from those participating in the handful live events during the year or records by vendors with oscilloscopes?How would you know some random guy didn't tweakthe registers if he didn't bench live or has no oscilloscope? yes currently no good way to prove it other than live or with scope. So until someone figures out a legit way to measure the frequency non-bugged we will need to do it this way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 8, 2015 Author Share Posted January 8, 2015 So, does it mean only valid DDR4 subs would be from those participating in the handful live events during the year or records by vendors with oscilloscopes?How would you know some random guy didn't tweakthe registers if he didn't bench live or has no oscilloscope? Sadly enough, that's the situation we're currently in. Even the oscilloscope verification presents some issues we haven't faced before. I think live will be the only way forward in this case ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Planet Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 No, we checked all the scores and the results were done at a live environment. FYI, this is what was written in the article: "For memory frequency validation records it seems obvious we must rely on additional verification by means of the oscilloscope, or at live events by verifying correct functioning of the motherboards prior to the record attempts" So why was Cookies score removed previously when he ran without a scope? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.