X-Tripiot Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 real clocks 785/750 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0lsty Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 4eetinnggg .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0lsty Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 530/515 - not 785/750 ... show us orb valid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X-Tripiot Posted October 16, 2010 Author Share Posted October 16, 2010 530/515 - not 785/750 ... show us orb valid please don't start,, you're 6600 screens doesn't shows it either give me an 2001 serial number and ill validate it http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/6429/20101016003.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) give me an 2001 serial number and ill validate it You don't need a serial number to validate a score with 3DMark01 on Futuremark Edited January 15, 2011 by Christian Ney Wou => You Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 real clocks 785/750 Why does GPU-Z show 530/515 then? I don't remember any problems with software diagnostics on 6600 GTs...And 258.96 is not LOD-friendly in general. Whithout that boost you won't hit 50k at all. 'll check LODs on that driver on 6600 GT today. Just interesting -) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Why is your result shown above valid and the other not? Please explain further T0lsty I am most interested in understanding why your result which shows stock clocks for the graphic card is good but the one by X-Tripiot is not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted October 16, 2010 Crew Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) Me too 1Day, request new sreen last night because the resolution was hidden, my decision to request new screen and now he do it . (X- Tripiot : Run again - new screen) Also in the 3DMark'05 is the ORB and I see no problem, the lack of resolution is because the test was run without a key(default setting), so this would be Ok. I'm really interested in knowing why Thanks Sw Edited October 16, 2010 by Sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0lsty Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Why is your result shown above valid and the other not? Please explain further T0lsty I am most interested in understanding why your result which shows stock clocks for the graphic card is good but the one by X-Tripiot is not? now we are talking not about my result . report it . all my screens are correct. except 01 mark. because after some time video dont go in 3d mode . and the test was run in 2d . 2d clock on gpu was 790. and 3d was stock because i dont touch it. but mem freq was ok. if my submission would be deleted - i have 100% correct backup at 49k . and now about X-Tripiot - is it hart to do right screen?? none of your submissions are ok. just read rules and show us all info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 now we are talking not about my result . report it .all my screens are correct. except 01 mark. because after some time video dont go in 3d mode . and the test was run in 2d . 2d clock on gpu was 790. and 3d was stock because i dont touch it. but mem freq was ok. if my submission would be deleted - i have 100% correct backup at 49k . As per your request submission is now under review. Thank you for assisting staff in this matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0lsty Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 nice work) my resut was blocked , and this wasnt ? nice , nice .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TiN Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 1Day Comment better this CPU-Z validation. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1434754 Can you see there TWO cards? I can run SLI, get result, disable SLI and make screenies with WTs C'mon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 nice work)my resut was blocked , and this wasnt ? nice , nice .. May I suggest you read the report that was included with your result being temporarily suspended from being included for points. And the pm I sent to you before I suspended the result. Not blocked just suspended. And second it would have been so much easier if when you report a result that you state the reason why you are reporting it. TiN - thank you that is exactly what was needed. Now the result can be placed in the correct category - dual GPU class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Hey 1Day, it's a kind of new fair play system at hwbot? Are you the one from new moderators? You blocked one result because you don't like the GPU clock speed (nominal). But above here is another score, the same situation. And it is OK. Probably you should block TWO, ha? Or should we talk to other moderators about the behavior difference from HWBOT stuff? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 TiN - thank you that is exactly what was needed. Unfortunately it still has to be proven. The best way is that X-Tripiot gave us another valid link (as he already did for 05 & 06 marks, but still dod not for 03), IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Hey 1Day, it's a kind of new fair play system at hwbot? Are you the one from new moderators?You blocked one result because you don't like the GPU clock speed (nominal). But above here is another score, the same situation. And it is OK. Probably you should block TWO, ha? Or should we talk to other moderators about the behavior difference from HWBOT stuff? No it was not me who gave the OK for the result that was other moderator - one who has been moderator for long time, but the result it has been changed to dual card by me. I do not think that any results need to be blocked actually I think they are both OK for the different class they are in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 Unfortunately it still has to be proven. The best way is that X-Tripiot gave us another valid link (as he already did for 05 & 06 marks, but still dod not for 03), IMHO. That is a valid point about the 03 result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) 1day Comment Better This Cpu-z Validation. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1434754 Can You See There Two Cards? I Can Run Sli, Get Result, Disable Sli And Make Screenies With Wts C'mon. Owned , GG TiN Edited October 16, 2010 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 But as he has got valid link and legit gold cups for 1x GPU. We have to think about. I don't know if there is a way to edit the validation file, but.... In Aquamark and 3DM01 having SLI, don't improve a lot the score. So imo, his results seems good, as he can get golds in 3DM05, 3DM06. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 That is true Christian - submissions can only be approved based on the information (validation) that is provided. So we have proof for some of the results and they are equal to Gold Cups. The others submission that do not have validation can not be given the credit that they might be due. It is sad but there is nothing one can do without legit validation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 (edited) That is true Christian - submissions can only be approved based on the information (validation) that is provided. So we have proof for some of the results and they are equal to Gold Cups. The others submission that do not have validation can not be given the credit that they might be due. It is sad but there is nothing one can do without legit validation. Yeah he also can have validations files(for 3DM01 and 3DM03) as he has them for 3DM05 and 3DM06. If I am decided to buy 3DMark key, I will share him the 3DM01 and 3DM03 key. Edited October 16, 2010 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I hope that he does have those validation files, it would make life so much easier if he did. Then all the posts in this thread would not have bene needed. And I would not have been pawned so badly by TiN :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted October 16, 2010 Share Posted October 16, 2010 I hope that he does have those validation files, it would make life so much easier if he did. Then all the posts in this thread would not have bene needed. And I would not have been pawned so badly by TiN :D , as I was following this thread on the iphone(I was at a badminton tournament), I havn't had the idea to check his other submissions like his CPU-Z one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonNiger Posted November 8, 2010 Share Posted November 8, 2010 He made a video for youtube about his 05 run (single 6600GT 7754p) but it looks odd. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xBs_fOSbz8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted November 8, 2010 Crew Share Posted November 8, 2010 (edited) Yep, I've seen before, something that caught my attention is the GT3, it is not in full screen ?, Why ? This never happened to me before, running this benchmark This may change the result in this, because it changes the rendering ? can someone explain ? Regards Sw Edited November 8, 2010 by Sweet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.