Posted January 27, 201510 yr Ney blocked me, whaaa http://hwbot.org/submission/2464111_fugger_ucbench_2011_core_i7_4700mq_895.1_mpt_score Compared to... http://hwbot.org/submission/2564439_dennis10_ucbench_2011_core_i7_4800mq_885.5_mpt_score My ram is much tighter and I am sure my OS is leaner :nana: Unblock, thanks. 'impossible score at given settings, possible bug or other'
January 27, 201510 yr Author NM, I see. I don't remember how I got or found those settings, was it default from download?
January 27, 201510 yr Yeah sorry I forgot to put the link in the description field when I blocked the score: http://tiny.cc/UC11_PURGE
January 27, 201510 yr Author I was confused trying to figure out how it was bugged when it was a change in rules.
January 28, 201510 yr Crew I fear Christian is just getting warmed up, he was born to put the OC community on the right track
May 6, 201510 yr Well, UCbench was always producing unreliable results. Each run was different and not slightly, sometimes dramatically. It get to the point, where with higher CPU clocks and tighter ram settings I was unable to beat a competitor, just because he either bugged the score, or run it with 64+ cores to get higher result by luck. Good to see that slowly but surely something is done with this.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.