TASOS Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 I would like to ask the result moderators , if the following result is considered valid. http://hwbot.org/submission/2883832 From what i now , it's been reported. My main concern is about the screenshot used , which according to the benchmark rules , is not correct. http://hwbot.org/news/9037_application_50_rules/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheMadDutchDude Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 To me, I'd have to say no. In order to run on 8 and newer, you absolutely need the newest system info as far as I am aware. That is the rule. I'm not a result moderator though. Someone will be along shortly who is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 It's not only for that reason. The screenshot is not as it should be. Verification screenshot requirements 3DMark benchmark settings 3DMark overall score 3DMark subtest scores CPU-Z CPU tab CPU-Z Memory tab CPU-Z Mainboard tab, if IGP has been used GPU-Z Graphics Card tab (Rivatuner may be used if GPU-Z fails to correctly report the GPU) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunslinger Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Not valid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 10, 2015 Author Share Posted June 10, 2015 (edited) I guess , this is not valid either (for the same reasons as above). Plus the "Time measuring" alert msg. http://hwbot.org/submission/2884568 Edited June 10, 2015 by TASOS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GENiEBEN Posted June 10, 2015 Share Posted June 10, 2015 Invalid, I don't care much it's 4.36, but no subtest scores in the screenshot are a no-no, even with an orb link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 12, 2015 Author Share Posted June 12, 2015 I guess , this is not valid either (for the same reasons as above). Plus the "Time measuring" alert msg. http://hwbot.org/submission/2884568 Bump To take care of this one too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 13, 2015 Author Share Posted June 13, 2015 Testing 1-2 , 1-2 :woot: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 14, 2015 Author Share Posted June 14, 2015 I guess , this is not valid either (for the same reasons as above). Plus the "Time measuring" alert msg. http://hwbot.org/submission/2884568 Still waiting for this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 16, 2015 Author Share Posted June 16, 2015 Hmmm .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted June 19, 2015 Author Share Posted June 19, 2015 Is this case settled ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted June 23, 2015 Share Posted June 23, 2015 Blocked. That's an issue I need to solve asap. I will make verification screenshot example for people who dont buy benchmarks and update the rules one by one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.