stealth Posted May 11, 2008 Posted May 11, 2008 As jmke said the other day "the moderation tool works great and so does reporting use it" http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=19968&postcount=1948 So i did but nothing seems to change. Have a look at this and at the attachment: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732469 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732526 ,these results are in the wrong category,i reported them but still there. He had a 3Dmark03 result in 82845G category which i reported is well and moved by his team captain in to the correct category,but not the Aquamark and 3Dmark06 result.And a 3Dmark05 result which i don't know where is gone. Also my AquaMark results been blocked(see attachement) and as rb explain to me and i accepted that happen due to lack of verification,as he said "For aquamark results submitted after 8 oct 2007 you need to include a gpu-z/rivatuner screenshot" http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=19848&postcount=4 If this rule applies to me should apply to them is well: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=722241 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702058 Nothing has change. I know there is a lot of work for you and you do great job,just want to make sure that you have notice it. Thanks a lot. stealth Quote
r1ch Posted May 12, 2008 Posted May 12, 2008 I have the same view of this. I don't think many results I report have been dealt with. Can someone clear up how we should be reporting results? Also, I have a couple of blocked scores but received no email notifying me of this. I remember this beeing a problem previously - it might be worth checking this out (no spam filter, no free email service - guaranteed personally hosted email address). Thanks Quote
RyderOCZ Posted May 12, 2008 Posted May 12, 2008 I can assure you it works. There are currently over 1300 reported results, you guys just have to be patient Its not like this is life or death Quote
pointhore Posted May 13, 2008 Posted May 13, 2008 I'm glad the report tool works now, but what do we do about a result that has been checked by a moderator and cannot be reported. The main thread for reporting things like this has been "Closed" This one is in the wrong category. It is a mobile processor. Look at the screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635793 Please move it to the correct category. Thanks Quote
stealth Posted May 13, 2008 Author Posted May 13, 2008 A user reported one of my scores(see attachment)the reason was "No image with CPU-Z" which checked by a mod and mark it as an old score,nothing wrong so far. Even if is an old score there is a verification link and by clicking on it you can check if there is or not CPU-Z and if the score is valid,if the link temporary doesn't work you can check it a little later again,then you can report it. http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/6434/superpi32mp4gn9.jpg If you are not sure if a score is valid or not ask someone else in your forum about it. What i am trying to say is that if you try not to report scores that they are valid then the mods will have less work to do and they will be able to check faster scores that must be modarated. All of us must try to make mods life a little easier. stealth Quote
pointhore Posted May 13, 2008 Posted May 13, 2008 why is it a mobile CPU ? It's not a mobile CPU, but it is in the wrong category. It should be in the MP 2600+ TB category here http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1133 Quote
stealth Posted May 14, 2008 Author Posted May 14, 2008 @jmke, I have upload a result a few months ago but it seems it is in the wrong category. This is the result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683169 This is a Pentium 3 550Mhz Katmai and i have uploaded in the Pentium 3 550Mhz slot1 Coppermine,but when i search for P3 550Mhz i get only the Coppermines. Can you please check this result and moved in to correct category if necessary? Thank you. stealth Quote
stealth Posted May 14, 2008 Author Posted May 14, 2008 Thanks a lot, Now i think all my results are correct:) stealth Quote
stealth Posted May 17, 2008 Author Posted May 17, 2008 @jmke, I reported this Aquamark result earlier which hasen't got a GPU-Z/CPU-Z on the screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700172 ,the result has been checked by you and marked as ok. If what rb said i.e."For aquamark results submitted after 8 oct 2007 you need to include a gpu-z/rivatuner screenshot,"doesn't exists any more why my Aquamark results still blocked? What is the difference between this result and my results? stealth Quote
lunatic@98 Posted May 17, 2008 Posted May 17, 2008 new rules update http://www.hwbot.org/hwbot.post.do?postId=872 afte 15.05.08 need you GPUz and CPUz Quote
stealth Posted May 18, 2008 Author Posted May 18, 2008 All fixed i post them in the other thread,i will try to run them again slowly so all to have a correct screenshot but it will take some time,specially for the GMA 865 i have to rebuild the system. I am confuse now,i don't know from which day the new rules start count. Thanks a lot. stealth Quote
stealth Posted May 20, 2008 Author Posted May 20, 2008 Good work,bravo:) Come on guys don't give up must be some more scores left to report:D stealth Quote
doshi Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 Does Report tool still works? Please, look at this one`s "entry modification tool": http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708983 Quote
demiurg Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 doshi This case is on consideration by all moderators Quote
Massman Posted May 21, 2008 Posted May 21, 2008 Does Report tool still works?Please, look at this one`s "entry modification tool": http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708983 Are you sure the first score is out of line? Looking at the third in your ranking, it seems that your SM2 and SM3 runs are a bit too low? Vendeta has a valid FM link, so I'm not really suspecting a cheat here. It's always possible, but I like to follow the non-cheat paths before I follow the others . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.