meiyo Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Meraviglioso-Wonderful-Wunderbar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GRIFF Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Amazing score. Congratulations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sburnolo Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Favorisca i documenti grazie;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apfelkuchen Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Very nice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigioracing Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 first 7sec sub with q6600 ! very good !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest k.pisti Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 That is killer! Congrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrix85 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 ...good bro !!! This pot give you amazing result...lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scannick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 ...good bro !!! This pot give you amazing result...lol Ahahah I forgot this is your pot ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slaske6 Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 hmmm i think this score it is bugd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest k.pisti Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Why do you think that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Was this efficiency (cpu clock * time) consistent or more of a one-off? Three lowest 4.5G+ efficiencies that I know of are 39488 (funsoul, 4833*8.171), 39802 (Ice Angel, 4696*8.475) and 39917 (Maximous, 4546*8.780). Meaning that at 38649 you are more than 2% faster than anybody else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scannick Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 hmmm i think this score it is bugd I have about ten scores under previous 1st place, as you can see, no bugs just a lot of tweaking work, I can do it again and maybe better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest barbonenet Posted January 18, 2016 Share Posted January 18, 2016 (edited) Come one guys! We hard working on our test, and we dont want to share our tweaks! But if u remember my battle with der8auer on i3 540, u can see how was high our efficiency!!! So keep pushing and try to beat scannick! Well done mate;) http://hwbot.org/benchmark/wprime_-_1024m/rankings?start=5&cores=2#start=0#interval=20 i know is the 1024, but we use the same tweaking here and there Edited January 18, 2016 by barbonenet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.