True Monkey Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Blck 106.28 x37= 3,923 Ghz @ 1 core (all core 3,18 GHz) .....4.14 Ghz ??? whats that ??? a new tweak ?? ...??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 (edited) No tweaks. I ran it as normal as I always do (when I can get it to run). Thats the end result. Dont know why XTU shows 4.14 Ghz. If in the end it is deemed a bugged run, I will with out any problem remove it but with proper reasoning and some sort of valid proof . Edited October 17, 2016 by mr.paco Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
True Monkey Posted October 17, 2016 Author Share Posted October 17, 2016 Ok ...i have 109.5 Blck and 5-8-5-20 1T rams and get only 673 marks in XTU Thats what all guys get in this benchmark +- a few points Only you have 100 Points more ? No Chance to get it Sry for my bad English Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted October 17, 2016 Share Posted October 17, 2016 Weren't all teamcup results already checked by a moderator?........except for some dogpile subs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted October 18, 2016 Administrators Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) Is this really an S cpu? I thought it was a 2400 when I saw result because of the 4,1ghz which match this perfectly. Any way cpu can be "unlocked" to 2400 for a weird reason? If not, I would advise to delte the run as bugged, but this is a really weird coincidence, try to re run and check what happens^^ - after the 4/8 3570K we had a while ago and locked 6700ks I saw I will not rule out anything anymore P.S. Would be helpful if you set the result from private to public so I can check the settings Edited October 18, 2016 by websmile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Set from Private to Public. Like I said; I have no issues with deleting/removing the submission if indeed it is a bugged run. It was only questioned because of the screen-shot. and believe me I have no problem with that. If my sub is bugged then it's bugged. BUT there are many many other submissions that XTU shows one speed for CPU and CPUZ shows another (if a screen shot was posted). My actual speed I think was about 3.8Ghz +/- With XTU being a benchmark that no screen shot is required, What if there was no screen-shot? In any event, just let me know if you require me to delete the submission Websmiles. Just want it checked first is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.paco Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Ok ...i have 109.5 Blck and 5-8-5-20 1T rams and get only 673 marks in XTU Thats what all guys get in this benchmark +- a few points Only you have 100 Points more ? No Chance to get it Sry for my bad English Not many guys... Only 4 people ran this CPU with XTU with you that make 5 and 2 of them were at stock speeds. That isnt really enough info to know the true potential of the cpu or the quality of each persons CPU. But I could be wrong... Again And your English is just fine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted October 18, 2016 Administrators Share Posted October 18, 2016 XTU is driving me crazy on older systems- the result matches the MHz, but the MHz don´t match the cpu abilities, you have a spike at monitoring when you check screenshot. Please make another run if you need it for ranking and reomve this result here, after checking all variables it is too much out of line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Sub Deleted. Thanks for checking it out at least Michael. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted October 19, 2016 Administrators Share Posted October 19, 2016 In fact this is a problem I encounter often, if I check cpu categories it is easier to detect because I can cross-check with other subs of same cpu model. If you only check the mhz-points ratio like I did here first, you do not see it on obscure low power cpus for example Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.