February 11, 20178 yr Delete score, it is huge bugged. There is no wonder tweak in 3DM 2006, XP64 + 340.52 driver is a little worse on score that XP + 197.45/LOD15 You don't find the score odd at 970mhz? should never post it, look at others freq and SM3.0 scores.
February 12, 20178 yr I have run this bench 4/5 times to do this result, first was 25850 at 950/1270 @ 6000 cpu...then i run this score at theese frequency! If you think is bugged check the mod.
February 12, 20178 yr Of course it is bugged, you can not get this score at 950/970mhz, probably vga memory is at limit or something. As i say, xp 64/340.52 is no better than xp 32bit. You found a "secret tweak"? ==)), don't think so, as you run 3dmark 2001 with the same driver (very wrong one) Please respect others work, and make a video about your huge score 3DMark 2006 run at 970mhz.
February 12, 20178 yr I use xp64 / 340.52 drivers instead xp32 to try. Mybe it's better for sm3.0 subtest. I not use lod 15x as you saw. If you check cpu score for example TeamAU, it's higher, for only 50mhz difference. I rebench with video OK. For 2001 i know xp64/340.52 it's wrong, but i need install xp32. For sure the result mybe better. I should try. Edited February 12, 20178 yr by Andreat85
February 12, 20178 yr Crew Do NOT change screenshot resolution of the benchmark... Consider this as your first offcial warning!! You know perfectly what you did...
February 12, 20178 yr also his cpu was not running 6 ghz , because cpu score say that is at ~5300 -5400 max ! Edited February 12, 20178 yr by nachtfalke
February 12, 20178 yr I see now, ok for resolution, my monitor TV change it. I rebench correctly, it's right. Cpu frequency is 101x60 set up in bios Nachty.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.