Eisbaer798 Posted November 5, 2018 Share Posted November 5, 2018 Hello everybody, a bench buddy (Gigelz) and I had our P5E3 Premium / WIFI-AP @n motherboards under LN2 this weekend. We used a pretested E8600 CPU from Gigelz. All motherboards were tested with this CPU. First, we tested the motherboards of Gigelz while we have set up a new FSB clock record for the P5E3.http://hwbot.org/submission/3973151_gigelz_reference_frequency_p5e3_premiumwifi_ap_an_682.51_mhz Immediately afterwards we tested my P5E3. At the same time I reached a similar score like Gigelz before with his motherboard. We think that the motherboards did not reach its limit, but the CPU was at its end. But now we ask ourselves if I may upload my result to the Max FSB of the P5E3 motherboard, or if this would count towards the hardware sharing because the same CPU was used. The benchmark is really just about the motherboard and about reaching the best possible FSB. Unfortunately we could not find anything in the list of rules. Here, only the GPU and the CPU are discussed. http://hwbot.org/news/8633_application_21_rules/ and http://hwbot.org/article/general_rules Can someone of the officials please comment on whether or not I can upload my result? Thank you very much and greetings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 5, 2018 Crew Share Posted November 5, 2018 For 2D only motherboard and memory can be shared, if you share a CPU it will not count, only one of you can submit... go for an E8500 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted November 5, 2018 Administrators Share Posted November 5, 2018 So, you share a motherboard at a motherboard benchmark and this is correct? We talk about reference clock here, the mainboard is the factor that is awarded points. The cpu at this case is like memory, used to make the result happen but not what gets points and cups. You are an excellent judge, but maybe you should think about this again... 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisbaer798 Posted November 6, 2018 Author Share Posted November 6, 2018 (edited) Hello websmile, NO we did not use the same motherboard. We tested two different P5E3 from Gigelz and my P5E3 motherboard. In total 3 Boards! The motherboard from Gigelz and mine have different batch numbers (of the NB.) Gigelz two boards have the same batchnumber on the NB and the batchnumber of my board's NB is completely different. We only shared his E8600 CPU because we were sure this CPU allows a high FSB to able testing the NB on the Motherboard. We are fair and honest bencher. Because of this I first post the question about sharing a CPU and did not directly abload my result from the bench. But now I am totally confused…Leeghoofd said it’s not allowed as it’s a 2D bench and now you confirm my point of view. 10 hours ago, websmile said: ...We talk about reference clock here, the mainboard is the factor that is awarded points. The cpu at this case is like memory, used to make the result happen but not what gets points and cups. You are an excellent judge, but maybe you should think about this again... This is my opinion, too. We did a motherboard bench. In this case, the Mainboard is awarding points. Not the CPU. The CPU is like memory, used to make the result happen nothing more! Its similar to bench a big GPU under LN2. I need a Powerful PSU to run the GPU Bench possible. If I don't have a powerful PSU the benchmark will not finish and crash or whatever. Regarding your post it seems to me that everything is within the rules and I may upload my results Sorry for my bad english Edited November 6, 2018 by Eisbaer798 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Leeghoofd Posted November 6, 2018 Crew Share Posted November 6, 2018 opes misread CPU freq :p Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liq_met Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 (edited) Add to the rules how to do sub of frequansy The Pentium MMX and point to it . Shows this C in 55C version cpu-z 1.71 https://hwbot.org/submission/2667353 . Version 1.96 discarded my sub. Thank`s. P.S. hwbot.org/submission/2262181 havli be offended. Edited June 8, 2021 by liq_met Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted June 8, 2021 Crew Share Posted June 8, 2021 1 hour ago, liq_met said: Add to the rules how to do sub of frequansy The Pentium MMX and point to it . https://hwbot.org/rules?referenceId=5258 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liq_met Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) On 6/9/2021 at 3:25 AM, Antinomy said: https://hwbot.org/rules?referenceId=5258 Ok, but im need working version, because "Do not shows this bus frequansy in version cpu-z 1.37 https://hwbot.org/submission/611607_smile_777_cpu_frequency_pentium_mmx_166mhz_238.5_mhz/" You can for me do rename that page https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe/ Add here - beetween tx97 & xe as that https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97-e/ . Edited June 10, 2021 by liq_met Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted June 10, 2021 Crew Share Posted June 10, 2021 12 minutes ago, liq_met said: You can for me do rename that page https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97_xe/ I can. Rename to what? 14 minutes ago, liq_met said: Add here - as that Seems fine to me: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liq_met Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 (edited) Just now, Antinomy said: I can. Rename to what? Seems fine to me: _ not = - Edited June 10, 2021 by liq_met Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted June 10, 2021 Crew Share Posted June 10, 2021 3 minutes ago, liq_met said: _ not = - Why should I put a "_" in it's name? It's called TX97-XE, like it should. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Antinomy Posted June 10, 2021 Crew Share Posted June 10, 2021 21 minutes ago, liq_met said: Ok, but im need working version Here's a working one - you use latest CPU-Z (or CPU-Z vintage) version for submitting frequency reference scores and you back off from peoples old results that aren't obviously bugged. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liq_met Posted July 4, 2021 Share Posted July 4, 2021 If you don't understand then look It https://ibb.co/z6ZF7k7 is necessary to put a sign - in both cases, if you do not understand again, then it is https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tx97-e/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.