don't understand the assignment of points

[NATA 58]

first and second points the others nothing

[Leeghoofd]

That's the issue with the current cut-off system and the reason it will be removed hopefully around end of May. Splave's score is too fast and nr3 is out of the range... so only 1 silly point...

[NATA 58]

all rankings are wrong

[keeph8n]

8 minutes ago, NATA 58 said:

all rankings are wrong

just looks like multiple core counts on the same list.

[Leeghoofd]

Yes, that's normal ranking for all processors for this benchmark. Also the reason why some users are mentioned several times. You have to select the core count you want to compare...  PcMark express does not scale well with core count as I mentioned before in several threads. 

[NATA 58]

this division of points is not possible 1° 77 points. 11°33 poins , 12° 9 points

[Leeghoofd]

There will be a new point distribution system around end of May, this is still the old algorithm that calculates in relation to the fastest result. Meaning that the rest goes down rapidly percentage wise.

We want to get rid of this silly cut-off points implementation, new point system around end of May. I hope it is clear now.

[NATA 58]

all clear. I won't ask any more questions

[klopcha]

Please check. Second place has more points, recalculate doesn't work. Or waiting new system?

https://hwbot.org/benchmark/reference_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=motherboard_3660&cores=#start=0#interval=20

[Leeghoofd]

Its a bug in the calculation algorithm apparently. I will be so happy when we can step away from this monstrocity....

Your score seems too high in relation to the 2nd spot, if I raise the 2nd score to 300 you will get the correct 2.5 points and 2nd spot 1.5 points