unityofsaints Posted December 25, 2021 Share Posted December 25, 2021 Hi, Just to save people time in case they are trying to debug this - no matter what motherboard, O.S., LoD, triple buffer on/off, Nvidia or AMD, clock per clock 3DM03 GT 4 (Nature) is many hundreds of fps down on e.g. 11900K. Just some examples: Same thing with green team: Seems to be architecture-related but any input is welcome of course. Happy Holidays! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speed.fastest Posted December 29, 2021 Share Posted December 29, 2021 I dont know if my score can compared to yours, but seems okay from score side. I dont have rocketlake anymore to compare the score. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted December 29, 2021 Share Posted December 29, 2021 (edited) monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well. Edited December 29, 2021 by Splave Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speed.fastest Posted December 29, 2021 Share Posted December 29, 2021 In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted January 10, 2022 Author Share Posted January 10, 2022 On 12/29/2021 at 6:28 AM, Splave said: monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well. Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 On 12/29/2021 at 6:18 PM, speed.fastest said: In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment. this is good advice 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splave Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 1:16 AM, unityofsaints said: Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen. I think its ddr5 vs ddr4 ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.