December 25, 20214 yr Hi, Just to save people time in case they are trying to debug this - no matter what motherboard, O.S., LoD, triple buffer on/off, Nvidia or AMD, clock per clock 3DM03 GT 4 (Nature) is many hundreds of fps down on e.g. 11900K. Just some examples: Same thing with green team: Seems to be architecture-related but any input is welcome of course. Happy Holidays!
December 29, 20214 yr I dont know if my score can compared to yours, but seems okay from score side. I dont have rocketlake anymore to compare the score.
December 29, 20214 yr monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well. Edited December 29, 20214 yr by Splave
December 29, 20214 yr In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment.
January 10, 20224 yr Author On 12/29/2021 at 6:28 AM, Splave said: monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well. Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen.
January 12, 20224 yr On 12/29/2021 at 6:18 PM, speed.fastest said: In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment. this is good advice
January 21, 20224 yr On 1/10/2022 at 1:16 AM, unityofsaints said: Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen. I think its ddr5 vs ddr4 ?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.