3DM03 Nature suffers massively on Alder Lake vs. previous gens

[unityofsaints]

Hi,

Just to save people time in case they are trying to debug this - no matter what motherboard, O.S., LoD, triple buffer on/off, Nvidia or AMD, clock per clock 3DM03 GT 4 (Nature) is many hundreds of fps down on e.g. 11900K. Just some examples:

Same thing with green team:

Seems to be architecture-related but any input is welcome of course.

Happy Holidays!

[speed.fastest]

I dont know if my score can compared to yours, but seems okay from score side. I dont have rocketlake anymore to compare the score.

[Splave]

monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well.

Edited December 29, 2021 by Splave

[speed.fastest]

In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment.

[unityofsaints]

On 12/29/2021 at 6:28 AM, Splave said:

monitor hz and res the same? maybe someone with ddr4 board can check as well.

Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen.

[Splave]

On 12/29/2021 at 6:18 PM, speed.fastest said:

In my test for 3DMark03 and 05 on Alderlake, score is scaling with core count which is very weird and i never seen this until now on this benchmark. And e core is useless on Windows 7 even on 3DMark11. Try 8c/8t or 8c/16t! it score much higher on 03 and 05, and i still using 60hz monitor. No high refresh rate monitor at the moment.

this is good advice

[Splave]

On 1/10/2022 at 1:16 AM, unityofsaints said:

Yeah if anything the Alder Lake scores are on higher refresh than previous gen.

I think its ddr5 vs ddr4 ?