Cheater likes photoshop

[Pepek86]

http://www.hwbot.org/community/user/RemiKo

User has many scores in category SPI 1M and PiFast which is very similar in appearance

 

For example

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835626

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835421

Screens show the same checksum and subtime but final time is different. Submit in two other cpu category

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860610

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=836144

Screen is the same in every piksel, only final time is diffrent and submit in two cpus

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835625

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835362

Screens is doing in the same time on system Windows and location windows of cpu-z and pifast is also identical

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860629

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=867867

Screens have exactly the same appearance of position windows

 

It's only some examples but he has also other scores which is suspect.

I think moderators should look this

[Narmer]

Thank you Pepek for writing this post because it didn't have time for this.

 

Moderators - please check this results... In my opinion, it deserves to ban user.

[Maxi]

We will look into it.

[71proste]

weird

[knopflerbruce]

I agree that the screens look weird, but he has also published cpuz validations which show that he has CPUs that OC well. Those validations can't be questioned, so... the mods should ask themselves if the CPU that validates at frequency x will be capable of benchmarking at frequency y.

 

And the "setup" of his screens is quite simple so it MAY be easier to reproduce the exact same layout time after time than OP thinks.

 

Btw, nice title. Should I call you cheater, too, if I find the smallest error in one or two submissions??

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835626

Checksum is correct.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835421

Checksum is incorrect

 

Checksum checker - http://www.techpowerup.com/superpi/

[Monstru]

I am not saying anything about this user. But regarding the Checksum checker by TPU, untill everything is official, I would not base any conclusion on it. There are some checksums that are not ok from some serious people, so I think wizzard has to look into that validator some more.

[t0mz0r]

Just a bit OT here.. I notice you're on the same team - shouldn't/couldn't this have been handled internally? *shrugs*

[dinos22]

I am not saying anything about this user. But regarding the Checksum checker by TPU, untill everything is official, I would not base any conclusion on it. There are some checksums that are not ok from some serious people, so I think wizzard has to look into that validator some more.

wha? rly eek

hopefully its just checksum

[dinos22]

lol i just went to check some of the top 20 and the first score from hipro5 doesnt even have checksum in screenshot

it's covered by CPUz screen

 

why would you guys check that and approve it if it doesnt comply with screenshot requirements even though it is George and we know he can be trusted > it still shows a bad example

 

i'm assuming it a slight oversight from all parties

[Pepek86]

Btw, nice title. Should I call you cheater, too, if I find the smallest error in one or two submissions??

Sorry but how can I call someone who consciously modify a score?? Yes you can if I have fake scores but if I have this it is maybay only smallest but no modify a score

 

 

Checksum checker - http://www.techpowerup.com/superpi/

Thanks for cheacking and give the link to checker becouse I don't know about it since extremsystem cheaker break

[knopflerbruce]

Sorry but how can I call someone who consciously modify a score?? Yes you can if I have fake scores but if I have this it is maybay only smallest but no modify a score

 

You THINK it looks that way. But you're not the judge, so let the mods give the "cheater" tag to those who deserve it.

 

And this case isn't as obvious as you think. It's no doubt he has CPUs that may be good enough for #1 in most benchmarks (his CPUZ validations show us that). The times look pretty consistent, too.

[Pepek86]

I'm not judge so I write this topic to watch them by moderators.

And in first post I never said that Remiko is cheater. I write

User has many scores in category SPI 1M and PiFast which is very similar in appearance

... scores which is suspect.

I think moderators should look this

[knopflerbruce]

I'm not judge so I write this topic to watch them by moderators.

And in first post I never said that Remiko is cheater. I write

 

...and the title?

[tiborrr]

lol i just went to check some of the top 20 and the first score from hipro5 doesnt even have checksum in screenshot

it's covered by CPUz screen

 

why would you guys check that and approve it if it doesnt comply with screenshot requirements even though it is George and we know he can be trusted > it still shows a bad example

 

i'm assuming it a slight oversight from all parties

QFT.

 

P.S.: I don't have any tolerance towards photoshopers who post a couple of results of the same CPU in different CPU categories (the most obvious is the AMD K7 league, where you can't really know what model of CPU is used, besides the core revision (T-bird, T-bred, A-bred, Barton, Thorton)). If it was me I would banhammer him!

[knopflerbruce]

The best would be if Hipro was notified about this so he doesn't do the same mistake in the future. There's no reason to flag the submission if it's just a mistake type of error in a screenie that looks legit, especially if the same bencher has posted alot of submissions in the past that no-one ever questioned (which I believe is the case here).

[71proste]

I'm not judge so I write this topic to watch them by moderators.

 

 

You should call me first

Now let mods make a decision

[Monstru]

lol i just went to check some of the top 20 and the first score from hipro5 doesnt even have checksum in screenshot

it's covered by CPUz screen

 

why would you guys check that and approve it if it doesnt comply with screenshot requirements even though it is George and we know he can be trusted > it still shows a bad example

 

i'm assuming it a slight oversight from all parties

 

 

If old George will ever cheat, I will cut my balls and feed them to my dog

[dinos22]

If old George will ever cheat, I will cut my balls and feed them to my dog

 

i am NOT saying he would

i am saying that same rules should apply to old George and me and everyone else

[71proste]

i am NOT saying he would

i am saying that same rules should apply to old George and me and everyone else

 

u r absolutely right

 

hipro's spi 32m doesn't have checksum hmm...not good example especially for top 20

[hipro5]

lol i just went to check some of the top 20 and the first score from hipro5 doesnt even have checksum in screenshot

it's covered by CPUz screen

 

why would you guys check that and approve it if it doesnt comply with screenshot requirements even though it is George and we know he can be trusted > it still shows a bad example

 

i'm assuming it a slight oversight from all parties

 

Ooopppsss....Sorry, I haven't noticed that....

I uploaded my newer one now...

 

 

P.S. I'll smack your arsses if you ever again call me "old" you pervers....

Edited June 28, 2009 by hipro5

[dinos22]

P.S. I'll smack your arsses if you ever again call me "old" you pervers....

 

ROFL hehehe

 

 

nice time and bloody nice CPU

will someone ban George from HWbOT...this CPU is tooooo good hahaha j/k

 

:celebration:

[Monstru]

Young hipro at it again

[71proste]

ROFL hehehe

 

 

will someone ban George from HWbOT

 

I can take his cpu

[hipro5]

ROFL hehehe

 

 

nice time and bloody nice CPU

will someone ban George from HWbOT...this CPU is tooooo good hahaha j/k

 

:celebration:

 

None has seen it's REAL clocks yet... This week I'll upload the final scores because the ones you have seen, were only some testings to find out how it works and to "learn" the cpu and the mobo ...

 

Young hipro at it again

 

That's the spirit...