anvil Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Hi all, Just wanted to ask more info about one result that has been moderated recently by Massman. I'm talking about this score more exactly: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=899099 The comment of Massman is (I quote): "290MHZ BCLK, bugged????" Since such a Bclk is likely improbable and I don't think I am the only one on earth thinking that, I would like to know what has been decided by the crew concerning this result. Has the user sent you more proof about this result? The user still has HWboints for this submission. Cheers, anvil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 No more proof; I was hoping another moderator would've picked up on this and block the score . The BCLK is indeed bugged, so score should be blocked. (it's not actually the BCLK that is so worrying, but the insane QPI frequency) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted September 22, 2009 Author Share Posted September 22, 2009 What about the fact that someone (who is not a newbie) gets profit of a CPU-Z bug to get a 15 HWboints-gold cup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 I disapprove any submission of which the owner knows it might be bugged. Appart from that: score got blocked, so no need to continue the discussion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eeky NoX Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Hye mates, (I fallowed Anvil's (@OCM) redirection to get in the discussion) That's right of course Massman, but : this thread isn't there to give any evidence or denie the rules. At first the member who submitted this score is a well known bad player (not a noob), baned of a lot of french speeking forums and I pass...(OCM/UFH/eBay...etc) Than why is he still regestred ? I remember a friend who's been baned for a fake he claims his brother done with his account ! Just one fake which imo was'nt made by Shino !! And there a real cheater stay on the race ? oO I think it's not fair and that's all folks NB: nothing about the man himself, just battling for fairplay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3tuning Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 http://pc-overware.be/forum2/index.php/topic,1821.msg16396/topicseen.html#msg16396 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Again, I'm not going to discuss the user. Please refrain from commenting on anything other than the score. Thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The fact that he's banned on other forums doesnt mean he should be banned here... I believe most folks get a second chance when BUGGED results are submitted. Photoshop - or stuff like that - is a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted September 23, 2009 Author Share Posted September 23, 2009 If the user wants to validate his CPU-Z submission there is only one way : Submitting other benchmarks. The only thing is see in his account, is that his Wprime submissions are even not ranked in the top 100 of i920 category. I understand the people who are defending him, but even though someone is a friend of yours, you need some detachment... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 I don't know what you're talking about, Anvil, but please take it somewhere else. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anvil Posted September 23, 2009 Author Share Posted September 23, 2009 I do not know where you see in my sentences any kind of accusation... I'm just refering to his Hwbot scores and to the comment that c3tuning made. Sorry if people misunderstood me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Doesn't matter, I prefer everyone to stop complaining about the user or the score. Problem has been solved. The end. To everyone. Thanks all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c3tuning Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I find no logic to delet a score on assumptions! And I look forward to his future tests to prove his results ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I find no logic to delet a score on assumptions!And I look forward to his future tests to prove his results ... ...so a 400 bclk result would be perfectly fine as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 25, 2009 Share Posted September 25, 2009 I find no logic to delet a score on assumptions!And I look forward to his future tests to prove his results ... Check the QPI frequency of that score. 5.2GHz. Now find another one that comes even close to that result. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.