Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Uh So I guess my all time unbeatable record can be uploaded? http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2097133 Quote
Massman Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 It's a CPU-Z problem, really. You should ask on their forums why it's so messed up. With LLano, I think it's because they read the HTT incorrectly. Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 (cpuzvalidcanardpc HTT) / 2 = Real HTT Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 I understand, I have no doubt in my mind these clocks are valid (unlike what I posted above), but the problem is that with WR you should have proper validation, otherwise there is no difference between the two from a spectator's point of view. So Franck should be asked to fix his. Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 I understand, I have no doubt in my mind these clocks are valid (unlike what I posted above), but the problem is that with WR you should have proper validation, otherwise there is no difference between the two from a spectator's point of view. So Franck should be asked to fix his. Yes you right, But I already asked Franck several times, long time ago and over and over again and he still didn't fix cpuzvalid on AMD Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 On Llano, not all AMD Then we have a dilema... Quote
Massman Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Yeah. Whether or not to drop CPU-Z since the validation procedure is unreliable. Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 On Llano, not all AMD Not only Llano All socket A processors too, sometimes on Bulldozer, always on Bulldozer when using other than Core #1 even on My Phenom II it gets rejected http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2123856 Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 And how should we validate clocks from now on, with a realiable solution? Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Christian - we submitted Bulldozer WR with valid link, not rejected. But Yes, I agree that there are problems with AMD and Franck SHOULD fix them. Quote
Christian Ney Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Christian - we submitted Bulldozer WR with valid link, not rejected. My bulldozer is dead and the one I bought 4 months ago is still not arrived But Yes, I agree that there are problems with AMD and Franck SHOULD fix them. Good luck Quote
Massman Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 The thing is, though ... Franck SHOULD not anything . Remember, we're just users of his free application. If he listens to our requests, that's very nice, but if he doesn't ... it's also fine. Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Remember that money are not coming allways by selling something, but by collateral means also. Same goes for many other programs that are free, and bla bla it is my right, I do it for nothing, and then along comes a big software manufacturer and pop, design this exact software for me, but looking different, for money. Well, you would not get there without the users, so...dunno, I do not feel like somebody is doing me a favour if I use a software that eventually ends up in money. Quote
Monstru Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 Anyway, this is less important, maybe I have a different view on this then others and it does not matter that much. What matters is that when you validate a world record, you should do it with something working, valid. Now if CPU-Z does not work, we must find something new. Of course, I am not talking about this score, it is not Christian's fault that CPU-Z has problems, but I am thinking about the future. Depending on one software alone can be pretty dangerous and there should be options available... Quote
Massman Posted February 29, 2012 Posted February 29, 2012 I understand what you mean and I agree. I don't really see any viable alternative for CPU-Z, though. Not many applications combine 'hard to hack' and 'neat, clean and easy online validation'. Quote
Planet Posted March 1, 2012 Posted March 1, 2012 So we are allowed to submit invalid validations now for points? Quote
SSA Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 WoW , Big Congrats ! Amazing clock speeds. Do you have any other good memory clocking chip christian ? If Yes ,I would like to buy Monstru , you're completely right , we don't have any doubt on christian's record but WR should not be based on trust and hope it'll be fixed soon . Quote
SSA Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 Christian , Getting screen shot on such a this high mem clock is amazing as system will crash , bluescren and ... !!! do you have any higher back-up ?! Quote
Christian Ney Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 (edited) So we are allowed to submit invalid validations now for points? Now it has been validated: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2271178 No more rejected by CPU-Z. Picture will be updated in few hours WoW , Big Congrats ! Amazing clock speeds. Do you have any other good memory clocking chip christian ? If Yes ,I would like to buy Thanks, Yes, any Hynix H9C CFR and BFR Memory kits can clock very high on AMD Bulldozer/Llano. Also Samsung D series 30nm. Monstru , you're completely right , we don't have any doubt on christian's record but WR should not be based on trust and hope it'll be fixed soon . Now it's fixed do you have any higher back-up ?! No backups , my system has been maxed to the limits Edited March 2, 2012 by Christian Ney Quote
SSA Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 Christian CPU-Z again rejected the submission you linked above , I think we should wait for KIND fix of frank as it's a freesoftware ... Quote
Christian Ney Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 Christian CPU-Z again rejected the submission you linked above , I think we should wait for KIND fix of frank as it's a freesoftware ... http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2271178 No more rejected by CPU-Z. Picture will be updated in few hours Franck said Quote
Monstru Posted March 2, 2012 Posted March 2, 2012 Ok, now it looks right, this is how a WR should be validated. Big congrats man! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.