Wrong Result

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659441 no info about size of memory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680204

 

checked

 

There is info about memory size on 2nd link and this is the same card on 1st link.

[demiurg]

4000+ SD - not clawhammer

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719563

 

fixed

[demiurg]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719615 - wrong category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718500 - wrong category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680326 - no resolution

 

fixed

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 verification link doesn't work

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,mipmaps or sli,pls compare to other results!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666193 no res

[sacha35]

Please, check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702682

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693783

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688811

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646295

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688826

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688835

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690986

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717281

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699578

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670055

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688834

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709769

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699272

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694158

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693362

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690972

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704868

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702689

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702659

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696556

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713776

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696436

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688833

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693600

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669570

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653853

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652772

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650709

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671836

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680863

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688586 wprime 1.58 after 1.1.08,cpu-z only-why is valid???

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717947 not enought proof

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695906 1.58 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717935 1.61 2008 why is valid?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717076 1.58 2008

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696868 ????????????

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708022 cpu-z only

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693041 1.58 2008

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659441 no info about size of memory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680204

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,pls compare to other results!

 

these results still not fixed..pls fix it

 

fixed

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 verification link doesn't work

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,mipmaps or sli,pls compare to other results!

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666193 no res

 

fixed

[demiurg]

Please, check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702682

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693783

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688811

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646295

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688826

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688835

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690986

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717281

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699578

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670055

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688834

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709769

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699272

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694158

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693362

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690972

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704868

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702689

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702659

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696556

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713776

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696436

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688833

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689007

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693600

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669570

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653853

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652772

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650709

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671836

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680863

 

fixed

[Veld]

GPU-Z is absent

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719189

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718779

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718900

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722

[K404]

What? You cant call those out just because they dont have GPU-Z?! What about the thousands of results submitted before GPU-Z was released? Are all those results now less valid? Are they invalid?

 

Id like to nominate 90% of my 3DMark results for checking because they dont have GPU-Z windows present. Id like to apologise for submitting bench results before GPU-Z was released :@

 

Are the scores you've reported in categories in which you are competing?

[K404]

Thanks jmke, sorry the the outburst *oops*

 

common sense prevails!

[K404]

I just had a quick look through some of velds results...plenty 3DMark results without GPU-Z windows hahahahaha

 

veld- im not trying to pick a fight with you, but your idea can only backfire.

 

"people in glass houses shouldnt throw stones"

[Veld]

K404 & jmke

Maybe I'm wrong about GPU-Z.. but some of those Crazypc.ro 6600 DDR AGP's scores have no even RivaTuner's screen..

[Veld]

jmke, date of bench - july 2005 and later (but they were submitted at april 2008.. strange, isn't it?). AFAIK, RivaTuner/PowerStrip already exist at those times, so it was possible to make normal screen, with sufficient information.

If those guys (from crazypc.ro) can prove that they benched 6600 DDR AGP (not 6600 DDR2 or DDR3.. exactly 6600 DDR AGP!) - no problem.. otherwise, their scores must be deleted.

 

Sorry for my English)

[Bustah]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718147

 

no cpuz? cpu could be anything?

[Veld]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637713 - suspect PiFast score.. perhaps 4.3

 

Please check this..

[Veld]

jmke, I repeat - if those guys (from crazypc.ro) can prove that they benched 6600 DDR AGP (not 6600 DDR2 or DDR3.. exactly 6600 DDR AGP!) - no problem.. otherwise, their scores must be deleted

 

Insufficient verifications for rankings. Please check it..

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719189

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718746

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718900

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722

[K404]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05)

 

Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718806 wrong category

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=649274 (3DM03)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554578 (3DM05)

 

Both way too high for the clocks. Category- 7800GTX

 

 

too high for the clocks?please dont be funny and compare to the other results,both results uploaded more than year ago,7800GTX vmoded,normal score for such clocks,check the test details,no cheats

You report my results because i've reported yours,whatever man....shame i sold this card,I could show you better scores

[K404]

I am and have compared to other results- that why iv reported those two scores.

 

3DMark03-

 

you have 330MHz more on the CPU, the same GPU core clock and 25MHz more on the GDDR, yet somehow your score is 1600 points higher than mine.

 

Your score is also 600 points higher than Blindfitters- who has a QX9650 clocked 600MHz higher than your E66, a similar core clock and 40MHz less on the GDDR.

 

You think your score looks normal?

 

3DM05-

 

your score is 600 points higher than mine, despite having lower graphics clocks.

 

 

I KNOW how to bench, I even went through maybe 6 driver sets looking for differences. Your scores make no sense.

[71proste]

I read your post and can't believe it what you wrote

I dont have to explain anything,you should know as overclocker that cpu speed is not everything for a good score!!!!!Drivers,OS and a lot other things are sometimes more important than cpu,but I see you dont know anything about.

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603 no verification,still not fixed

[K404]

Awwww...isnt that sweet. I report yours, so you report mine.

 

You can keep reporting those scores- every time I change an FM link to fix a reported result, another result goes without. That wont be fixed because im not going to generate a new FM account every time I submit scores for a new bit of kit

 

You can resort to accusing me of not knowing anything, but im going to be mature and not retort back. OS is unlikely to make that big-a difference to scores. What drivers did you use? Il try them, compared to the 84.21 iv found to work best for me so far.

 

Report as many of my scores as you want. All are 100% legit, and nothing you can do or say can change that.

[Veld]

Insufficient verifications for rankings (there is no proof that's exactly 6600 DDR AGP)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722 - look at score's description..

 

jmke, please check this again...

[71proste]

Report as many of my scores as you want. All are 100% legit, and nothing you can do or say can change that.

 

it's not like that....don't forget that I was first who reported your results and you did same...anyway I don't care of your results/profile im not even gonna check it...but you have to have verification links..