Crew Sweet Posted April 6, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720263 Date 05-04-2008 WPrime v.1.43 mandatory version 1.55 after 01-01-2008 Please fix it. Thank's P.d.: some Mod, fix this wrong Bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikodemus Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719473 Wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720396 wPrime v1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720395 wPrime v1.61 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720263 Date 05-04-2008 WPrime v.1.43 mandatory version 1.55 after 01-01-2008 Please fix it. Thank's P.d.: some Mod, fix this wrong Bench fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted April 6, 2008 Share Posted April 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719473 Wrong categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720396 wPrime v1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720395 wPrime v1.61 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Sweet Posted April 7, 2008 Crew Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719771 *Error in computation* data 04-04-2008 Please Fix it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Pentium4 2.8 HT Prescott in Pentium 4 2.8A Prescott categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598635 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605407 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615203 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559763 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609700 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625850 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562386 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606352 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605417 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605410 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615209 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599287 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607710 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717857 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605485 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578371 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560239 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605411 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598455 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615210 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581208 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559759 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559366 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625849 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717860 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560554 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581204 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605271 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560022 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563541 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600981 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607719 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605409 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605533 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601567 _______________________________________________________________ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615211 - CPU-Z screen is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713 - CPU-Z screen is absent fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Bwanasoft & Demiurg, thanks! Good work! ) ______________________________________ GPU-Z is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719189 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718779 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718900 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722 Please check this.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 All the below users cards are 512Mb versions that are in the 1GB 2900 XT group, or have no verification, could someone please move these to the correct group. Results matching hardware: Radeon HD 2900 XT 1024 MB 3Dmark 2001 glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717286 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699580 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695917 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693774 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668010 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667559 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=665515 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655328 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655323 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=652766 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685987 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=713779 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=711626 RagDoll_Effect (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670604 3Dmark 2003. hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690982 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670058 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669604 glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699275 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693332 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668035 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=667604 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653888 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653050 cadaveca (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702676http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696555 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693596 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680867 dami1stm (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680781 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673124 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680971 3Dmark 2005. glenboy (Guru3D) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=717284 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=699274 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693373 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693329 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692699 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692367 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=657111 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=653095 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=685592 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514'>http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514 hadji_a (OutOfSpecs.Gr) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=690978 cadaveca (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702671 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696553 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693598 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680851 AuToXeC_w1zArD (AquaPC) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=673115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680977 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=677514 I will carry on with the rest tomorrow Sorry guys you won’t lose these results but just be put in the right group, I have been asked by a member of the HWbot crew to go though some of the results. Fixed Please provide only direct link to result, not compare one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615203 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573077 - suspect score. ORB link inaccessible. Perhaps, it's Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606352 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605417 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605410 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578371 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598455 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615210 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559759 - Prescott 2.8HT in Prescott 2.8A category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607713 - CPU-Z screen is absent fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 I think it is bad type of verification:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671223 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712800http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712802 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=712801 no gpu-z(2008) wprime 1024m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688586 wprime 1.58 after 1.1.08,cpu-z only-why is valid??? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717947 not enought proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695906 1.58 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717935 1.61 2008 why is valid? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717076 1.58 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696868 ???????????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708022 cpu-z only http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693041 1.58 2008 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Please, check these results:7600GS DDR3 results posted in 7600GS DDR2 category: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719314 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719176 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719200 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719184 5. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719004 6. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719025 7. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719044 8. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719103 9. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719682 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659441 no info about size of memoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680204 checked There is info about memory size on 2nd link and this is the same card on 1st link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 4000+ SD - not clawhammer http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719563 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719615 - wrong categoryhttp://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718500 - wrong category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680326 - no resolution fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 verification link doesn't work http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,mipmaps or sli,pls compare to other results! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666193 no res Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacha35 Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Please, check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702682 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693783 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688811 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688826 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688835 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690986 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717281 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699578 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670055 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688834 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709769 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699272 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694158 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704868 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702689 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696556 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713776 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696436 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688833 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669570 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653853 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652772 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650709 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671836 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680863 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688586 wprime 1.58 after 1.1.08,cpu-z only-why is valid???http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717947 not enought proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695906 1.58 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717935 1.61 2008 why is valid? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717076 1.58 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696868 ???????????? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708022 cpu-z only http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693041 1.58 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659441 no info about size of memory http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680204 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,pls compare to other results! these results still not fixed..pls fix it fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634322 verification link doesn't workhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669379 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605603 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719295 not possible for such clocks and cpu,mipmaps or sli,pls compare to other results! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=666193 no res fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Please, check these results wrong category I.E 512mb card in 1024 Group, or verification link does not work. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702682 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693783 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688811 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646295 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688823 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680781 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688825 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688826 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688835 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690986 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=717281 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699578 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670055 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688834 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=709769 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699272 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694158 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693362 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704868 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702689 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696556 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=713776 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696436 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688833 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693600 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669570 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653853 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652772 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650709 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671836 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680863 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 GPU-Z is absent http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719189 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719244 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719187 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719284 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718746 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718779 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718873 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=718900 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719113 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719139 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719076 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=719722 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 What? You cant call those out just because they dont have GPU-Z?! What about the thousands of results submitted before GPU-Z was released? Are all those results now less valid? Are they invalid? Id like to nominate 90% of my 3DMark results for checking because they dont have GPU-Z windows present. Id like to apologise for submitting bench results before GPU-Z was released :@ Are the scores you've reported in categories in which you are competing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 Thanks jmke, sorry the the outburst *oops* common sense prevails! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted April 7, 2008 Share Posted April 7, 2008 I just had a quick look through some of velds results...plenty 3DMark results without GPU-Z windows hahahahaha veld- im not trying to pick a fight with you, but your idea can only backfire. "people in glass houses shouldnt throw stones" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 K404 & jmke Maybe I'm wrong about GPU-Z.. but some of those Crazypc.ro 6600 DDR AGP's scores have no even RivaTuner's screen.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts