Kotori Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 great clock! congrats! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeepBeep2 Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Madness! Nice one Infra! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Yeah, this stick is crazy. The other one is no way near this and it's actually worse than my best Adata Vitesta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Outstanding. Question though, how are you getting validation on revision 1.60? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 It seems that it's still working... This one is an older Windows installation and didn't notice that I'm using cpuz 1.60 on it. Didn't pay attention when it validated first time. Christian could say if it's ok to use as long as it validates. Otherwise I can rerun, but it took me 3-4 hours to get there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 It seems that it's still working...This one is an older Windows installation and didn't notice that I'm using cpuz 1.60 on it. Didn't pay attention when it validated first time. Christian could say if it's ok to use as long as it validates. Otherwise I can rerun, but it took me 3-4 hours to get there. I wasn't questioning the validity of the submission, I was just wondering how it got validated. 1.60 was supposed to be shut down. I'd say if it still works, it's good to use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 I wasn't questioning the validity of the submission, I was just wondering how it got validated. 1.60 was supposed to be shut down. I'd say if it still works, it's good to use. Guy behind valid.canardpc told me it's an error in the code, wasn't supposed to be validated. He will (has already maybe) fix that, so please use 1.61.3 now otherwise, valid file will be rejected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 guy Behind Valid.canardpc Told Me It's An Error In The Code, Wasn't Supposed To Be Validated. He Will (has Already Maybe) Fix That, So Please Use 1.61.3 Now Otherwise, Valid File Will Be Rejected 10-4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 (edited) Files that are already validated will be "invalidated" or this is only for future submissions? I'm sure the valids are ok, but I forgot to add "_reliable" after my nickname. Edited August 19, 2012 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Lol....10-4 means OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted August 19, 2012 Share Posted August 19, 2012 Files that are already validated will be "invalidated" or this is only for future submissions? I'm sure the valids are ok, but I forgot to add "_reliable" after my nickname. Future ones, even if this one wasn't planned to be accepted by the engine. + I heard that they will remove all valids from 1.60.x to 1.61.2 (incl.) ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.