zupernico - GeForce 8800 GTS 320 Mb @ 684/1026MHz - 16443 marks 3DMark06

[Guest Ximi]

Memory CPU not contain data.

 

All 3D Mark's , 06 , 05 , 03 the same.

 

Update it and upload again the submissions.

 

Now , it's not valid.

[zupernico]

Hi ximi, how are you??

 

I asked the question

 

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=59468

 

Sweet hwbot staff says: Yes, zupernico, you can use cpu-z 1.57.1 for 3D submissions

[Sweet]

Yes, this sub. is ok, Ximi you have to use the common sense.

 

Edit: zupernico, next time, like say Moose, try to show memories with another soft, thanks

Edited November 11, 2012 by Sweet

[Moose83]

No matter, you must show memory details, and in your submits i dont see them;)

[zupernico]

what program I can use?

[Sweet]

I use Memset, or any program that show mem. Aida - well...at this time I dont remember if asus program show this

[Mr.Scott]

Honestly, there is no reason that you can't use CPU-Z. There are others that have with no problem even at your high OC and XP. Random example:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2274948_theking_3dmark06_radeon_hd_7970_41912_marks

It's not working for you because you're on the edge of stability, and this makes your SS invalid. Stop trying to skirt the rules and run a good submission. It's up to the person making the submission to supply a rules conforming SS, not the staff to give you alternatives. There are exceptions, but that is usually for just super old hardware.

Edited November 11, 2012 by Mr.Scott

[Moose83]

Agree:)

Without RAM tab the result is not valid, no discuss!

And why 1.57 with ivy? You can also use 1.61 or 1.62.

Edited November 11, 2012 by Moose83

[Turrican]

mem tab for 3d is not mandatory guys. it's valid, no discuss!!

http://www.hwbot.org/news/884_application_12_rules/

Edited November 11, 2012 by Turrican

[Mr.Scott]

My bad. I thought this was all changed in the new rules page that we're still waiting for.

By your reasoning that means this is still valid too.

http://hwbot.org/news/882_application_10_rules/

 

But by all means, let's make it easier for the slackers to submit BS screenshots. Kinda defeats the purpose of rules, wouldn't you say?

 

 

Hmmm......

http://hwbot.org/news/7914_rules_update_2012_hwbot_general_rules_and_guidelines

 

section 2.1 says you're wrong.

and section 2.2 obviously hasn't been updated.

 

Finally, the sub is NOT valid by reason of the rules that you DO enforce, right here.

http://hwbot.org/news/885_application_13_rules/

 

Not using current CPU-Z.

Edited November 11, 2012 by Mr.Scott

[knopflerbruce]

It would be extremely harsh to block a sub because an old CPUZ version was used for CPU speed etc. The important part is that it is recent enough to display the information correctly. The last link you used is also for CPUZ subs only, not 3DMark. The 3DMarkxx pages have no limitation on CPUZ version I think.

 

I wouldn't mind having mem tab mandatory for 3D, but that's not the case today. Perhaps time to discuss it, i think most people add it anyway.

[Mr.Scott]

Whatever.

 

UPDATE THE GOD DAMN RULES PAGE !!!

 

Not but a week ago I had to delete 20 of a team mates subs for just the same foolishness as this. If you're going to pick and choose what's enforced and on whom, then don't even bother updating it. There's always gonna be an excuse.

[knopflerbruce]

Whatever.

 

UPDATE THE GOD DAMN RULES PAGE !!!

 

Not but a week ago I had to delete 20 of a team mates subs for just the same foolishness as this. If you're going to pick and choose what's enforced and on whom, then don't even bother updating it. There's always gonna be an excuse.

 

I don't know who have told you to do what (definatly not me), but there are no restrictions on CPUZ version written in the AM3 rules - effectively that means what I said: use whatever version that correctly displays frequencies and so on. That's the only reason we want CPUZ tabs to be included in the first place. Same for the general rules, no version requirements. And if someone pointed you to the CPUZ benchmark rules, well... that's a mistake. CPUZ benchmark rules have NOTHING to do with AM3, or any other benchmark than CPUZ:)

[Moose83]

But nearly all benchers include ram and CPU tab;)

I think Update the rules a bit:)

[Mr.Scott]

I don't know who have told you to do what (definatly not me), but there are no restrictions on CPUZ version written in the AM3 rules - effectively that means what I said: use whatever version that correctly displays frequencies and so on. That's the only reason we want CPUZ tabs to be included in the first place. Same for the general rules, no version requirements. And if someone pointed you to the CPUZ benchmark rules, well... that's a mistake. CPUZ benchmark rules have NOTHING to do with AM3, or any other benchmark than CPUZ:)

I'm not arguing with you. 99% of the time I agree with you.

The stuff I had to delete wasn't CPU-Z related, but just as stupid and foolish. That was my only point. Water under the bridge now, not a big deal.

Can we just get the rules completely updated.........please......soon?

[Guest Ximi]

Hi ximi, how are you??

 

I asked the question

 

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=59468

 

Sweet hwbot staff says: Yes, zupernico, you can use cpu-z 1.57.1 for 3D submissions

 

Hi zupernico ,

 

Try that : http://www.cpuid.com/news/58-cpu_z_gigabyte_g1_edition.html

 

Its a new version of CPU-Z , if show memory CPU-Z , you have done it.

 

Regards amd sorry for that ! I was think that RAM info was necesary.

[zupernico]

Hi zupernico ,

 

Try that : http://www.cpuid.com/news/58-cpu_z_gigabyte_g1_edition.html

 

Its a new version of CPU-Z , if show memory CPU-Z , you have done it.

 

Regards amd sorry for that ! I was think that RAM info was necesary.

 

Thank you very much ximi,

 

This morning I re-tested the 1.61 version and ....... surprise! now works correctly. I do not know what happened. The only change is

4x4gb Ripjaws 2133

for

Trident 4x4gb 2400

 

the rest of the pc is the same

 

I have made ​​benchmarks with 1 x nvidia gtx 275 and nvidia gtx 275 sli.

 

 

They are made with version 1.57, but i repeat them with version 1.61, but will try your version too, thank you very much again ximi.

 

I feel all the problems caused.

 

thaks

 

Nicolas