Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
Here you can find the translation in italian http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fholicho.lib.net%2Fbench%2Fbench_104.htm

 

...but doesen't specify the latency of the ram.

 

Gradus (just a couple of post above) confirmed that latency e frequency were 22257 1:1 219 cooled by LN2.

 

Also there is the italian translation for the database http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ace-sup.com%2Fmemory%2Fmtec.html

 

This score is very strange,I don't understand if the memory is 1:1 or 4:3,may be 1:1 with 2 2 2 7 9.

 

pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol

>pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol

Why not? My pc133@202 2-2-2-7-9 or Gigio's pc133@210 2-2-2-7-9 would be also "hard to beleive" 1 year ago.

This score is very strange,I don't understand if the memory is 1:1 or 4:3,may be 1:1 with 2 2 2 7 9.

 

Uff...find it :)

http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm (pretty much at the middle of the page right under the 59s picture)

 

4 : 4 : 1、2-2-2-5/7

 

 

pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol

The stock rating ins't usually a precise meter of the overclocking ability of a chip :)

If these rams are really able to do 200 2225 @ air I don't see why shuldn't be able to do 220 @ LN2

  • Author
>pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol

Why not? My pc133@202 2-2-2-7-9 or Gigio's pc133@210 2-2-2-7-9 would be also "hard to beleive" 1 year ago.

 

The score is of 2001,in that time there was few people on ln2 on the cpu,this man had cpu and ram on ln2?he's a genius...

 

But this genius...did not think sl6by is better for superpi?

 

@ gradus and @ terra:you have a mission,destroy this record :D

 

 

Uff...find it :)

http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm (pretty much at the middle of the page right under the 59s picture)

 

 

 

 

 

The stock rating ins't usually a precise meter of the overclocking ability of a chip :)

If these rams are really able to do 200 2225 @ air I don't see why shuldn't be able to do 220 @ LN2

 

 

...219mhz 2 2 2 5 7...incredible!!!

Edited by ruggero

The score is of 2001,in that time there was few people on ln2 on the cpu,this man had cpu and ram on ln2?he's a genius...

 

But this genius...did not think sl6by is better for superpi?

 

@ gradus and @ terra:you have a mission,destroy this record :D

 

At that time Japanese 'clocker were a lot ahead if compared to the rest of the world.

 

Also weren't you the one that said that the smokes of the cpu pot would also cool down the ram in the order of -30 degrees?:)

  • Author
http://web.archive.org/web/20011106002035/http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm

 

with foto.

 

 

And he dont bench sl6by bcz available in 2002. Japan mans bench P4 after 1266 in 2001.

http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL6BY.html

The parts are available starting from Jul 22, 2002

 

 

OMG...

 

If also the sl5XX spec are avariable starting 2002,there is a reason for choice of 1.266.

 

OMG²

Apparently some 01219 are able to do frequency close to the 0103 so i'm guessing that MAYBE some other batch may be able to work as good at them.

 

That's all.I didn't want to upset you mate :)

No problem, Caos Wolf) we all know sdr binning is a problem. We just need to find golden chips - and probably sit them on good pcb.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...