ruggero Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) Good score boy...but what are in photo 3 and 4? Edited March 30, 2014 by ruggero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Great ram pot and you're powering the board with Evga Epower, nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Photo 3 - Asus ROG OC Panel - acting like thermometer (left for cpu, right - for memory) Photo 4 - top view of the system with EVGA Epower soldered instead of stock vrm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Did epower gain you anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 easier voltage regulation (stock vrm allows up to 2.05v with pinmod and up to 2.5-2.7v 2 with complicated VR mod) and probably some boost with long benches (32m, 1024m) - signle phase vrm overheats quickly with >2min load. I didn't notice any gain even with cpuz so far if compare modded stock vrm vs epower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 30, 2014 Author Share Posted March 30, 2014 Photo 3 - Asus ROG OC Panel - acting like thermometer (left for cpu, right - for memory)Photo 4 - top view of the system with EVGA Epower soldered instead of stock vrm. Wow,it's the first time which I see the Evga Epower and the asus rog oc panel...Now I understand what's the emod power My best score is 1.00.7xx at 205,but I had more problems with ln2 pot,i think with my sdram is possible 208 2 2 2 7 9 with a thermal regolation around -50°;also a better s.o. can give my a hand with the time,but my run is only for fun,for this is not in hwbot. In my idea,and is not the first time which i write this,1:1 is not the right way to take the wr 1m 370,way of 4/3 fsb/ram is better,find a lucky sl6by or a normal 1.266 and try 230/172 2 2 2 5 7. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 I'm dead sure me and GraduS will break 1m in next 3-4 months using 1:1. Gigio already has memory capable <1m. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 30, 2014 Author Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) I'm dead sure me and GraduS will break 1m in next 3-4 months using 1:1. Gigio already has memory capable <1m. Time sub 1m is possible with 205(not 200) and a good s.o.,I use only copywazaa. But time sub 1m(59s) and wr socket 370 are not the same thing ;-) Edited March 30, 2014 by ruggero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ludek Posted March 30, 2014 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) As you said, when ~2.0 V and tualatin @benchmarks, default power section is overheating easly. I had an idea to connect Zombie to TUSL2... and for few months i'm collecting Pentium 3 (0.18 and 0.13 um). It will be lots of fun, but for now - only SS cooling. Very nice score. Hope to see sub 1 min ...I had more problems with ln2 pot... Try to use IHS from 478 or tualatin CPU. Wilamettes are the easiest to cut Edited March 30, 2014 by ludek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 31, 2014 Author Share Posted March 31, 2014 As you said, when ~2.0 V and tualatin @benchmarks, default power section is overheating easly. I had an idea to connect Zombie to TUSL2... and for few months i'm collecting Pentium 3 (0.18 and 0.13 um). It will be lots of fun, but for now - only SS cooling. Very nice score. Hope to see sub 1 min Try to use IHS from 478 or tualatin CPU. Wilamettes are the easiest to cut There is yet a score sub 1 min,in fact my time is not wr. The sl6by have a IHS,is not necessary another...the problems was for other motivations 1)cpu pot lost nitrogen 2)ram pot had was too fast,-100°,-40°,-80° and my sdram have coldbug,-55° in my cusl2,-65° in my tusl2-c (???) In these conditions was hard bench,so,a run a 195,a run a 200 and a run a 205...208 freeze(cusl2);after one hour I tried with my tusl2-c,but freeze around 202 with -65°,A year has passed, I do not remember well :-( I promised myself another bench when someone beat my time,but in italy the times are hard and I sold almost everything :-( I have played a little with terra,I don't say immediately my best time,I hope he is not angry with me overclock is only a hobby Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 I hope not to hear cool story next time that you had 250 2-2-2-5-7 memory, unlocked cpu with x12 multi being capable of 3ghz and sub 50s result) Anyway this result is the best here (as well as pifast dd yesterday). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 31, 2014 Author Share Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) I hope not to hear cool story next time that you had 250 2-2-2-5-7 memory, unlocked cpu with x12 multi being capable of 3ghz and sub 50s result) Anyway this result is the best here (as well as pifast dd yesterday). ahahhaha,my friend,no super ram,no super cpu,no super main,today I have only a cusl2 and a SL36A,but is not dangerous. Gigio(the idea of joke is of gigio)has a memory capable of 208/210 2 2 2 7 9 with -50° and the right alphatimings,but he have not a sl6by. It's all ;-) Edited March 31, 2014 by ruggero Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigioracing Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 very good time ! the challenge continues... Ruggero ,is time to post all your submissions... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigioracing Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) I hope not to hear cool story next time that you had 250 2-2-2-5-7 memory, unlocked cpu with x12 multi being capable of 3ghz and sub 50s result) Anyway this result is the best here (as well as pifast dd yesterday). you're talking about socket 478 462 ;-) . s370 it s impossible... my 1266 ES is a sl5... is good only for reference o memory clock ... but i think super P at 230 cl3 with a good 1266 sl6 is possible... Edited March 31, 2014 by gigioracing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 31, 2014 Author Share Posted March 31, 2014 very good time ! the challenge continues... Ruggero ,is time to post all your submissions... Gigio,is time to buy a good SL6BY PS:my best score is 1.00.7xx I have not other scores. you're talking about socket 478 462 ;-) . s370 it s impossible... my 1266 ES is a sl5... is good only for reference o memory clock ... but i think super P at 230 cl3 with a good 1266 sl6 is possible... 230*9,5 is a easy setup,with a good sl6by 230*10.5 is possible,but 172 2 2 2 5 7 is better then 230 3 3 3 7 9,more fast,more possible:there is not a sdram capable of 3 3 3 7 9 but there are more sdram capable of 172 2 2 2 5 7. Perhaps russian overclockers don't trust the italian overclockers:when I said "when I said 200 is not sufficient for 1 minute" I have not been believed...this is not good ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 again, 230*9.5 4:3 bad setup. impsy sub 1m with it. only 245+ x9.5 pos norm, dunno. 230x10.5 4:3 impsy sub 1m too imo. in 2008 i test sl6by and 200 1:1 22279 faster then 228 4:3 22279. 1.05+ and 1.07+. no copywaza and bad win. difference 2s. diff between 22279 and 22257 is 1-2s. so i think for 10.5x: 200 1:1 22279 = 230 4:3 22257 normal result pos only with fsb 245+ and 57. for 1400 p3 its impsy hard, for 1266 p3 very pos. but i dunno about time. PS "but 172 2 2 2 5 7 is better then 230 3 3 3 7 9" - NO! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted March 31, 2014 Author Share Posted March 31, 2014 again, 230*9.5 4:3 bad setup. impsy sub 1m with it. only 245+ x9.5 pos norm, dunno. 230x10.5 4:3 impsy sub 1m too imo. in 2008 i test sl6by and 200 1:1 22279 faster then 228 4:3 22279. 1.05+ and 1.07+. no copywaza and bad win. difference 2s. diff between 22279 and 22257 is 1-2s. so i think for 10.5x: 200 1:1 22279 = 230 4:3 22257 normal result pos only with fsb 245+ and 57. for 1400 p3 its impsy hard, for 1266 p3 very pos. but i dunno about time. PS "but 172 2 2 2 5 7 is better then 230 3 3 3 7 9" - NO! ...do you remember when you said " 200*10,5 1:1 2 2 2 7 9 = 100% sub1m "?...200 is not sufficient for 1m. I think you must study better socket 370,now your scores are as your knowledge of this socket. Difference between 2 2 2 7 9 and 2 2 2 5 7 is not 1-2s,but 4-5s. We speak about right alphatimings for high frequency,but if you don't know the normal timings... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) I still dont post my new 200 10.5 result. "Difference between 2 2 2 7 9 and 2 2 2 5 7 is not 1-2s,but 4-5s." 1 second. on 2300-2500mhz mb 1.5-2s. I think you must study socket 370 better. Leave your results to yourself, I'm not interesed in them. Edited March 31, 2014 by gradus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caos Wolf Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) Hello guys, I'm sorry to intrude again but I find something that you may find interesting. First:this is the complete setup that Holicho used for sub 1m I think that he was 1:1 whit the mems at 22257 or (more probably) 22279 I made a reaserch for those mems (mtec 0103u) and came up with this table (in japanese) http://www.ace-sup.com/memory/mtec.html If I've understood it correctly those mems should be able to do 200+ mhz 22257 on air. I think those tests were made with air cooling beacuse the result of the mems i have experiece with are -pretty much- the same of mine. ...so if you are looking for the holy grail of SDRAM those should be the real deal. Also that site is a great database for sdram frequency. Hope I was helpful Edited March 31, 2014 by Caos Wolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gigioracing Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 I have try with Celeron 1300@2400mhz ram cl2 1:1 but time is 1:05 .celeron is no good... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 Holicho used LN2 on mem. 22257 219mhz/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caos Wolf Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 (edited) Holicho used LN2 on mem. 22257 219mhz/ I was talking about the ram of the database not the Holicho's ones Edited March 31, 2014 by Caos Wolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 31, 2014 Share Posted March 31, 2014 Impsy find this mem) I have some Mtec, but not 103. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ruggero Posted April 1, 2014 Author Share Posted April 1, 2014 I still dont post my new 200 10.5 result. "Difference between 2 2 2 7 9 and 2 2 2 5 7 is not 1-2s,but 4-5s." 1 second. on 2300-2500mhz mb 1.5-2s. I think you must study socket 370 better. Leave your results to yourself, I'm not interesed in them. I see a difference of a 4/5s with a coppermine,may be is different with tualatin. Hello guys,I'm sorry to intrude again but I find something that you may find interesting. First:this is the complete setup that Holicho used for sub 1m I think that he was 1:1 whit the mems at 22257 or (more probably) 22279 I made a reaserch for those mems (mtec 0103u) and came up with this table (in japanese) http://www.ace-sup.com/memory/mtec.html If I've understood it correctly those mems should be able to do 200+ mhz 22257 on air. I think those tests were made with air cooling beacuse the result of the mems i have experiece with are -pretty much- the same of mine. ...so if you are looking for the holy grail of SDRAM those should be the real deal. Also that site is a great database for sdram frequency. Hope I was helpful Good link,thank's. But,are you sure than ram was 1:1 and not 4:3?I don't understand japanese. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caos Wolf Posted April 1, 2014 Share Posted April 1, 2014 Good link,thank's. But,are you sure than ram was 1:1 and not 4:3?I don't understand japanese. Here you can find the translation in italian http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fholicho.lib.net%2Fbench%2Fbench_104.htm ...but doesen't specify the latency of the ram. Gradus (just a couple of post above) confirmed that latency e frequency were 22257 1:1 219 cooled by LN2. Also there is the italian translation for the database http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ace-sup.com%2Fmemory%2Fmtec.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.