ruggero Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 Here you can find the translation in italian http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fholicho.lib.net%2Fbench%2Fbench_104.htm ...but doesen't specify the latency of the ram. Gradus (just a couple of post above) confirmed that latency e frequency were 22257 1:1 219 cooled by LN2. Also there is the italian translation for the database http://translate.google.it/translate?hl=it&sl=ja&tl=it&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ace-sup.com%2Fmemory%2Fmtec.html This score is very strange,I don't understand if the memory is 1:1 or 4:3,may be 1:1 with 2 2 2 7 9. pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol Quote
TerraRaptor Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 >pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol Why not? My pc133@202 2-2-2-7-9 or Gigio's pc133@210 2-2-2-7-9 would be also "hard to beleive" 1 year ago. Quote
Caos Wolf Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 This score is very strange,I don't understand if the memory is 1:1 or 4:3,may be 1:1 with 2 2 2 7 9. Uff...find it http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm (pretty much at the middle of the page right under the 59s picture) 4 : 4 : 1、2-2-2-5/7 pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lol The stock rating ins't usually a precise meter of the overclocking ability of a chip If these rams are really able to do 200 2225 @ air I don't see why shuldn't be able to do 220 @ LN2 Quote
ruggero Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) >pc100@219 2 2 2 7 9...bh-5?lolWhy not? My pc133@202 2-2-2-7-9 or Gigio's pc133@210 2-2-2-7-9 would be also "hard to beleive" 1 year ago. The score is of 2001,in that time there was few people on ln2 on the cpu,this man had cpu and ram on ln2?he's a genius... But this genius...did not think sl6by is better for superpi? @ gradus and @ terra:you have a mission,destroy this record Uff...find it http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm (pretty much at the middle of the page right under the 59s picture) The stock rating ins't usually a precise meter of the overclocking ability of a chip If these rams are really able to do 200 2225 @ air I don't see why shuldn't be able to do 220 @ LN2 ...219mhz 2 2 2 5 7...incredible!!! Edited April 1, 2014 by ruggero Quote
Caos Wolf Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 The score is of 2001,in that time there was few people on ln2 on the cpu,this man had cpu and ram on ln2?he's a genius... But this genius...did not think sl6by is better for superpi? @ gradus and @ terra:you have a mission,destroy this record At that time Japanese 'clocker were a lot ahead if compared to the rest of the world. Also weren't you the one that said that the smokes of the cpu pot would also cool down the ram in the order of -30 degrees? Quote
gradus Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) http://web.archive.org/web/20011106002035/http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm with foto. And he dont bench sl6by bcz available in 2002. Japan mans bench P4 after 1266 in 2001. http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL6BY.html The parts are available starting from Jul 22, 2002 Edited April 1, 2014 by gradus Quote
ruggero Posted April 1, 2014 Author Posted April 1, 2014 http://web.archive.org/web/20011106002035/http://holicho.lib.net/bn_02.htm with foto. And he dont bench sl6by bcz available in 2002. Japan mans bench P4 after 1266 in 2001. http://www.cpu-world.com/sspec/SL/SL6BY.html The parts are available starting from Jul 22, 2002 OMG... If also the sl5XX spec are avariable starting 2002,there is a reason for choice of 1.266. OMG² Quote
Caos Wolf Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) M.tec 01057 TBS6408B4E-6 http://www.ebay.it/itm/Memoria-RAM-Sdram-128-dimm-168-pin-/161259620657?lgeo=1&clk_rvr_id=612750309674&vectorid=229494 These are not 0103U but for 2.5€ i would give it a try. Edited April 1, 2014 by Caos Wolf Quote
TerraRaptor Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 everyone here gave a try to hundreds of sticks I think) M.tecs suck so we need exactly 0103 to give it a try. Quote
Caos Wolf Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 Apparently some 01219 are able to do frequency close to the 0103 so i'm guessing that MAYBE some other batch may be able to work as good at them. That's all.I didn't want to upset you mate Quote
TerraRaptor Posted April 1, 2014 Posted April 1, 2014 No problem, Caos Wolf) we all know sdr binning is a problem. We just need to find golden chips - and probably sit them on good pcb. Quote
TiN Posted April 2, 2014 Posted April 2, 2014 I can sell one 1400S haha, left from oscilloscope upgrade Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.