Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Started by K404,

    Are HWBot ok with software RAMdisk results? Kenny

    • 11 replies
    • 2.9k views
  2. Started by steelrat,

    where the first result? and why am I second? in the global rating I am first.

    • 0 replies
    • 991 views
  3. Started by flclisgreat,

    http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7080 i lost some points for the athlon xp. i had them, was at 28 points, then i go to upload more and i am back to 24. it may have been cause i didn't have pics up instantly. they where saved as .png, and must have been to big or something for me to upload them. i changed them to .jpg and uploaded them now. so could someone fix this for me? edit: ok, that is gay. i have an "unknown, cpuid 'Pentium 3 Celeron 600Mhz" on my bencheis for it. i hope i can submit them cause Pentium 3 Celeron 600Mhz was a drop down suggestion.

    • 4 replies
    • 1.4k views
  4. Started by MaXtoRZP,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589006 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593123 I can't understand. Who can explain?

    • 5 replies
    • 1.5k views
  5. Started by The Wicker Man,

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=609008 I submitted this result, and tried to change the CPU to what it is, a HT P4 2.8ghz@3366mhz, but there is no option for the P4, in the little menu that drops down...... Thanks for your time.....

    • 7 replies
    • 1.8k views
  6. Started by pkotlowski,

    hello, First look at this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_252. Category is A64 2800 but all the results are fake. They're cheating. Please do sth with it. Now i have 3 results spi 1m. I'm 3rd in A 64 2800+ but I don;t have hw points for this. Please help. Regards Piotr PCarena.pl team moderator

    • 6 replies
    • 2.8k views
  7. Started by paulxmn,

    Hello, http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=608417 I do not have a Q6700 please edit to E6700 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=608409 I was awarded the points for this result under the team , but the points and ranking do not show in the link or my home page. Thank You paulxmn

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  8. Started by Ginner,

    Several Northwood 2.0 GHz posted as Willamette 2.0 GHz... this one has been verfied by moderator, but screenie shows NW http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547537 http://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=270&thumb=false Would admins plz check this out and move them to their correct place?

    • 0 replies
    • 963 views
  9. Started by The Wicker Man,

    http://www.hwbot.org//result.do?resultId=604655 Can this be changed, or should I try reunning it again, I dont see anything on the Orb about the 1700+ thats being reported.....

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  10. Started by Metro,

    Hey Guys, 1st great idea to make hwbot I registered a couple of days ago trying to get more accurate results to compare than futuremark, because there were some fishy results, to my surprise you have them also here. Could you please check results from the user Couppi with single 7900GS 3dmark03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578065 3dmark05 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577895 He has already been blocked on 3dmark06, look at the other top scores they have much better CPU speed, GPU speed and Vmem speed, and they are far from him. I would also recommend to verify all top scores and hall of fames Reards

    • 0 replies
    • 961 views
  11. Started by THEROCK,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599890 This guy is the first with SiS Chrome 9 which is more advanced than UniChrome Pro. I think this result should be properly moderated.

    • 0 replies
    • 922 views
  12. Started by harleybro,

    Can the same person bench for two teams using two differant id's? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584988 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584979

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  13. Started by M!chalak,

    Hello In the Athlon 64 3700+ Clawhammer category most results are in San Diego CPUs In the Athlon 54 4000+ Clawhammer this situation are repeat. Some of this results was cheked by moderation and sign as correctly. Regards, Paul sry for my bad english

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  14. Started by THRASHER2,

    Is there a Geforce 8800 GTX "AGP" ?? http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_343 Processor Pentium 4 'E' 3.0Ghz PCMark 2005 - 6230 marks - Paul442 (TRP) Processor: Pentium 4 'E' 3.0Ghz @ 3902mhz Videocard: Geforce 8800 GTX @ 575/900mhz Something is fishy here

    • 4 replies
    • 2.6k views
  15. Started by riaak,

    http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=553320 It should be under 3800+ AM2

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  16. Started by aspstein,

    As I can see all the results postet under the E6800 category CPU is wrong. Seems that all of them are X6800s Can anyone confirm/enlight me on this? http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&cpu=Intel+Core+2+E6800+%282.93Ghz%29&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1001&offset=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Regards aspstein

    • 3 replies
    • 1.3k views
  17. Started by DEVILEK,

    Hi Can You verify results of http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=8108 this user. He is from Poland and post on local forum score of 3D and SPI. 3D 06 with GTX is fake, his Super PI run is fake, not correct checksum. Please veryfing his score ; orb .... Thanks.

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  18. Hey guys, Since I've discovered that my SunFire x4600 server is very fast at pifast, I was wondering if you accept pifast scores for more than 1000000 digits like with SuperPi? Best Regards, Joe

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
  19. Started by Freakezoit,

    Why is my score blocked ?? http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598880

    • 0 replies
    • 944 views
  20. Started by joegaz,

    Hi, I'm new to the hwbot thing and I was wondering why my scores have been blocked with wprime 32M and 1024m as well as my 1000000 digit pifast score considering that all three have been world records? They were on there for a few hours and then were shown as blocked and then disappeared. I would appreciate any information you can give. I'm more than happy to send along additional screenshots or whatever proof you require. Thanks! Joe

    • 10 replies
    • 2k views
  21. I don't belive that is possible that http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576394 they take half time from the others result...

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
  22. http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597150

    • 0 replies
    • 952 views
  23. Started by STEvil,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597510 Does DP stand for dual processor? There is another selection possible which is "Xeon 5120" but i'm not sure which is the correct option. Might it be a good idea to add a tab which allows the user to select the number of processors used? Adding more results, will watch this thread and change if needed I guess.

    • 0 replies
    • 1k views
  24. Hi, Wondered why this result was blocked? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551140 Also what is the best way to post a screenie for an Aquamark score? Do you want CPU-Z and or ATiTool or other card overclocking software screenies included with the Aquamark score?

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  25. Started by cowie33,

    hello,my sli 88gts 320 score for 3d 01 is not showing up on your datdbase but it is showing on forum cowie i4memory forum member also in 68nu pci-e there is a 68gs leading the way in most catigories http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=590267 thanks for all the hard work guys happy easter too:)

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views