Submission & member moderation

His score is for a AMD 64 Mobile 2700+ Socket 754 PCMark04 Hall Of Fame: PCMark 2004 - 4066 marks - frebrez (OverClocking-Ma...) Hardware Rank: 1st AMD Athlon XP 2700+ - 2.0 points Videocard: GeForce4 Ti 4200 64 @ 250/250mhz His printscreen show a Socket 754 Mobile CPU http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_229

Like i have explain it here: http://www.hwbot.org/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=5640#p5640 i have a Cfire system, (X1950CF+X1900XTX) my last submitted score (on Gruru3d ) have been add in the 2 categories, single and dual GPU's).... i have delete the bad score then re-enter it manually (checking the box multiGPU).. but badly my score stay in some place like a single card score ... or i confirm.. it have been made with dual-GPU's system.. Sorry to do a second topic for this, but i think i have make the first in the bad thread..

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575518 What's wrong with this one ? Why is it blocked ???????

Hi, I just got #1 Intel Core 2 E6750 (2.67Ghz) in wPrime 32m, which would be great except the CPU was a QX6700 lol http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580340 Can someone fix that for me? Thanks

Cathegory: GeForce 6800 XT (NV42) Single: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564133 SLI: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568742 Both results pointed to the same verification ORB-link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9077236 This result done on two 6800XT (NV42/PCI-E) cards clocked to 540/1130 and works in SLI-mode on P5W DH Deluxe with SLI-modded forceware drivers. Nothing wrong with the result, but it duplicated as SLI and Single at the same time.

This (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552414) CPU-Z Score For A 2.6Ghz Celeron Skt478 is Actually A 775 Celeron D. Check the CPU-Z Link To Verify

http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByProcessor.do?cpuModelId=740 A couple of things observed: 1. In CPU-Z ranking my score of 4931 mhz is ranked lower than Titons in points, yet in the ranking it is recognized as being higher http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=555174 2. It doesn't seem the boints are awarded for global CPU-Z ranking here? For example, maxxxpct's 6 Ghz screenshot ranks him top 30 in CPU-Z hall of fame, which means around 20 boints, doesn't it? Yet the boints are not there. If I have missed something important here, sorry for troubling ya

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566429 that is for the 3800+ X2, not the single core cpu. was wondering why the score was allot more than mine, now i know why. would somebody please move/delete it.

Is Radeon X700 Pro a 128mb and the Radeon X700 Pro 256mb on the HWbot chart? Because I have seen Radeon X700 Pro 256mb scores posted in the Radeon X700 Pro chart. Sample: http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_277 3Dmark 2001 - 32524 marks - PreacherMan (Techsweden.org) Processor: Intel Core 2 E6600 ... @ 3872mhz Videocard: Radeon X700 Pro @ 450/510mhz His Link shows a 256MB card http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9048187

There will be very little difference between the scores of the 2 versions, and it`ll be too easy to flash the BIOS of one with the other and pick up 2 sets of points so would it be suitable to just keep the 8800GTS as one entry? Cheers, K

These members have there Video card Posts in the wrong section. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_589 3Dmark 2001 - 6131 marks - HardFreak ([M]adshrimps) 0.4 points Processor: AMD Athlon XP 2500+... @ 1833mhz Hardware Rank: 5th GeForce FX 5600 - 0.4 points Description: Barton2500+ FX5600XT -all stock 3Dmark 2003 - 4661 marks - ~~~ZETT~~~ (Team MXS ModLab...) 2 points Processor: Pentium 4 'C' 2.8Ghz @ 3343mhz Hardware Rank: 1st GeForce FX 5600 - 2.0 points Description: Pentium 4 `E` 2.8Ghz @ 3343MHz, GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

Just have a look in there, I have already anounced it as "fake" but the moderator did not see the problem. The cpu frequency which is anounced as 2000Mhz is in reality at 1995Mhz, he should have 0 points. How can I report it to a moderator ? Thanks Under

Lucky Guy Double Scores on the same Benchmark with same processor http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_549 PiFast - 46.63 sec - hary (PurePC.pl) Processor: Sempron 64 2600+ @ 2927mhz Hardware Rank: 1st Sempron 64 2600+ - 2.0 points PiFast - 46.63 sec - hary (PurePC.pl) Processor: Sempron 64 2600+ @ 2927mhz Hardware Rank: 2nd Sempron 64 2600+ - 1.6 points

checksum: 9BA86303 (invalid) - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572605 checksum: F79F7146 (invalid) - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=564707 checksum: 7AC46D40 (invalid) - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566946 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=511214 why top the curtained? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=529928 screen without the processor http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525895 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=538967 no screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571847 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572780 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572312 http://www.hwbot.or…

There is no check sum at the bottom of his Printscreen Plus there is no millisecond Linky http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1018 SuperPi - 136 sec - ARGO (eXtremeBit@OcItaly) Processor: Pentium 3 933Mhz @ 980mhz Hardware Rank: 1st Pentium 3 933Mhz - 2.0 points Printscreen looks Fake http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=5770&thumb=false

1. no screen with processor - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553570 2. no screen - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=397835 3. no screen - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=398167 4. screen doesn't work - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507456 5. screen doesn't work - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507441 6. verification link doesn't work, no screen with processor - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553567 7. no screen - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=397833 8. screen doesn't work - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500679 9. screen doesn't work - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500634 10. what ch…

This person posted his in the wrong Section http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1166 SuperPi - 25.99 sec - VoRtAn_MaDgE (XtremeSystems) Hardware Rank: 1st Athlon 64 3300+ - 2.0 points Description: FX55@3300 (not the max) + tccd (12x275 - 2,5-3-3-6) He should post it in this section http://www.hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=8

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522472

Why Barton 2600 + XP-M is he in the ranking 2600 + XP and not 2600 + XP-M? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563532

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554920 it's SLI,not single, because of baby clocks

Well, fake may be a little harsh. But, they are certainly invalid. The ORB is down, and the specs and associated screenshots mean it is hard to validate SLI versus single card. But, since the SM2 and SM3 scores are so high and the C2D scores are not, a score of 14K is simply not possible with a single card at the reported CPU and GPU clocks. There are two I noticed: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=573097 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=573208

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=553494 Unless SuperPi can compute PiFast and the above system is heavily optimized, the result is in the wrong section. If I am wrong then I apologize for calling attention to this.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554041 fake result with LOL clocks!

This member has posted his score in the wrong Benchmark SuperPi - 25.99 sec - VoRtAn_MaDgE (XtremeSystems) Hardware Rank: 1st Athlon 64 3300+ - 2.0 points Description: FX55@3300 (not the max) + tccd (12x275 - 2,5-3-3-6) http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showpost.php?p=746785 Linky http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1166

Hello guys, my X1900GT is recognised by the ORB of 3DMark as a 512Mb whereas it's a 256Mb, I know it has been reported as suspicious so I post here in order that you don't place it in another category! Thanks