Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

bigblock990

Members
  • Posts

    548
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Posts posted by bigblock990

  1. For sale Intel i9-9900k boxed retail version. Excellent like new condition. Quickly tested r15 ambient, no further testing as I have better cpus already.

    Tested with asrock z390 phantom gaming 9, normal water loop, 19c ambient.
    R15 50/46 @ 1.24v

    hp10Je4l.png

    ch27rN5l.jpg

    B9wKATFl.jpg

    $545 shipped, payment via paypal, shipping will be USPS priority.

    I can also ship worldwide, please pm me to discuss this.

    Thanks for looking.

    • Like 1
  2. On 11/22/2018 at 10:54 AM, DR4G00N said:

    Anyone try Coffee IGPU yet on this board? I was trying to use it yesterday but every time I installed the drivers it just gave a black screen. 

    Edit: NVM, I think the IGPU is dead in my 8700K. 7350K's IGPU works fine.

    I don't think IGPU works for coffee on mocf. IIRC the two pins that burn are vcc for IGPU on coffee chips.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. 54 minutes ago, Alex@ro said:

    I'm voting for comp points as well, i am not sure how many people realise the effort needed for qualifying, travelling, benching live in a contest final.... Even online contests, binning parts and buying vendor selected stuff, etc. 

    You will still get comp points, but they will only count towards seasonal ranking. Same as how it works now, comp points last for 1 year which makes sense because the comps are held annually.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 3
  4. 2 hours ago, GeorgeStorm said:

    edit:

    Career:  Top 20 global + Top 40 HW 

    Seasonal: Top 30 subs + Top 10 Comp (all during that 'season')

    Numbers can be adjusted obviously, but to me this is a nice balance.

    I already suggested this idea, and frederick replied that he isn't interested in having different "logic" between the rankings. He wants both career and seasonal to be the same system.

  5. 33 minutes ago, FireKillerGR said:

    Of course I am not the most objective person on the planet; far from that actually :D
    And got a bit "tilted" about the 03 thing tbh (nothing against yosarian ofc).

    Coming up with suggestions to improve the new format and everything takes time. 
    Time that was already spent less than a year ago and no matter how it looks now, it will def need fixes once rev8 is out.
    That was my main issue; everyone will need to re-adapt again.


    Will need to check it in more detail during the weekend.

    This ^^

    At this point I'm ready to have rev8 pushed to production. Then frederick can spend time bug fixing instead of debating with people here. The rest of us can spend time getting used to the new revision instead of talking about it. Like stavros said, time to re-adapt again. Rip off the band-aid so to speak.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  6. 3 hours ago, GeorgeStorm said:

    Only had a chance to skim through the thread.

    Whilst I don't mind the idea of career vs 'current' ranking, but why have comp points in both? Comp points in current and no comp points in career makes more sense to me as comps are much more optional in my mind.

    As others have said, but combining points (top 30 global+hw) you naturally bias it towards those with higher end hw, that was the best thing about the seperate hw and global points adding to your total.

     

    Edit: Also while I don't really pay attention to team rankings, getting rid of the 'power points' (which was basically just the highest score with certain hw on a team counts?) would massively change the rankings, once again to teams with more high end hw.

    I agree with both statements above. Annual comps = annual reset comp points. And George explained why I enjoy the seperate hwpoint subs.

    • Like 2
  7. 2 hours ago, richba5tard said:

    No, hardware points still contribute for your member points. In rev8 the suggestion is to use the "total points" of your submission, which is hw+gl+wr points.

    Ok I see this now. I will miss the dedicated hardware slots in the rankings, that is one thing I enjoy from rev6/7. But ofcourse I don't expect hwbot to be tailored to my specific likings.

     

  8. 13 minutes ago, websmile said:

    I treat them more or less same apart from one setting, I think the japanese and some chinese do the same or found other solution, so if you have good a2 mems, they will work like a1 or even better. The a2 layout worked for me on other Z170 boards as well I tested and I also saw MSI boards for example at 4000c12 as well. I did not think this is a secret.

    P.S. Unfortunately I am obliged to keep this private until saturday evening... then I can publish this

    Appreciate the response. Totally fine if you want to keep private. I simply wanted to know if I need to try again, and seems the "hunt" continues :D 

    • Thanks 1
  9. 13 hours ago, Synth Wave said:

    Is the Z390 Taichi Ultimate compatible with Windows 7?

    Like achill3us mentioned, its not officially supported but yes win7 does work with both mobo's I listed.

    2 hours ago, Achill3uS said:

    Officially non of the z390 supports win7, not even microsoft does anymore :D but you can find results made with both boards on w7, so doable if im not wrong.

    Guys Formula Drive ver:3.0.94 works fine for you with 8 core on w7? For me multi can be changed only downwards, not changing on the way up, anybody has same issue?

    For mocf with 6c/8c you need to use AFD 3.0.209.1, everything is working properly on all OS with that version. See link from splave below 

    On 4/12/2018 at 6:31 AM, Splave said:
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...