Mr.Scott
-
Posts
3337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Mr.Scott
-
-
It's on one and two (#19 and #31).
I think it's because there's no zero in the .xxx part of the time and the DB can't decide where it goes. You need to start putting all three numbers in buddy.
-
Be careful. This opens up a slippery slope. If you change that 550 category, does that mean you'll be changing the other categories that have Black Editions lumped in with all the other submissions? Eg: 5400+BE
Or are you willing to separate all the categories by stepping/revision?
-
Congratulations Team OCX. Nice runs.
We will meet again, I'm sure.
~Team CP
-
Nice run on water buddy. Your team appreciates your effort.
-
That's too bad. That was a great OC on that chip.
-
Good run but, no official backround in SS????
-
I think there are a lot of pot in end year
I fully expect there will be.
-
Those pins are your problem for sure, and the extra jumpers WILL give you more voltage just as Turrican says.
-
I use the same adapter. The only jumpers I use are on A5-6 and B8-9, and it works just fine. All other adjustments I make in the bios or SetFSB. Hope that helps you a little.
-
Which adapter?, Powerleap or Lin-Lin?
-
Still limited to 3.4v though.
-
anyone fire up the ocz ddr booster yet
-
D26 Black Mantaray CPC ON and CPC OFF versions
Here you go.
-
Anyone still has the TicTac biosmods for NF7-S rev2.0? It's hard too find a working download link for these...
Which one are you looking for?
-
Excuses, excuses, sorry Alex, it's not that clear and simple at all. It makes it very easy to manufacture screenshots if all the applications don't have to show at the same time.
Still no pic of the actual rig though, which IS a requirement.
That's even easier to manufacture, just find a pic of one on the internet that you like and submit it. Who'll know?
I guess I'll just have to face the fact that there will always be a way to beat the system.
Sorry for wasting everybody's time.
-
Hi, qwerty84:
Can you please explain us, why SuperPi isn't open in the taskbar ?
Thanks
Ouch.
-
You need to PM me the stepping on that bad boy.
-
Good idea. I've suggested this some time ago with no luck...
The problem with that is any picture could be submitted, and might very well not be the processor that was used for said submission, so we're right back to the trust thing again.
-
Think we could get a pic of the actual rig though? lol
-
And thank you Alex, for bearing with my seemingly endless PM's. You do a great job here.
-
Thank you for the responses gentlemen, and Miss 1day. I do know about the L5 bridge, as that is why a Sempron shows up as a MP on boards that do not officially support Semprons, but that was not my point. The point was that until there is a "fix" for CPU-Z, and that's all anybody uses for identification at the present time, Then that's what should be used to place processors in the proper category, not what somebody "says" the processor is.
Also, Intentional Misrepresentation = Cheating, but that's not what I'm saying is going on here. I was saying that if you let these submissions slide on somebody's "word", that it opens the gates for unscrupulous people to exploit this and submit false entries that may never be found or challenged. All I want is it to be fair across the board. Sorry I'm using you as an example Sam, but I can assure you it's not personal.
-
Hmm, strange that the first result I looked at in the Athlon XP 1700+ Palomino was misread.
http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/875171_tiborrr_cpu_z_athlon_xp_1700_palomino_2136.06_mhz
I think there is a systemic failure by CPU-z to correctly read and identify the CPU's in this particular sub-set from AMD consistently.
Mr.Scott if you think otherwise please speak plainly and state what it is you suspect.
Speaking frankly, given that I have shown that all CPU-Z versions work correctly, and that is the only proof that can realistically be excepted, I think the submissions that are supposedly mis-read should be placed in the category that CPU-Z reads them. Any other excuse is simply exploiting a hole in the verification process, and opens the database up to intentional mis-representation of identified processors using the same excuse.
-
Blutregen has a misreported 1600+ too (link)
Flagging that one too.
Besides, that was his only submission for that CPU, so it was probably an entry mistake. You had a dozen submissions on three different processors.
-
I provide picture of the actual CPU with the CPU-Z submission usually - these are all genuine XP 1600+, 1700+, 1800+ and not MP.
I guess they are misdetected by the CPU-Z, if you have an XP Palomino I think you can have a go yourself.
I'll set up something shortly. I have plenty of Palominos. If you have one set up, why not test ver. 1.55 and see if that does it too. Here's a ver. 1.55, 2000+ Palomino, and that looks fine.
Here's a ver. 1.56, 2100+ Palomino, and that looks fine too.
http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1075684_whitelion_cpu_z_athlon_xp_2100_palomino_1860.4_mhz
I don't know what to say man. Only your submissions are mis-read?
Data base for listings 1-20 is messed up.
in Submission & member moderation
Posted
Both links are identical to me.