yosarianilives

Correct

But I saw post team au was retiring from cc

Not according to database

Okay here's my comments AMD CPU - GOOD Intel CPU ycruncher 1b - Can we allow xeons with same core count as consumer chips? 3dmark physics - F sku banned, although not explicitly. Overall seems fine and I like the idea, igp is an interesting challenge too cpu freq - stage is fine, just something to look out for there are ways to show all cores at a clock speed when it's just one core. Should be pretty obvious if done though AMD GPU Heaven xtreme xfire - rules say use 2 videocards so it may seem that 6990 quadfire is allowed as it has cayman core and 590 was allowed in similar circumstance in team cup gpupi 1b - if server cards like mi25 not allowed then there are a total of 4 cards allowed for this stage Firestrike ultra - can we drop to extreme or normal firestrike, the vram requirement makes system ram oc have a large performance impact as seen last time we did fsu for country cup on dual gpu cards Nvidia GPU - GOOD

Yeah I think there are still some concerns on some stages, I'll type a full list when I get to a desk today

Hands off my garbage, firestrike ultra uses A LOT of vram, we can't afford to be banning high end dual gpu cards. Otherwise it's literally just a system ram bench Source: this isn't the first fsu dual gpu stage in a comp

Idk, probably some asshole

Guys people have already planned their vacation time around nov/Dec. As fun as it would be to cuck the aussies, just no. We can discuss dec/Jan for cc 2023

We've voted on this before, stays Nov Dec. But we could always do another poll, ultimate decision is up to Alby. Either way we should suggest as many stages as we can think of that we'd want otherwise we have no right to complain about bad stages after comp start.

if we did bclk I'd say just go with cpu bclk for simplicity, but apparently seby killed 2 ssds already from am4 bclk, not just the install either. so maybe skip this one lol

W8 they're not linked? And I think we'd do it by chipset so at least c8 would be out cause x570 sux

H67 is H67, P67 is P67

As team cup 2022 draws to a close it's a good time to start proposing stages. I went through the team cup ones and kept the ones appropriate for cc as a starter but please comment with ideas for stages or risk getting laughed at when you wait until after comp starts to complain about stages. https://docs.google.com/document/d/18iCZWy45BrKM_on_K0JxEzWEizkrR6AX12JhDywwNd0/edit?usp=sharing

It basically has to do with when systeminfo was able to actually detect it. Because there's lots of legacy scores where it could be used and not detected its still allowed as a tweak on those benches. By the release of Timespy and later system info had fixed this

The time to change stages is far far gone lol, comp ends on the 15th.

Lmao forced air is also convection. If we wanna go full science here you forgot evaporation which is how ln2 works. I wonder when we get 100% radiation based cooler ?

Typically the stepping is at the end, gi is c2 and gm is C3. Hdz vs hdx typically is locked vs unlocked if you look across all the chips. Didn't look like 955 was different when I looked

I thought the locked version was hdx not hdz, but either way if cpuz detects the same then x265 would as well and need to manually select the right one based on ihs. If the multi is wrong it probably was a mistake on the side of the one subbing so report and it will be moved. I'd say 90% of people probably don't have the locked one.

It's hard to find out every unicorn before comp start. Although this one is kinda like a donkey someone taped a horn to and painted the word unicorn on the side. At least it was only like $40

I assume not?

Definitely shouldn't do this, we joke that it's suggested just cause asus mad their lhe all core freq got beat by ln2

In general you are right, although I think emergence of ocable platforms that rival server like tr pro and w3175x makes wr pts actually about ocing and not borrowing clients cpu time. And for best results you still need ln2 which you won't run on borrowed system. Maybe wr pts are still bad idea for bot as a whole I just want to see people run ln2 and go hard on these big chips ?

Probably like any other pts where your best one counts. If you get best 8 core score on 12900k you can't get pts for 2nd best 8 core on 12700k. Same for wr, if you get best score overall with 64c and second with 32 you only get wr pts for the 64.

I think for sure no wr pts for single thread benches since their ranking already shows the wr, we'd get the same effect by just giving them more globals for top 10 scores or something. For multithread benches I'm OK with all having wr though maybe some people will complain it makes expensive systems too op. Honestly I don't care about their opinions personally though lol. For 3d idk, I wouldn't give it to legacy because most of them aren't gpu bound so single card is the fastest config. Similarly on newer stuff multi gpu is being dropped, already for greater than 2 way you need 10 series or older. Soon even 2 way seems to be going away so it may not be long before even on benches that aren't just about cpu oc that we see single card be the fastest. I think at minimum gpupi gets wr pts. We should also make a new hardware category called accelerator cards so xeon phi doesn't take the wr pts from cpus on gpupi. Or maybe not, that could be interesting in its own way

Nice necro