Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Matsglobetrotter

Members
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Matsglobetrotter last won the day on October 19 2020

Matsglobetrotter had the most liked content!

Converted

  • Location
    Philippines

Converted

  • Interests
    Travel, computers, ham radio, SM7PKK

Converted

  • Occupation
    Humanitarian Agency

Recent Profile Visitors

2228 profile views

Matsglobetrotter's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Week One Done Rare

Recent Badges

102

Reputation

  1. My suggestion would be to test any potential new introductions to fundamental changes in categories by organising one or more challenges specifically set up for such changes so the community can actually see what it does. If it turns out to have real value and gain interest then it can be discussed afterwards with more evidence base.
  2. I suggest admin accept comments as they are without blasting a user. it normally create better open discussion among the community. there are like/dislike buttons. Meanwhile I'm sure it was just a heated moment while trying to resolve something for the bigger community. Keep pushing forward i know the intent is good. Cant wait to finally get all my gear through customs to start benching... in a month...
  3. Great the user community give useless input. Thanks you very much... appreciate the comment.
  4. to me the changes proposed sounds like a Sponsor wanting to change the scoring to make them look better behind the scenes. core is core thread is thread. and if multicore is not competitive compared to old generation but it beat the crap out of a single core score then that is what it is. Very sad moment when we try change a fundamental basis of he scoring. Indeed no processors for with equal threads to cores has been competitive for years when they should have been. We want performance on both single core and multi core and multi thread. tough luck if the new processors cant do it right. I think that would reflect the reality of the trickery.
  5. OK have done what i can for now. Will relocate myself from Manila to Rome with my gear so no OC for atleast 2 months.
  6. please delete this one for challenger legacy missing subdetails https://hwbot.org/submission/4766061
  7. by DESIGN, development 10900k is 10 physical core CPU. not that hard to understand. Cores are cores, threads are threads and as per challenge rules you can only use the 10900k in the challenge DIV I round 2 not in the other divisions.
  8. Hi, I dont call anyone a cheat. No sure what auto generated message you get from Hwbot in the background. I reported the score as impossible score and mention that it was not 4K. Even i get such messages. I also insisted the possible cheat naming is removed from the bot *you can see in chat forum on this. We all reacted on this score as for the challenge competition we all chase the top scorer and yours became just that 🙂 the moderators can delete this one and then you just resubmit. no harrm done. the 4K tickbox is not available at first. you need to register the advanced serial number in catzilla once you reboot the option will be available.
  9. The higher end CPUs like 10900k has a better memory overclocking capability compared to a 10600K. it also has a different level of cache. So HWbot follows the actual cores as per CPU design (without hyper threading considered) that is also how cpus would be compared in any review by just about any magazine. The rules makes perfect sense and have done so for years. Why not just start following the same. We all have to🙂. If you note yes on some we cant beat the guys with RTX3090 however even those guys in some of the stages use an older GTX 1080ti to get the highest scores.
×
×
  • Create New...