Everything posted by rbuass
- OGS - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti @ 2940/1700MHz - 2sec 691ms GPUPI - 1B
- rsannino - 2x GeForce RTX 2080 Ti @ 2220/2050MHz - 148876 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance
-
Some scores from me was deleted
for the information. best wishes
-
Some scores from me was deleted
Someone?
-
Some scores from me was deleted
Hello I'm not very active from. some time, but I noticed some good scores was deleted. I was looking for my GTX 980ti Fire Strike Extreme (its just one example), and it's not there. So I noticed I lost some nice good scores from. the past. I will appreciate if you can help. Best wishes
- rsannino - GeForce RTX 2080 Ti @ 2640/2100MHz - 370098 marks 3DMark03
-
A results of mine disappeared
I appreciated. Thank you guys. Best wishes
-
A results of mine disappeared
Just in case, you have doubt, we made alive. The Catzilla World Record 720P I did not find yet, but is also the World Record. I will appreciate if you can put back in the ranking, because there are lost 2 WR. Best wishes Thanks
-
A results of mine disappeared
My two World Records of Catzilla with GTX 980 Ti disappeared. The benchmark is the Catzilla 1040P and the Catzilla 720P. I went to look at my results of Catzilla and no more in the ranking. Please check Ronaldo
-
First impressions GTX 1060 @ GTX 1070 HOF
We, from TecLab, got a GTX 1060 chip and "reimplantation" in a GTX 1070 HOF PCB. So, we did the same with the Samsung Memory and flashed to GTX 1060 HOF GOC BIOS. Next video we will complete with some scores and add the procedures in the BGA station (that's all registered in videos). Best wishes.
-
The failure in 3Dmark still remains
Some people prefer to keep this way. Maybe was better to keep the secret and post a crazy scores powered by LOD.
-
The failure in 3Dmark still remains
I do not care what one or the other might think, but the fact is that if someone can use, everyone should be able to. What some think they "think they know" or do not know, likewise, does not matter. The fact is that Pasi did talk to me that they are working to fix that issue, and considered important, and we of the Galax team had already reported. The same "mimimi" happens few time ago We show that decreasing BCLK, could affect the RTC, and that time some people have attacked us for it. Few days after, they changed the System Info because they understand that is a failure. Neither do I care, I have not participated in rankings, but done overclocking to get good scores and teach overclocking for others. Some people do not like sharing what they know, you can be sure, it's not my case. Before I was very active in Hwbot, but for a long time I did not participate in rankings. While on the one hand some of them remain whining about these results, on the other side, many people are grateful and happy to learn how to use tweaks like LOD. best wishes
-
The failure in 3Dmark still remains
I don't think is necessary to remove your scores. Validation I mean is just for Futuremark. Also, in the past, all that benchmarks used a lot of LOD (01, 03, 05, 06, ... ) it's for the newers. The video intend to bring to anyone that don't know the tweaks, how it works, and sure, show that Futuremark validation should be failing from a long time. Best wishes.
-
The failure in 3Dmark still remains
Well, I have posted this topic in "benchmark results" but should it's not the right place. Just to inform that few days ago, Futuremark annouced the new updates, in order to fix some issues and to prevent validation issues (LOD). In the truth, the problem was not fixed, and still remains as you can see in the video. ""if you want the video plz look for it"" Best wishes.
-
Report a important failure
Thanks Splave. That comment comes from you, a highest level overclocker is very nice to me. I consider very important. Best wishes.
-
Report a important failure
Thanks guys
- Rauf - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti @ 2000/1500MHz - 223164 marks 3DMark2001 SE
-
Report a important failure
Agree Not only allow, but teach everybody how to apply to improve the scores. Don't need to worry about the old scores, but to keep fair for everyone that nice tweak from now, in my opinion. Further, there are about 50 combinations per benchmark to find the best... that's a lot of job ðŸ˜
-
Report a important failure
You can't validate (or must not) Fire Strike Ultra, Extreme, Performance. The last not allow LOD
-
Report a important failure
I forgot! Added captions in English, since very few will understand Portuguese. Just set to see subtitles. Ronaldo
-
Report a important failure
This video not intend to offend, attack or accuse any overclocker, but just prove that failures. I sent no scores since 2015, and even my best scores I did not send (we made in events and Live streams), so I am no more pro active in the League. But I keep overclocking, teaching and sharing the art of overclocking every day, that I like too much, and remember two years ago, we reported a bug in Futuremark's detection system (System Info). In it, the decrease of the base clock of the CPU changed the time and took it out of synchrony (time of the benchmark different from the time of the windows), improving the results in a unreal way. Many people criticized our work, but a few days later, Futuremark made the change and Hwbot recognized our information as legitimate: http://hwbot.org/newsflash/3225_futuremark_tightens_rtc_validation_check_following_tecmundo_and_rbuass_findings We are always studying and evaluating the possibilities and this time, again with Futuremark, we discovered a serious fault. We from GALAX team reported it to Futuremark and we hope that the problem will be corrected soon. Apart from that, we would like to make it clear that we like it very much and consider its high quality tests, and not intend to drive that question for anyone. I even noticed we have a new Revision and wish the best for Hwbot and all community. Maybe someday I will be back to the league. Sorry the broken english rbuass
- k|ngp|n - Titan V @ 2250/945MHz - 17293 marks 3DMark - Time Spy
-
Catzilla error
Here the same issue. We can't install Catzilla on W7, and W10 is not good for this benchmark. Can't run on X299.
- $@39@ - GeForce GTX 1080 Ti @ 2632/1624MHz - 32374 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike
- The Official GALAX GOC 2016 Worldwide Qualifier support thread