Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

rickss69

Members
  • Posts

    170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rickss69

  1. It would make sense that AMD be used throughout, but it is unclear atm...
  2. Made this submission the other day... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/995121_rickss69_3dmark_vantage___performance_82945g_integrated_graphics_desktop_22_marks?tab=info I have been unable to select the correct graphics category. It should be Intel GMA HD, but it will not accept this input. Can someone modify/edit my submission to reflect what it really is? I am sure I received points for the run when I should not have. Thanks
  3. I never recieved any notification that is was "blocked" by anyone. At any rate, I have re-run the bench twice again at a higher clock with the same results. How high a clock must I post before this one is approved? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/989594_rickss69_sisoftsandra_core_i7_980x_198050_fpu?new=true
  4. Why has this submission been removed by Thor? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/985984_rickss69_sisoftsandra_core_i7_980x_194100_fpu It is stated as being impossible score with given hardware or possible bug. The next highest run is not that far off... http://hwbot.org/community/submission/975353_sweet_sisoftsandra_core_i7_980x_182400_fpu As off late, numerous PCMark scores of mine have been reported and approved. What exactly is it about this submission that requires removal without even being reported or disputed by any bot member?
  5. Big bugs, small bugs...who ever knows for sure. Now you are starting to understand.
  6. Any other benchmark would have been preferable to Vantage for this competition. Way too many bugs here to be realistic. When a score is put up that is far and away higher does that constitute a bugged driver...even when said driver operates correctly in every other benchmark? Notice the myriad of OS/driver combination's thus far. It is clear that this is a driver carnival for sure.
  7. What kind of card is that in the pci slot on some of the competitor's mb's? They all appear to be the same with some kind of post code led showing.
  8. For illustration: I can see what the numbers are here in this screen, be they correct or not. I just did not understand where other's were getting thier numbers from. The fact that some gpu-z tabs read while others do not led me to think that we were not getting accurate results from the benchmark.
  9. I don't believe that is so when 80% of the gpu-z screens do not record the frequencies. Your link does not address gpu-z at all and there still has been no explanation where the stated frequencies were taken from. Just trying to get to the bottom of it...
  10. That was an assinine response to a perfectly logical question. I should have expected as much...
  11. If we are to discuss obvious glitch's then I must bring up another item. Both bennylodewijk's and dasa's submissions state core frequencies of almost 1300mhz...these chips simply won't run there. I do not know where they got those numbers from or if it was an honest mistake. Has anyone else been able to run Vantage at those frequencies? If not, I must conclude they were glitch runs. My view is that if gpu-z will not show the core/mem frequencies that is a glitch in itself. How about making that a requirement for submissions?
  12. Yes the screen is distorted during the first two tests...normal in the cpu tests. 1995 driver in Vista 64 is normal. Only way I see you can rectify is to specify what OS and driver is to be used. What exactly is normal results anyway? We are all operating far outside the parameters of this tech...someone needs to define the parameters if the results are not acceptable.
  13. By normal drivers I assume you mean anything other than 1995...very well. What does normal fps mean? This contest just invites glitches in one manner or another.
×
×
  • Create New...