[Finding cup results]

Go on your page under My Submissions.

 

You can there list each benchmark and beside your results there will be a cup (if one has been awarded).

 

Ah ok thanks

[Finding cup results]

Hey,

Thought I'd have a look at some of my old results etc (been tempted to start benching again) and I can see on my profile I've got some hw cups, but I can't find an easy way to find out what they are?

If there isn't one, why not make easy links to them or something, and if there is, could someone explain?

 

Thanks

[The REV4 public test server! (feedback welcome)]

No globals for cpu-z???

And it's not working for me, getting nothing, server getting hammered?

[comment on these...sharing hw?]

I have no idea in this personal case.

But if there is evidence either way, which you've certainly hinted to Massman, then why don't you say/show it.

Cos you don't want the hassle?

This is your job Massman, you get paid to do it, so do it.

[Splave - GeForce GTX 275 @ 1312/1300MHz - 132485 marks 3DMark2001 SE]

Awesome work, looks like it should be a good battle

[HiVizMan - Radeon HD 5870 @ 1407/1303MHz - 117674 marks 3DMark03]

Awesome clocks, especially on DI!

[dRweEz - GeForce GTX 580 @ 1200/1201MHz - 155978 marks 3DMark03]

Not bad!

Nice to see you back at it

[The big MSI MOA 2011 thread: information, videos, comments and more ...]

Certainly interesting how MSI UK chose the competitors, care to shed any light on that if you know anything Rawz?

Looks like you got a bit of work to do in the coming weeks.

[Results with ROG Expander....]

I gotta agree with Splave here, how comes some people are allowed to submit results with non available HW, but others aren't?

[El Gappo - Phenom II X2 555 BE @ 7028.8MHz - 7028.8 mhz CPU-Z]

Awesome score! Why bother with all 4 cores?

Glad to see atleast some of it is going right

[Teams joining to get to No.1... Xibit's idea?]

Post on XS.

Thread has since been taken down.

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=262649

 

Thats what I've been told.

[Teams joining to get to No.1... Xibit's idea?]

It would mean they could dominate, as they would have some real high profile benchers, but also have the numbers.

[Teams League Rev.4]

Massman I'm confused, why do things need to change?

As a whole, I think rev3 isn't half bad.

[GraduS - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 5005.1MHz - 5005.13 mhz CPU-Z]

How comes your multi is 13??

[GraduS - Core 2 Q6600 (2.4Ghz) @ 5005.1MHz - 5005.13 mhz CPU-Z]

How comes your multi is 13??

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

Well, while I haven't spend that much

The same applies.

Considering jabski has literally benched every s775 cpu, none of my scores would count

 

Kenny, yes this is true, I was merely making a point about how wrong I thought it that a team be based on its strongest members

Only now realising I was saying it should be based on its weakest Not what I meant at all.

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

After finally getting to the end of this thread

Im sorry SF3D, but I think you are completely wrong.

A team is only as strong as its weakest player

Making a only the top players get points for the team is completely opposite to the whole idea of a team

That even if you're not great, you're still helping

By only allowing the top guys to actually get points for their team it greatly discourages guys lower down, and just seems a pointless idea to me

[HWBOT Rev.4 - The Plan.]

The biggest issue here is as others have put it

It makes most scores worthless to the team as most things have been benched by someone in our team with better cooling than the masses.

[GeorgeStorm - Core 2 E5200 (2.5Ghz) @ 4812MHz - 11sec 359ms SuperPi]

Thanks,never really pushed them.

Be interesting to see how far they can go

[Evocarlos - GeForce GTX 480 @ 875/1000MHz - 109692 marks 3Dmark 2001]

Great result!

Couple of benches with that setup and OCF are going down