Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

bolc

Members
  • Posts

    689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by bolc

  1. I have better ones from aerotracks but not tested yet. Suppose to be 3000 9-12-12,@2.1 ,corsair dominator platinum.

    My gskill tops at 2870 9-12-12 tight @2.15v

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

     

    Hi :)

    Your post made me go back testing my 2400c9 / 2600c10 tridentx kits.

    They are pretty similar at 2400c9 and 2600c10 in term of minimum voltage required. Curious to see how voltage scales with frequency...

    The first module is sweet, 2600 9-11-11-20-1T 102 at 1.72 seems ok (tras can be lowered at 18 or 16, I tried once in XTU session).

    Is this anything similar to yours or you benched straight at 2800 ?

    Next step is 2800, and I guess I will need to trcd=tras=12... also waiting for a 4670k with hopefully a better imc than my g3258 (2800 is fine with one module with MFR chips, but not with 2...).

     

    UP on your search :)

  2. Hello :)

     

    This one is strange :D

    I installed AMD catalyst 13.9 with app sdk and catalyst center for the 4850 DDR3.

     

    In the GPUPI list I get AMD Opencl and Intel Opencl for the cpu, but nothing at all for the gpu (driver is installed though).

     

    Strangely enough, no scores are posted for DDR5 card, only for DDR3 cards, like mine.

     

    GPUPI - 1B overclocking records @ HWBOT

     

    I tried GPUPI 2.2 as others did, but same result.

  3. From what i got, fmod.dll should be related to audio driver and stuff.

     

    Are you sure the .dll is present in your system, did you found it in sys32 folder.

     

    If it present check the .dll version compared to what you could find googling it.

     

    Thanks, and well put ;)

    I had not enabled hd audio and installed no driver so the fil was simply missing.

    I added one from https://www.dlldump.com/download-dll-files_new.php/dllfiles/F/fmod.dll/3.72/download.html

    and it works fine...!

     

    If this thread can be of any help for other dummies like me :D

    ++

    • Like 1
  4. Hello,

     

    I can run 3dmark01se, 05, 06, vantage, no issues whatsoever

     

    For 3dmark03 I get this crash error. I tried uninstalling reinstalling, removing all other 3dmark softwares, removing futuremark info, and having only a clean 3dmark03 install, and I still get this.

    I also launched directx 9.0c standlone installer, which did not install anything new, same issue.

     

    Any thoughts...?

     

    mini_2355633dm03crash.png

     

    Thanks in advance.

    Cheers.

  5. We accept results without link normally but not without valid screenshot. The link is only mandatory for global top 20 and even then I am not sure it helps, there is no stuff like sysinfo to validate anything on the sub

     

    Bolc, if you are only here to complain, I propose you search another site to do so :) - I am starting to lose patience with you

     

    I am not complaining, I am trying to figure out the rules, but this will be my last post here

    Here is a copy paste from the link given by geekbench, it covers mroe than exhaustively the few info given on the launch app window

     

    System manufacturer System Product Name

    Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64-bit)

    Model System manufacturer System Product Name

    Processor Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50 GHz

    1 processor, 4 cores, 8 threads

    Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9

    Processor Codename Ivy Bridge

    Processor Package Socket 1155 LGA

    L1 Instruction Cache 32 KB x 4

    L1 Data Cache 32 KB x 4

    L2 Cache 256 KB x 4

    L3 Cache 8192 KB

    Motherboard ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. MAXIMUS V FORMULA

    Northbridge Intel Ivy Bridge 09

    Southbridge Intel Z77 04

    BIOS American Megatrends Inc. 1903

    Memory 4096 MB DDR3 SDRAM -1MHz

     

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     

     

    Finally, how valid is HWMONNITOR showing only the core temperatures (temp = Tjmax - DTS value) ?

    An example, between several, of surely honnest people :

    stivut`s Geekbench3 - Multi Core score: 22963 points with a Core i7 7700K

     

    By not being specific enough, you may force folks contributing to HWBOT to rebench and resubmit because you might decide to block their submission. End of my story

  6. Noticed a score using hwinfo64 instead of hwmonitor, is that allowed? Don't want the guy to be disappointed in a few weeks time...

     

     

     

    Yeah lol I remember back when I was starting out I screwed up a whole bunch of scores like that, had to rebench ~10 different things.

     

     

    how useful is the link with all the system details ....?

     

    hwmonitor, how serious is that when you can change the tjmax in the .ini file...?

    same with core temp with adjust offset, same with hwinfo. ok, that does not change cpu or package temp...

     

    but what is cpu temp anyways: is it cpu temp, package temp, a core temp....????

     

    please be technical and precise or don't pretend to be enforcing useful rules hwbot...

  7. The impact is also the best z97 board all around for cpu, it clocks cpu the best as well as clocking ram better than any other maximus board due to 2 dimm slots. I have one and it is a very good OC board, even with it's quirks.

     

    squirks like dying prematurely? :D

     

    offtopic, i am told M8I is great but tends to die quickly... unlike M9 Apex. Wonder if M7I has the same issues...

  8. "Hello,

     

    An HWBOT moderator, "websmile", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'.

     

    This was the reason the user gave:

     

    Please check example screenshot, launch app is mandatory

     

    You can view your result here:

    http://hwbot.org/submission/3666090_bolc_geekbench3___multi_core_core_i7_3770k_18121_points"

     

     

    haha laughing my ass off. anyways gotta resubmit with 4790k to have slightly better

     

    now, to be even more critical, what is the point of this link if the launched app needs to be shown...?

    System manufacturer System Product Name - Geekbench Browser

  9. Maybe you should learn which league allows which cooling ;) - apprentice allows subzero with single stage, dice and chiller which is extreme cooling in limits below LN2 and cascade.

     

    I know this league allows subzero with di, petlier, etc. Thank you for the advice anyways...

     

     

    my confusion was based on stage 3 = wprim32m allows apprenctice hence no monitoring required

    and stage 2 = geekbench3 stops at enthusiasts, so temp monitoring required

     

    2 vs 3 syndrom in the Edition & stage numbering, gb3...

     

    Thanks for the quick posts though

  10. I personnally still run 5.2.0.14... my g3258 would not run on ver. 6 and I stuck there.

     

    a friend and I tried 6.2.0.27 or 6.3.0.54 and had no difference at all with ver. 5.

     

    curious to see if 6.4.x adds anything...

  11. I have better ones from aerotracks but not tested yet. Suppose to be 3000 9-12-12,@2.1 ,corsair dominator platinum.

    My gskill tops at 2870 9-12-12 tight @2.15v

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

     

     

    Impressive ;) Very impressive !

     

    I might give a try at 2760 9-12-12-20-1T 108 or so, hopefully below 2 V... :o (hch9 is given up to 1.975 V by samsung?)

    and compare with XTU scores with PSC at 2550 8-11-8-27-1T 88...

     

    curious to see who wins... :D

×
×
  • Create New...