bolc
-
Posts
689 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by bolc
-
-
10 minutes ago, Rhadamanthis said:
interested if you sell
hi
I note that, thanks ! in italy ?
i see you are interested by ddr2 as well? I have a bunch of them. looking at performance for cas4 or cas5 ? these are d9, ballistix, all binned under spi32m
looking for ddr3 psc too or you are fully equipped?
++
-
For sale
In principle reserved to someone but if no answers by the end of the week, it goes for sale
2600 CAS8 @ 1.82 and 1.84 V passing spi32m.
On my former 4790k they also passes spi32m with 2 - 5 - 6 for tWTR tWTR and tWCL set in bios, but on my g3258 it can't. it boot windows but fails spi32m. I am pretty sure it is the imc and corresponding voltages
Asking price
50 excl shipping, within EU
Pictures with nickname to follow
- 1
-
Did you get to a positive end?
If not you may want to spam there
-
It keeps repeating itself ...
Wake up Mr Freeman, wake up, and smell the hashes... -
still watching prices, rha suzuki :D
-
thnaks.just looking to run XMP profile on ryzen2/3 in fact
-
hi
do you know if A1 layout is running fine on ryzen, say ryzen 2 or 3 ?
these 4000c18 are in good "external" condition?
Cheers
-
amazing 2500c9 and cool looking !
-
r u sure this is 900 mhz frequency ? all other contesters before and after you are 1000+ up to almost 1100 mhz
-
Suzuki is a serious guy, with awesome hardware ! the psc are really nice !
any thoughts what's the max frequency at spi32m for 1.9 V ? (don't run a test, expectations will suffice ;)) -
21 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:
Even older mobile 4 cores get a boost with heat... It is totally uncontrolable... There's no code change in the save file since a long time.. So we can't differentiate the versions anymore like we can with gpupi...
okidokie.
screenshot got mandatory at some point, oh yeah 1st of June.
a teammate told me about a sub with missing screenshot that got removed. and that 64bit is not allowed (personally, always used the 32bit v6.4.1.12 since this version corrected a bug such that people could modify their score).
June 01, 2019: limitation to 32 bit XTU version only, due to enhanced 64bit version being out. A verification screenshot is required for top 20 scores.
older submissions with or without screenshots are still valid, right ?
- 1
-
guys, you never know on which leg to dance...
"As newer versions of XTU do not produce a score which is on par with older versions, we are forced to take the hard decision to disable points for all XTU submissions. "
for gpupi, i didn't see the results being removed, but 2 categories were made.
i guess on big cpus (>6 c/12t), reruns can mean nothing and yield more inconsistencies, especially with high ram frequencies, but on 4c/8t or lower, as long as i can tell, results seemed very consistent on all ddr3 platforms from sandy to haswell.
on ddr4, I don't know.
imo, kill it for ddr4 but not for ddr3 or kill the new version or benching on new cpus
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
nice price ! too bad we are separated by an ocean...
- 1
-
Bravo, triple bravo !!!
-
12 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:
Wrong backround on 06 Pete.
sad but true. I did nt want to be the party pooper but as things go, I may add the link now...
-
does the competition rules say that the sub should comply with hwbot rules ?
i guess you can have scores valid for a comp but invalid on hwbot hence not making points on hwbot ?
-
look for incorrect backgrounds and you will get some reshuffling of the 1st place
The Silver may get the 1st in the end ! ? -
am i lost or this says system info ver 5.3 ...?
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/36500627?
https://hwbot.org/submission/4168434
https://benchmarks.ul.com/systeminfoi thought 5.18 was the latest since May 2... unless the mods tell us that for hd5450 it does not matter to have old system info version, most results will not be valid...?
-
8086k@5.5GHz
in Sold
On 3/28/2019 at 9:15 PM, Berhof007 said:https://hwbot.org/submission/4107951_kos_cinebench___r15_core_i7_8086k_1902_cb
Best CB result for 6C CPUs on water I found.the screenshot is not valid
-
On 5/21/2019 at 11:49 AM, Fasttrack said:
^^^^^^^^^
To the OP.
@Noxinite , what Alex says so straight forward is the absolute truth. Either we all like it or not.
Dimastech scam was one of the most severe cases, that affected quite a few members here and people lost thousands and thousands of Euros from a supposed " reputable company "
Mate, you have to move on. This is not eBay and definitely, since the last resort of protection ( PayPal ) was mistakenly not used from your side, you have two options -
1) Give it a shot with Intel and see if you can pass an RMA request.
2) If it fails, consider the whole case a lesson that cost you 500 Euros. And take appropriate precaution if and when you buy something else here.
The HWBOT market place has some basic rules, but no power to intervene when a transaction goes south.
Basically, till a few years back, members ethics were at a lot higher level.
Good luck to whatever you decide to do. I am sorry for your mishap mate
on some forums they'd get banned for this
-
23 hours ago, King K0r3 said:
2*2GB Corsair Dominator GT 2000 8-8-8-24 2.1 1.65
Tell me what do you pay for if you are interested.
Where are you from?
He is from France
are they working or they are dead?
-
2 minutes ago, TaPaKaH said:
On the topic of shipping any payment insurances:
As someone whose packing methods are somewhat praised in this thread, yet who had to multiple refunds this year alone, I can say that unless you record (with a video, or via an independent witness) the whole process of packing and handing the item over to the shipping company and the recipient does the same in the opposite direction - any successful shipping damage claim that you file against a courier is a result of their incompetence. The current practice, also actively advised by the big consulting firms I happen to work for, is to direct handling of all customer claims to a court (or some third party), where the customer will be very likely to dismiss their claim as (a) they have to provide proof that would exclude any other source of damage, (b) they would have to handle the legal fees unless themselves are a (wannabe) law practitioner (c) case handlers tend to be overloaded so hearings are scheduled many years after the precedent, when no one really cares anymore.
what you are saying is that chances are close to 0 ; the insurance would actually only hold if they'd loose the package?
-
i was quoting the statement that the test should have been done in a z170
-
16 minutes ago, Fasttrack said:
I will second that, unfortunately
well that should not burn the cpu, or break its die...? mistake yes, but not the reason for the cleaved, dead die.
so either you mounted it badly and broke it, or it arrived this way. is the above picture of the as-received item ?
[FS] PSC ram 2x2 Gb @ 2600 cas8 1.84 V
in Sold
Posted
thanks.
would you know for 7700k ? 5 @ 1.22 V
i am selling my oc parts, i suppose r5 3600 to come, plain and simple