Gumanoid

replied to personal messages

of course, but it does not matter now.

the screenshot has nothing to do with this issue. It's a thought out loud.

Guys, cheating and a non-ideal screenshot are two different things, but now on the hwbot between these things the sign of equality.

Personally, I did not encounter this problem or did not pay attention. I do not have many results with processors below K6-2. Disturbing is not precisely this situation, but the situation as a whole, all this negative atmosphere. Personally, you have no complaints, you do your job and it's always pleasant to compete with you.

I agree, but cheating and making screenshots are a bit different things. for example there are 3 results, in the first two cases the screenshots are made completely by the rules, and in the third there are minor violations and the moderator understands this. Enrages that a person does not try to understand what caused these violations. Approach to the issue is your problem, it's wrong. Each situation is individual and you can always ask for additional confirmation and not immediately ban. I get the impression that we are talking about different things. If the overclocker was caught in cheating - I would ban him forever. But if there are no questions to the result, but there are shortcomings in the screenshot, why not specify them at once? Why ban after a week / month / year? People see, wait until the time runs out and then complain - is this fair play you think?

And I felt sore. What's happening on hwbot lately? who are we? Overclockers? benchers? or "screenshoters"? the results are deleted and blocked without a real reason! All perfectly understand that the result is correctly received, but the window is not in the wrong place = ban. What if I can not physically place all windows at 1280*1024 resolution? There are frames of the reasonable and human factor. Therefore, moderators are people, not bots. What prevents ask before blocking? But most of all enrages that everything is formal approach.The man presses the "block" button realizing that the result is good in itself, but there is a "snitch" who instead of overclocking looks at the results stupidly and finds some minor flaws. What's wrong with you guys? Ten years ago, there was no such crap. all overclockers bench for fun! By your actions you discourage motivation for new achievements. Is this the purpose of the hwbot today? p.s. Turrican did not want the hwbot to be the way it was now. It's a shame...

Thanks Mr.Paco, I also could boot dual Mendocino on Abit VP6, but system was not stable at 400MHz and higher clocks (no matter what default CPU Speed).

[quote] You jump started the thread , making it the official bonus round thread ... and you dont have any answers ? Just questions and remarks ? Since you decited to open up this thread , why not prepare a basic description in your opening post ? What's this bonus round for ? Which is the hardware allowed ? What are the stages ? Wallpaper ... and so on. Have a look at the other official round threads of this season. [/quote] Why the moderators do not track the beginning of each round and in a timely manner do not create a discussion with a description, a wallpaper, etc. I needed a wallpaper since there was a little LN2 and it was necessary to get basic results.

Thanks man.

The round began, but there is no Wallpaper. Give us a link please.

Where did you get it? Thanks.

Wallpaper?

Wallpaper for bonus round?

Again, what about muti cpu at bonus round?

Thanks a lot.

Nice score!

Not allowed

Why 3DMARK - CLOUD GATE closed? It's ok?

Gold words.

No, not at all. GRIFF can "like" any posts and my opinion does not depend on it. it was enough for me to confirm the video to understand that he was not cheating. Yes, why not? AMD sorted best processor cores at factory. I read old articles in those days and reviewers wrote about it. "Orion" core name is a marketing move to make products more attractive. There are many steppings of "Coppermine" core from сA2 to cD0. and of course there is a difference in overclocking possibilities, but it steel Coppermine core! But I've seen PIII 550MHz second cB0 stepping that can do 1GHz and higher on air! So why do you think a Pluto 800 can not do 1200MHz?

I agree with you. Pluto and Orion is a same core and no difference in silicon.

@TASOS What wrong with you? @GRIFF shows video with 800 core marked processor! I don't understand your resentment...

I don't understand, You think GRIFF is cheating? I don't think so.