Everything posted by TeamAU
-
WHATS UP WITH 3d11!!??
actually Vinbo i used to think the same thing about 05 as you, it certainly has a large "whoever tests the most cpus wins" type element to it, but it also has alot of room to move in tweaking, each to their own, but for me, for a benchmark to be worth running, i need to get some benefit if i invest my time into tweaking it, with both heaven and 11 there isnt much there, sure heaven has a few little quirks we can use to get a few points.. but 11 is fairly tight like vantage.. both have a few things, but nothing in the realms of 3d01, 03, 05, etc.. that being said, im not a big heaven fan and would like to see 11 being benched, but why not pick 11 x, that way we have a benchmark that at least for a while is going to be predominantly GPU power.. then we have a genuine benchmark that you need some 4-way handling skills and requires heavy GPU power.. lets face it 4-way vantage is totally driven by CPU power now, you can have 4 average GPU's and a great CPU and take WR..
- SniperOZ - Radeon HD 5870 @ 1320/1320MHz - 449809 marks Aquamark
-
MrPaco - Pentium 4 521 @ 4127.6MHz - 18532 marks PCMark 2005
theres no way xp is faster than w7/vista in transparent windows.. its only if you dont enable Aero or are usign a GPU that doesnt support it, xp has always been faster in a bunch of those system based tests, so that doesnt surprise.. the only thing that pops up at me in the face when i look at this score is the audio encoder being out of line with other people on the same setup... my only though it perhaps a recent futuremark patch has enabled something that helps audio encoder in xp? like it did bringing video encoding up.. i always hate to speculate without testing though.. other than audio, score looks good though..
-
ASUS GTX 580 Matrix (Platinum Edition) pictures
i think you dont need hard mods on this card though, bios flash can increase the volts as needed
- pro - Core i5 2500K @ 5148MHz - 40931 marks PCMark 2005
- subzero - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 40925 marks PCMark 2005
- k|ngp|n - Core i7 2600K @ 5882MHz - 5min 41sec 687ms SuperPi 32m
- k|ngp|n - GeForce GTX 275 @ 1390/1401MHz - 136966 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- NickShih - GeForce GTX 580 @ 1661/1250MHz - 186648 marks 3DMark03
-
PCMark05: Pixel Shader test?
powertoy doesnt impact pixel shader.. i dunno i think its not a problem right, maybe these guys just know something the rest of us dont.. i notice most of these are sandy except for the 8600, has anyone tested if sandy is just faster at pixel shader than x58? i dunno i will play pixel shader later this week..
- SuicidePhoenix - GeForce GTX 285 @ 1100/1450MHz - 135765 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- k|ngp|n - GeForce GTX 275 @ 1343/1356MHz - 135858 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- pro - Core i7 Extreme 990X @ 6142MHz - 41465 marks PCMark 2005
- topdog - Core i7 2600K @ 5616MHz - 40803 marks PCMark 2005
-
dinos22 - GeForce GTX 295 @ 688/1203MHz - 120444 marks 3DMark2001 SE
gimmick? response to tactical vest?
- Deanzo - Radeon HD 5870 @ 1200/1200MHz - 483742 marks Aquamark
- dinos22 - GeForce GTX 275 @ 1350/1440MHz - 133007 marks 3DMark2001 SE
-
Overclockear finds rev4 screenshot
Ocleaks coming soon....
- TiN - 4x GeForce GTX 580 @ 1150/1150MHz - 79364 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance
- pro - Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 6387MHz - 5min 38sec 828ms SuperPi 32m
- pro - Core i7 Extreme 980X @ 6387MHz - 5min 38sec 828ms SuperPi 32m
- pro - GeForce GTX 480 @ 868/1101MHz - 56898 marks 3DMark05
- pro - Core i7 Extreme 990X @ 6816MHz - 12.5 sec PiFast
- S_A_V - Core i7 Extreme 990X @ 6199MHz - 5min 54sec 578ms SuperPi 32m
- pro - Core i7 Extreme 990X @ 6142MHz - 41465 marks PCMark 2005