TeamAU

its a great result for sure dinos111, i like to see you coming to play pcmark05 against me!

lol sure yes it seems i just made up a new memory divider, asus/gigabyte can we please make this happen? i dont want to hear about platform limitations either... 250 bus is what i was meaning to say

well at 200 * 22.5 it is all too easy, standard bus speed, just set the ram ratio to 2000 mhz, set the nb and run your bench

wow this is an interesting result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=2109251,2109257,2109240&title=MASSMAN%20IS%20F%28L%29UCKING%20IDIOT

wow this is an interesting result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=2109251,2109257,2109240&title=MASSMAN%20IS%20F%28L%29UCKING%20IDIOT

okay perfect, i was hoping we wernt going to see any 200 * 22.5 on amd!

can frequency be 4500.x or does it need to be below 4500.x?

holy shit that looks fast dude, im WAY out on X48 platform, damn

sandy bridge doesnt really fit the criteria of max mem clock, it is so dependant on CPU and max bclk it sort of goes against all the other rounds of this comp

monster chip dude

955 7.1? wtf?? chew on that

WTF showing off the gtx580 like it made some difference to your 32m time, dude this is just the type of shameless marketing that is destroying our hobby! i hope you have a SUCK christmas!

looks like massman is once again starting competitions to benefit his knowledge on a particular platform...

yes actually as a benchmark it seems good... very similar to vantage xtreme where when in 4 way CPU clocks have minimum impact on GT... i dont see hardly any scaling past 6 cores... i havnt done direct comparison, but cpu tests in amd/intel arnt that much different so it will totally depend how the GT looks between the platforms..

a rich rig and one poor bastard driving it

i think its fair enough that we as a community pay futuremark if the bench in question meets the requirements we need it to meet, some of the key to me being, * flexing up to date hardware, dx11 - TICK * heavy on GPU when it first comes out - TICK * good level of security built in - this bench is a step backwards from 03,05,06,vantage which is a step backwards again from 3d01 * subtests visually available - we really need to see some GT and CPU/combined FPS without going into the results.xml and digging them out.. I think futuremark have delivered the hard parts of the deal, but left a couple of the minor parts out.. Unfortunately in my personal opinion the security of this bench is a deal breaker, as far as i can see any score the user wants can be punched in and submitted to ORB with a ease unlike any other bench...

haha nice mate, look forward to it!

haha nice mate, look forward to it!

i am not sure if anyone mentioned this, but the security on this benchmark is the worst i have seen, there might as well be no security, one can choose their score and submit whatever they please.. as a benchmark to use as a community, this is not something that i think should be scored on HWBOT until valid security is in place...

id feel very sorry for female oc team.. just look what happen to jasmine after meeting some oc'ers.. to be honest i think everyone should qualify, if you want to go to complete in oc event, qualify your way there..

the difficulty of this setup can't be underestimated.. very nice result..

Post busters I ain't afraid of no POST

Please this is a very serious issue, NO MESSING AROUND, i have taken time out of my busy schedule to develop what i feel is a very elegant and suitable logo, please vote on it as you see fit!

hey George, are you going to start congratulating people in their threads? then we know its time to worry!