Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Leeghoofd

Crew
  • Posts

    13455
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    711

Everything posted by Leeghoofd

  1. I know that but if some start in Russian, the Italians do their thing, why not throw some Arabic in the mix, who can read or flollow up on the forum postrs. The options are English or English... nothing more, nothing less...
  2. HWBOT is an international website, thus with an english forum. Hence everybody can follow it,
  3. guys no russian... pulling all these posts
  4. Thanks Gregor for all the work you did. Much respect bro what you, Carl, PJ, Frederik, Michael and Chris pulled off, to make this free service enjoyable. I withdrew from the conversation as K5 and all this old hardware is not my cup of tea, however if I look back on 2018 alone many of the OSIBS subs have been heavily discussed over and over again regarding the the validity of many submissions or the hardware being used. You can draw your own conclusions on who's too blame... Seems the centrum of the universe nitwit wins again by using an abundant, probably in his point of view a democratic usage of words. Give yourselves a big cheer and a tap on the back. Another amazing achievement: Self Destructive mode is fully unlocked. However this unexpected departure means the bot's evolution might come to a halt, and this from right now: There might not be any more future hardware additions to the Bot's database. Thanks to those that supported Gregor and the BOT for its free service. To the others; if you don't like it here, why don't you go and play somewhere else where it is much better structurized, better moderated and where you can all have your little saying ... Just let us be happy in our elite biased bubble.... Democracy stopped right here, right now... if one ever pulls this word out of the hat again or starts to copy paste the entire wikipedia to waste my time and lecture me, I'll ban him without even blinking... You all have been officially warned.
  5. what are you exactly trying to do ?
  6. you got proof for such bold claims...
  7. No clue, only installed OS at stock speeds. But we have memory issues with the chipset, 2133 is no go and triple channel is tough even at 1866
  8. The line is your own selfrespect and principles sir... impossible to lay down... and verify
  9. yep it is done, thx for adding the screenshot
  10. Lol the Bot ended up this way due to the acts of many of your fellow overclockers, who couldn't play nice and keep it fair. Because they all thought they would end up on the payrole of some big vendor and greed took over. The verification screenshots are like they are and will be imposed as is. Sorry but the 1280x 1024 resolution is a mute call, I have done most of my 2D subs on that resolution. Secondly we are 2018 already aren't we ? For another of you arguments: If you think we have the time to ask to 20-30 people daily to redo their screenshot or to ask for other verification , how on earth can we keep track ? The rules have been laid down by our predecessors, again in a reaction to the aforementioned reasons. Also if we don't maintain a strict handling of subs and allow the score for person A , but not for person B... how big of a mess will that be after a few months... I keep on repeating this but OC is a selfdestructive something... if everybody played fair we would not be here... if you have a score that is out of proportion, you know something is wrong, yet many take the chance and hope it will slip through... one day somebody will spot it and it will get removed...
  11. Have you tried the above workaround from TAGG ? this worked for me. And that attitude won't get you anywhere fyi, elite or not Edit: you got PM who to contact
  12. depends on the benchmark and CPU used
  13. Competition Background must be visible
  14. Don,'t forget the mobo tab for your final score!!!!
  15. That result was done on 3.2... Again why would AMD destroy the advantage they have/had over the Intel counterparts so dramatically, that's the million dollar question... a coders error ?
  16. I just made a quick apples to oranges comparison as in the previous post Johannes... but honestly you feel the 52 sec score is right for this CPU generation? Take another old 4 core, the 3570K at 4500Mhz beaing beaten by an APU with 500Mhz less on the cores and lower memory speed... Llano is far from that good... 1 min 40 seems reasonable to me... Yes Intels OpenCL is inferior, hence why we mostly run the AMD SDK drivers :p Yes it is the Agesa code, but million dollar question is why did AMD hamper its performance in newer AGESA codes?. Did some other users run into issues when using software based on similar instruction sets... normally we can expect a few percentages loss in efficieny for added compatibility but not this... this is out of the world...
  17. No it is not doing the work, that just the thing, it is somehow bugging the output of the GPUPI benchmark, Comon imagine a Llano at 5Ghz doing a WR beating Intel's superiority running at 7ghz, but sucks at any other app like Superpi or other simple 2D stuff... not gonna happen on my watch... Your 2001 comparison is a benchmark where CPU speed has taken over from the GPU... nothing to do with a bios version that would double the output on identical hardware.... Also it proves the FX was all about sick clockspeeds and crap at anything else. Now we had special 2D biosses before ( eg rampage extreme) but effie was a few percentages not like this.... This one goes from 2 min 40 to under a minute for the same clockspeeds... now that's an unexpected boost :p Putting these APUs amongst more powerful at anything processors :p I'll try the initial release bios on the asus tonite and check back... However no matter the outcome I think the most logic to do is to remove the current super fast scores in this benchmark to maintain the validity, moderability and credibility of the benchmark.
  18. I will verify tonite, but I thought it was on one of the early biosses. However like I mentioned before, these runs with the old Agesa are in the neighbourhood of the improved 3.3 (looking at the eficiency) and in the league of 4500Mhz Ivy CPUs, that can't be right. imagine running 3.3 on the old Agesa you would be in Kaby lake vicinity :p
  19. It is listed at HWBOT as integrated GPU... so hence why it is allowed for this stage... but again Team Cup is not won in one stage For the below, disabling cores has never been allowed, in contradiction to unlocking cores
×
×
  • Create New...