Everything posted by Leeghoofd
-
New WR at 8461.51 MHz
congratz Andre, now attack 01 WR
- HybridChiller - Core i7 2600K @ 5540MHz - 6min 9sec 203ms SuperPi 32m
- BenchZowner - GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb @ 999/999MHz - 56964 marks 3DMark03
- Stelaras - Core i7 2600K @ 5807.4MHz - 6sec 328ms SuperPi
-
Vga sharing noticed
So this thread can rest in peace now ?
- nedernakker - 2x GeForce 8800 GTX @ 864/1107MHz - 97258 marks 3DMark03
- Splave - 4x Radeon HD 6990 @ 995/1500MHz - 6333.45 DX11 Marks Unigine Heaven - Xtreme Preset (DX11)
- Pcjunkie209 - Core i7 2700K @ 4513.3MHz - 8sec 250ms SuperPi
- dinos22 - FX-8150 @ 8149.6MHz - 8149.59 mhz CPU Frequency
-
AMD PSCHECK for Bulldozer
http://www.mediafire.com/?9i678uh9d7ob878
-
AMD PSCHECK for Bulldozer
thank you sir !! possible to up again ?
- louislkw - 4x Core i7 2600K @ 5317.4MHz - 4sec 665ms wPrime 32m
- dinos22 - FX-8150 @ 7756.8MHz - 7756.75 mhz CPU Frequency
- leeghoofd - GeForce GTX 570 @ 850/1055MHz - 129660 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- Viss - GeForce GTX 580 @ 1000/1150MHz - 134145 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- Expat GriZ - Core i5 2500K @ 5917.4MHz - 5min 51sec 828ms SuperPi 32m
- The official MSI Return to the Celeron thread.
- Expat GriZ - Core i5 2500K @ 5917.4MHz - 5min 51sec 828ms SuperPi 32m
-
All you FX reviewers did it wrong !!
I made a similar comment yesterday at the blog PJ that numbers with a more powerfull card can give a totally different outcome. I stated that with the 6970 things start to get very GPU limited. Guess what : post are still under moderation
-
All you FX reviewers did it wrong !!
- All you FX reviewers did it wrong !!
I have no issues if anyone recommends it, that's your own choice. And most reviewers iwll prolly have a good reason/conclusion to back it up. But the site mentioned in the OP is getting a bit famous here at Hwbot with their ratings and awards. Some extracts : The review itself says the that the price is not good atm , yet they give it a value award, beats me how that lines up...The OCing comment is marvellous too... Games have been nicely run at almost exactly AMD specs, trash the GPU and you get similar results accross most CPUs... This CPU is not as bad as many think for daily users, most biggest issue is the heatoutput and powerusage... and yes it's still way overpriced... for benchers it is worthless... And for the AMD blog they have to tell us something don't they... and everyone tests a game at different way, you can't compare results unless there's a build in benchmark thingy (that's gives a reliable output)... so his comments are a bit silly...- And this is the guy that leads hwbot.org
Sorry no you are german, request overruled... only allowed freebies for SOF- SoF - GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb @ 987/957MHz - 388408 marks Aquamark
- Overclocking videos
Nice one, too bad the architecture is limited for us benchers to a few tests... my board screamed at 6.6ghz already 8 cores- All you FX reviewers did it wrong !!
I tested win 8 and it gives a tiny bit better performance due to improved task scheduler over Win7. Improvements : 1-4%, it still doesn't cut it at all... new word is the disabling of cores/threads to boost performance and lower power draw... - All you FX reviewers did it wrong !!