Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
  • Posts

    3655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by TaPaKaH

  1. Agreed.

    Just a few things to consider:

    • does BenchMate work with legacy systems? (talking WinXP and much older)
    • does BenchMate require external dependencies that might hurt performance?
    • does BenchMate cause a higher CPU load than CPU-Z? (opening the latter can sometimes be harder than passing Spi 32M)
    • Like 3
  2. Now that mainstream CPUs from both sides get 16 cores, wouldn't it be the right time to ask ourselves if we actually need to split CPU globals per number of cores?

    Back when the split was introduced, there were maximum three relevant classes (1,2,4) with a HUGE difference in between. But these days you have at least fourteen (1/2/3/4/5/6/8/10/12/14/16/18/24/32) and it doesn't look like it's going to get any simpler with all the 'exciting' ways that manufacturers can customise their CPU layouts.

    It's starting to get very similar to situation with GPU rankings:

    • CPUs have 2/3-digit core count, GPUs have 2/3-digit ROP count
    • Given core count can be achieved by 1 or 2 cpus (or even core types), given ROP count can be achieved by 1 or 2 cards
    • It's very rare that nVidia and AMD release graphic cards with the same ROP count (or even at the same price point) to avoid direct comparisons, Intel/AMD will likely eventually get there too

    ...and I don't see anyone discussing splitting GPU ranks per ROP count "to give guys with GTX3060 a chance and make it more affordable"

    • Like 6
  3. Please don't follow the urge to collect memory kits. Collectors are the plague of the benching community. Items made in low volumes are hard to find as they are, and people who let them fall apart in their drawers to satisfy their ego aren't exactly helping.

    • Like 5
    • Confused 1
  4. The switch happened only on kits whose specs allowed for it. As much as G.Skill would like to use cheaper ICs on, say, 2400C8 PI, there simply aren't any alternatives out there.

    It's not impossible to find 1600C7 with X-series that are new, but chances are those won't be good.

    Normally most 2200 9-9-9 kits are BBSE, but from the seventh digit of the bottom marking, I see it's a "C" or a "D", indicating Elpida BCxx (which officially never existed) or BDBG/BDSE.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...