1BadMoJoe

Ticket ID: 855 Priority: Medium I have a ATI x800 AGP card that is not in the data base. As I researched into the already submited AGP cards, they have at the top of the GPU-Z video card name, the GTO/PRO/VE/XL/XT-PE in subcatagories, the video cards are labeled as such.\r\n \r\nThe video I have is labeled as \"Series\" and lacks any spasific higher ranked desination above a plain jane x800. Being that I am the one testing the overclockabilities of this card...it has been bined by the manufacturer correctly, if refuses to go over 520/520 and 3Dmark03 fails to pass at 425/425 and has random lockups at various later stages within 3Dmark03. I just now as typing this got the card to pass at 400/400 in 3dmark03. This card is a lemon for as old it is.\r\n I purchased this card in a large computer store after pci-e socket775 motherboards were available. I made the choice to stick with s478 and just upgrade from an nVidia fx5200 ultra to an Ati x800 video card. Quite a long time ago, as it turned out, I skiped the whole socket 775 generation.\r\n\r\n http://i41.tinypic.com/zxl82o.jpg\r\n\r\nI also need two motherboards added to the data base so I can submit \" referance clock submisions \"\r\n\r\n\r\nThis is for an Intel motherboard D865GLC\r\n http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=980120 This is for a PC-Chips M598, this motherboard has no network addaptor to connect to the internet and cpu-z save varification file fails on this motherboard, this all available information. \r\n http://hwbot.org/community/submission/966453_1badmojoe_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_735.75_sec

If I remember correctly I was submitting mx200 video card submitals within a few hours prior to this submision and noticed the April contest and seen that this motherboard had this integrated graphics chip in it. This setup was already on the bench and I went with it.

LOLZ, hastly taken pictures prior to run, yes that is a nVidia gforce2 mx200 agp card. But the submision is the correct integrated graphics submision. The s478 i845G chipset motherboard, mx200 and the integrated graphics are not crossfire/link compatable. I was the first to file a submision and I know someone else will beat this old setup by a long shot.

your submission does not comply(error) Only make submissions with a integrated videocard. your submission does not comply(error)A verification link is required. The submision page is kicking out this 82845G Integrated Graphics stating it is not an integrated graphics??? I used the pull down list in the videocard for my intergated chip this is listed. What is the verifcation link? what box does this link go into? Automated verifcation system is looking for a link in a screenshot shot entry box? This is my link: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9572160

Ticket ID: 850 Priority: Medium Hello I need two motherboards added to the data base so I can submit \" referance clock submisions \"\r\n\r\n\r\nThis is for an Intel motherboard D865GLC\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nThis is for a PC-Chips M958, this motherboard has no network addaptor to connect to the internet and cpu-z save varification file fails on this motherboard this all available information. \r\n http://hwbot.org/community/submission/966453_1badmojoe_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_735.75_sec

Keep up pushing super7, nice collection of cpus' and boards you have there. I will be joining you shortly, up for a challange;P

Nice work on pushing the super7

Ticket ID: 838 Priority: Low Hello, I have a pc-chips M598 motherboard I would like to add to the motherboard data base. below is a screen shot of cupid.\r\n\r\nhttp://hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=335858&thumb=false&iehack=.jpg\r\n\r\n(un)fortunately I have had this motherboard for about 10 years, I must have a one off because it will not die and rarely gives me any problems. To bad I can not push it beyound 100fsb.

Photo of mother board can be found in the March HWbot chalange, I realy need this motherboard added to data base for the "Refeeance Clock" submitals, this is the best motherboard I have for now in the s487. http://hwbot.org/competition/hoc_mar10 http://hwbot.org/community/submission/968213_1badmojoe_wprime_32m_pentium_4_2.4ghz_b_northwood__1min_48sec_78ms

I have three s478 I've just finished messing around with, sadly two motherboards have unlockable pll and the last ones a "DELL" with a CY28323 pll and unbearable bios that I find lacking in ability for voltage adjustments. I need a p4c800 e deluxe or an msi neo2-fisr now more than ever

Ticket ID: 819 Priority: Low Hello, I\'m having a bit of a problem submitting \"Refereance Clock\" submisions with Dell motherboard. Dell in the day had \"special\" motherboards made just for them and this motherboard has done nothing but piss me off more than once.\r\n\r\n I am severly limited with this \"DELL\" setup, (un)fortunately it performs better than the two other s478 locked crystal plls\' motherboards I\'ve used. Below is a cpu-z id that states the motherboard brand \"DELL\" and the model number \" 02X378\" any chance of having this motherboard added to the data base so I can get a few refereance clocks submited with this oddball motherboard manufacturer? \r\n\r\n http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1048692

Hello, I'm a bit confused on the two Pentium 4 2.4Ghz Northwoods - A and B. I need help identifying the differences between the two. I think one runs at a 100fsb(Pentium A) and the other runs on 133fsb(Pentium B). The 2.4Ghz prescott and the 2.4Ghz HT types are easy enough to identify. When looking at my CPU-Z ID program what am I to look for to see the difference between the Pent.4 2.4Ghz(A)? and the Pent. 2.4Ghz (B)? to properly submit my scores in the correct category. I also have the ability to look on the cores itself, but the core is currently being benched. The top line on the core I vaguely remember looked like in this format 2.40GHZ/512/xxx/x.xx v Thank you and best regards 1Badmojoe

Yes you are correct it does in fact have only 128kb on cache, we can agree that this CPU is a k6-2+ 500MHz? In second post there are cross referenced CPUIDs' of exact matches to the misplaced submitter in question (shadow hunter). If this is true, it is still misplaced in the k6-2 533MHz category and should be properly placed in the k6-2+ 500 subclass where it belongs? P.S. I edited my above posts earlier before your response. But the incorrect subject header I could not change, away from my earlier misdiagnosis as I gathered more correct information. I continued to look into the matter after my 1st post in which I discovered the correct CPUID in an attempt to supply the most correct relevant information around the time of the second post.

Mistaken CPU-ID I just cross referanced it...This is a K6-II+ 500Mhz Samples below show the same CPU-Z cpuID, sorry bout the confusion but it still in the incorrect class and should be reloctated-I have flaged the three score posts above to the submitter -or- someone else can phyicaly move them for him? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/922134_nom_yeslinux_cpu_z_k6_2_500mhz_632.99_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/857873_kolian_cpu_z_k6_2_500mhz_577.51_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/958954_nom_yeslinux_superpi_k6_2_500mhz_4min_49sec_125ms

A shadow hunter http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678513_shadow_hunter_cpu_z_k6_2_533mhz_533.5_mhz http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678528_shadow_hunter_superpi_k6_2_533mhz_6min_35sec_200ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/678527_shadow_hunter_pifast_k6_2_533mhz_722.83_sec This is a k6-2+ 500MHz in a k6-II 533 class, User accidently placed a K6-II+500MHz in an uncorrect catagory please confer to the CPU-Z ID (exibt1)Model"D" and (exibit2)EXT.model"D", the (exibit3)Level2 cache (exibit4)Name states it is a K6-III+ CPU (exibit5) instuctions list it having MMX 3DNow!+, This "rare" CPU does not match a common K6-II 533 CPU-Z ID. I think it is a K6-II+ 500MHz

I don't know, because for some reason I can not see the post...unless there is a private thread option enabled?

Ticket ID: 809 Priority: Medium I have a video card I would like to be added, I see other types of fire gl but not the one I have. Picture below may have relavant info needed to add to data base, Thank you and best regards 1BadMoJoe\r\n\r\nhttp://i48.tinypic.com/2ai1ze0.jpg

Anyone seen this problem before, it only appears at high speed freq. and at an end of a run after the first run? AquaMark Termination Exception Error Exception_Access_Violation

Hello, I was wondering about 3Dmark01 and which tests are to be used? The rules don't quite clearly state if all of them are to be used or the first group ending with Nature. Here is a fellow whom did all the tests and beat everyone by a large margin, concidering all the tests are calculated into this score. Of course the rules are a bit unclear on this matter, mind explaing to me. If it's only to be the first four tests what are we to do with this result? http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/948599_buttons_3dmark_2001_radeon_x600_se_15147_marks

Thank you, Yes true 1999 or so, it feels like its been more than 15 years looking out for it. I had an oppurtunity to purchase a K6-III+550 last week, but I felt the price of around $100 us dollars was a bit high for a used one. But I did purchase a new sealed unused K6-II+ 500ACR and I think a used K6-II 380AFR both for less than $20 US dollars, both of which I plan to bench and post sometime in the future.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/k6_3_400mhz CPU_Z 689.53Mhz by DDC This CPU used is a k6-III+ 400Mhz it is identified as such with a "D" model and EXT. model extention that are in all "k6-II+" and "k6-III+" within cpu cpuid identifier. Also labeled across the top line of information NAME line this CPU is labeled as such "AMD K6-III+" This in itself is a updated newer 0.18-micron model version within the k6 III family which has MMX, Extended 3DNow, PowerNow capablities beyound of the k6 III regular model in the 5/6/9/9 cupid identifiers. The cupid identifiers for a k6-III+ CPU will show as 5/6/D/D. This RARE processor along with k6-IIIE+ should be in a subclass within the K6-III also with K6-III+ 450 , K6-III+ 500 , K6-III+ 550. There may also be the rarest and undocumented K6-III 600+ but in over 15 years of keeping an eye out for it, I personally never have varified the true existance of the few 600 said to exisist. I think Massman has played around with K6 types of CPUs' he may also shed some light on this misplaced CPU. As being the case this proccesor is currently in first place moving this processor to its own subclass will not impact the place cup standings this processor has earned.

Hello, I personally also made the same mistake in this socket 775 class. I was looking at other submissions and noticed s478 cpus' listed, so I entered my submissions. I recently noticed pentium 512 are a socket 775 cpu and I deleated all of my submissions in the class. I also went though every single submision and flaged cpu-z picture provided submisions that showed an s487 cpu in the provided picture. I also cross referenced the motherboard used in a few cases that cpu-z provided picture was not shown but a listing of motherboard used was, I then flaged the users useing a s478 motherboard in the 775 motherboard class. In otherwords I flaged about 10 submisions in the pentium 4 512 Might need to look at that class and see how much damage I did in the rakings in this processor class, sorry for the confussion, but I think it would be fair for other submiters not to make the same mistake as I had when I only looked at other submiters cpu-z pictures and thought I was in the correct class. I just hope the submiters dont just errase the clues of type of cpu and motherboard used and resubmit the same score posts possablely again in the wrong cpu class. I personaly forfited two or three cups in this cpu class so the pain is felt here deeply for everyones' mistakes.

Ticket ID: 798 Priority: Medium Hello,\r\nThis is my first video card I had from a LONG time ago. I dug it out and gave it new life to run around the block seeing that there was already a catagory for this sereis of mx 200 video card. I was dumbstruck at the low bench results compaired to simular cards already posted.\r\nI found the problem as to the bus type interface, all other cards posted are using AGP bus and I am useing oldschool PCI. Being the Bus interface of AGP is atleast x4 times the bandwidth of my PCI card is it possible to add a new PCI subcatagory to the mx 200 lineup?\r\n\r\nposted below is a screen shot of my first video card specs.\r\n http://i50.tinypic.com/2iatrts.jpg

Bump Same problem for this new score posted, rank is not calculated http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...gene_223.5_mhz Clearly with a screen shot and validation I may have pulled a thrid place finish here for Rampage II (gene) hardware cup

Same problem as the other one I posted it says "but rank is not calculated yet" This one a bit better so I deleated the earlier submital to try and fix, did not work. This submital hangs during calculation. http://hwbot.org/community/submission/956017_1badmojoe_reference_clock_rampage_ii_gene_223.5_mhz When I look to see the rank of the above posted results my rank is not posted, looks like something is hanging the submital from being ranked. http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/reference_clock/rankings?start=&hardware=rampage_ii_gene