Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

I.nfraR.ed

Members
  • Posts

    2437
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

I.nfraR.ed last won the day on November 20

I.nfraR.ed had the most liked content!

1 Follower

Converted

  • Location
    Bulgaria

Converted

  • Occupation
    Web Developer

Converted

  • realname
    Ivan

Recent Profile Visitors

14557 profile views

I.nfraR.ed's Achievements

Collaborator

Collaborator (7/14)

  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • First Post Rare

Recent Badges

465

Reputation

  1. True, but you still have the option to open in another tab/window via middle click or right click -> open in new tab/window. Same on mobile with tap & hold. But when the site forces it in another tab/window, you don't have the option anymore to open it in the same tab and some users might want exactly that. It doesn't matter that me and you prefer it opened in a new tab As a compromise, you would need to have an icon and a tooltip indicating that the link opens in another window. PS: Of course, if you're Apple, you decide what is best for the users and don't give them options
  2. Thanks! I will probably try it on LN2 in the following weeks, curious to see if I can get 6c #1.
  3. That's actually against good UX principles. I'm used to middle-click on links that I want to open in a new tab.
  4. Yes, it's also faster for 9900X and even 7000 series.
  5. Great run! I don't have backups and would need LN2 for more.
  6. Show us the 8.8GHz already! Great score.
  7. There's a problem with linking forum comments with a submission and it appears to assign the first commenter as the score owner, e.g. this is unity's submission. The link to the actual score is also gone, it seems.
  8. I use a browser plugin "dark reader" to make any site in dark mode, so that's not a big deal and I don't think a dark mode will ever be implemented in hwbot. It works well on most sites and you can turn off on site basis.
  9. Commenting on submissions from the site is not possible - Bad Request (400) in the browser console and absolutely no feedback in the UI.
  10. If that was designed from the ground up, have you considered a library with ready to use components and if yes, can you share the reason for the current approach? I personally like the styling of Tailwind. I know there are pros and cons with everything, but a library would possibly give you responsive layout out of the box, consistent styling, fonts, paddings, etc. For a small dev team and large site that might be the easier solution. Displaying large sets of data and forms on a site is one of the hardest things to design. As for the fonts, Verdana and Ariel are really outdated for the web, they must only be used as fallbacks. There are many modern web fonts that are much nicer, I personally used Rubik for my site, but a typical font-family definition looks like this: "Rubik", -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, "Helvetica Neue", Arial, sans-serif where "Rubik" is my embedded web font. It depends whether you want the same font on all devices or not. Other popular web fonts are Lato, Montserrat, Roboto, Noto Sans, Open Sans. You also need to account for localization, but I don't think that is a feature you're going to support. PS: I don't know what jquery is still used for, but the versoin is really old (from 2012). PS2: I feel few things are better, but overall there's no consistency and the perception is not that good - perhaps there aren't many common components and layouts and everything is done per page basis, which would be a nightmare to fix and support. There are also many UX issues, e.g. like tags/pills looking exactly the same as buttons, no loading indicators (page simply jumps when a container gets its data replaced), non-clickable elements like dropdown list items (you need to click on the text), inconsistent pointer style (cursor).
  11. I've already shown him my current best (10.178), so I loose, but will get back to it after FX-6300 comp. SMT off is a bit slower, but clocks higher and temps are lower. My issue is ccd1 and if I can't somehow get it sorted, I will have to buy a different chip. Difference between both ccds is huge: 400-500MHz.
  12. Probably will...and everybody would need to rebench again
  13. Thanks, it's just a quick test, but ccd1 is pretty bad I can't get it to pass above 5150 even on chiller, while ccd0 does 5600+ at the same conditions. This run is 5300/5150. Otherwise the cpu does well - fclk 2233 is only stable on cold, but posts on air. 8800 memory also posts.
×
×
  • Create New...