I.nfraR.ed

21H2

It's also possible with this one, but a 150 at a similar FSB in unganged mode would be an "easy" gold, yes. I was expecting to hit a bit over 6.1GHz which would have been enough for the current #1, but ran into different issues, so that's what I have for the moment. Would need another session to max it out and I also want to run 32M on XP where it does a bit higher FSB in unganged.

Excellent. Well done!

I'm counting on you, ale! I don't have a more suitable board right now.

I reckon higher is possible, just wasted too much LN2 fighting with the other board. If someone manages to run high FSB with Unganged mode it should be possible to beat it with a lower clock. A more efficient board could also make a change as this one is pretty slow in everything. Core-wise that's definitely not the limit of the CPU, the board is holding me back. I might try brute-forcing it with DDR2 board.

For geekbench3 it seems to be, according to the rules.

Thanks. This board is very inefficient, but my Giga ud3 didn't work well on cold Hopefully I will have time to try again next month.

Why 2T though?

Killing it :) Great work!

Oh, wow. Great CPU, congrats!

I was using 130MHz PCIe clock on the DFI with that Sempron 145 some years ago. Not too confident it actually did anything, but the card can handle it no problem.

Matched the model number, nice!

What do you mean? PSU is a modern one, haven't hooked my 3.3V rail-modded one yet. VIO is 3.8 for these submissions.

I have added it in version 1.31. All BIOSes have this voltage, it was just not displayed in older ZenTimings versions.

I only have 3. Ordered last year and received recently. This one seemed to POST a little higher than the other 2, but I haven't tested them yet, apart from that.

It is really hard to understand what you are asking. It is not needed to have equal VDDIO, VDDQ and VDD. They also depend on CPU and memory sticks. For VDDIO people usually stay in the 1.30 - 1.40V range. VDDQ and VDD are not displayed correctly in ZenTimings when high voltage mode is enabled.

That is a great CPU, indeed!

Yes, the 0516s and 0530s are all good cold, if I'm not wrong, need to test them properly some time in the future. I've only tested single benchmarks for competitions. the FX53 is untested, but that's all I have - just one.

These are my s.939 FX, never found a cheap FX-60 when I was adding to my collection and now it is too late, I guess. Should have bought long time ago and maybe more 55s and 57s. ADAFX53DEP5AS CAAXC 0433MPMW Clawhammer ADAFX55DEI5AS CAA2C 0509FPMW Clawhammer ADAFX55DEI5AS CAA2C 0512RPMW Clawhammer ADAFX55DAA5BN CABCE 0516MPM San Diego E4 ADAFX55DAA5BN CABCE 0516WPMW San Diego E4 ADAFX57DAA5BN CABNE 0530APMW San Diego E4 ADAFX57DAA5BN CABNE 0530APMW San Diego E4 The FX55 Clawhammer I tested ( CAA2C 0512RPMW) validated 4050 according to my notes, but it seems I have never uploaded it. Not that the batches would be very helpful, these days you get whatever you can find.

Here are several reasons - he has a 4K, he wants to use it - to piss off @unityofsaints (bonus points - there is BM on the screenshot) - everything in 'Murica is big - because why not Jokes aside, sometimes I bench on my main monitor (2K), just because it is more convenient, especially if it is the current 24/7 system and I'm benching on the chiller. And main reason - because I am lazy.

Is your monitor for ants? :p You can always right-click on the image, then open in new tab and zoom in.

NB PLL voltage (NB/PCI-e/PLL Voltage Control on Gigabyte) helps.

Is the vcore unlocked?

Here you can find links to many bios versions, link to 1202 is still working: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19gqxeeAdUmkwgE0EvH4MlJ7meeDbEHYP-FHYW-PMyOk/edit#gid=522016589

@chispy Here you go, uploaded everything I have for that card, including the GPUTweak: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1zjNjpkBbChOASw7luWiiXTS9yA2JH08_?usp=sharing PS: Some of the files are probably for the PowerColor card I had back then, but I think it was just a reference with a different cooler.