mr.paco

Thank you

Ticket ID: 1476 Priority: Medium Could you please add this GT 430 PCI, there are 2 other category's for a GT 430 but they are both PCI-E 16x. I have this one: http://www.zotacusa.com/geforce-gt-430-zt-40605-10l.html CPUZ: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2280378 GPUZ: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/ku3sh/ If you need more info please let me know. Thank you...

You can ask one of the mods to ad your Abit AN52 motherboard to the data base before just submitting it as a AN8

No s423, Abit TH7 Raid ?

Thanx SebaS, will be trying what I can from there n see how it works out. I gotta walk before I can run with the Big Boyz

Thank you. I mainly was focusing on my storage configurations for starters,still more work left to do on that. Then I will be working on other areas as I try different things.

Nice one...

Very nice work...

Thats just fine with me, thats the main reason why I let you know of the 2 names to let you decide whats best Thank you

Ticket ID: 1457 Priority: Medium Could you please add this motherboard: CPUZ shows it as "PEGATRON CORPORATION model 2A72h" an HP branding of course. BUT The board actually has M2N68-LA (narra3) written on it, thats an Asus Thank you

OK, Thank you...

BUG: Was looking to rerun my Pentium-M 730 and saw that when clicking on the various leaders for the various benchmarks under "Worldrecord (HWP)" they are all not even s479, they are all Pentium-3 1.3 or 1.4 s370: http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_m_730/ Something you guys may want to look into & fix when you have the time as it may not be just limited to this one. Be well...

Ah, OK. Thank you very much

Very very nice Bones

Sure no problem; MOBILE: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/vxump/ DESKTOP: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/89crm/ Let me know if you need anything else?

Nice...

Ticket ID: 1453 Priority: Low Are both DeskTop & Mobile versions of Intel® 4 Series Express Chip-set GPU to be submitted together? MOBILE: DESKTOP: If they are to be submitted separately in their own category; could you add the MOBILE version since there already is the DESKTOP in the data base?

Thank you...

Ticket ID: 1451 Priority: Medium Could you please add this Dell 0G919G motherboard? Thank you...

Thank you...

Ticket ID: 1446 Priority: Medium There is a category for the HD 5450 PCI-E 2.0 GDDR3 CEDAR CORE, I have the standard PCI version DDR3 PARK CORE. could you please add it. Do not know why it shows in GPUZ as 16x but its not, this server board has NO PCIe 16x slots. May be the OS (server 03) and/or driver I'm using at the moment. This is the card: http://www.hisdigital.com/us/product2-580.shtml GPUZ: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/zbnz2/ CPUZ: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=2193460 If you need me to, I can install n run it on a standard desktop with other os. Let me know. Thank you

Every BenchMark here has their own set of H/W requirements n needs to be competitive and they "ALL" have their vulnerabilities to be exploited to gain a higher score in one form or another, by a little or by a lot "UNDETECTABLE". Some folks invest their time n money on pricey GPUs for 3D benchs others on CPUs for 2D bench and in this case Storage Systems for PCMark (A-card, revo drives, I-ram, etc as well as a good gpu). And with each case you choose how much brain power you will put in to better your score/run. Some put in a lot and others just run it n forget it. You choose the arena you want to play in with what you have and what you know and you do the best you can but don't start calling FOUL if you cant score as high as the next person not knowing how to adjust/tweak a particular setting. If YOU dont like running a particular bench for what ever reason, dont use it. Sure it would be great to be ranked amongst the likes of Steve, Mtech, Pro, SAV and some others and I do have some of the HW to do it but my scores fall short, call it a lack of skill, knowledge or what ever but the point is I dont cry out ""PCM05 sucks cause "I" cant get those high scores with my 12 x I-Rams storage array; get rid of it"" As with anything in life, as time goes by you learn how to do/be better. When PcM05 first came out all of these tweaks were always there just not openly known, but as time went by folks tryed to better their scores and thus discovered what can be done. The very same thing can be said for the the other benchmarks. I dont know; to me its simply, dont get into a motorcycle race with a peddle-bike and cry "why cant I win :mad:"... Yes I'm sure there those that don't play fair with illegal actions, but to remove Pcm05 because of inability to moderate 100% accurately, then by all means line up all 28 benchmarks here and start shooting PCM05 should stay; you dont like it, dont run it. Let us that do like it play Just my 2cents... +1 As do I, mandatory since I'm in the Enthusiasts League

Giddy up; Yeah Shrimp

Great run Shrimp

Nice run Boss...