mr.paco

This is crazy. The very first point about this whole thing was if I cheated to get the score I did get. So if it was 1 I-Ram or 100 is not the point. The point is was it a lagit honest run. At this point my intrest is when the "BOT STAFF" makes their deccision, no matter YAY or NAY with what ever reason for the final decision, I would like them to make it perfectly clear here to everyone that based on my proof (video & screen shots provided) that I did not in any way deliberatly cheat on that run. Sure I'd love to have it approved but I'd rather loose the points than to ruin my shot/limited but clean reputation... Some may understand that & some may not but to all Thank you...

Yup, thats why I take the time to run em on all 3 OSs, you just never know for sure. And yes on some setups, Vista would out do XP. There are factors that play a great role, such as 32bit or 64bit cpu, single or dual core, AMD or Intel, page set up, Raid driver n so on. And at the end just hope for a good stable run (OCin Gods willing ) You get the idea Yes, same encoder #9 is the only one I use on all OSs. In fact that WIN7 run was done at just about the same OC as my original XP run. Different effects with different OSs. I dont know why :confused:but it is Sure it happens, like I said it depends on the chip, your set up n so on. Its not easy, I get results with XP Startup n HDD General Usage at way over 300+ and sometimes the other way around with 000.042mb/s . If I do find myself with more I-Rams than needed, My team mates would come first but after that your the first one Christian

Thank You & the bot staff very much for your time n help.

Here it is Sweet. I dont know how to put the image right in the post. Let me know if the image size is good or not. If if it is too small, please let me know how else to get it to you. Thank you...

I know the XP start up is over in that win7 run, it was only to show compared results vs the XP run. Wasnt meant for a submission.

Hello Sweet. I have no problem at all running it again. Setting it back up now... Sorry the WIN7 picture was too small, I didnt know how to attach an image here. See if this one is better.

Yes just to see what my run would look like under a different OS, I reran the same chip under WIN7 32bit with just about the same OC. From what I have learned here and @ home (CP) it would be a toss up when running PCM05 on a 64bit chip between WIN XP & VISTA with WIN7 giving the worst results for Transparent Windows & maybe some other subtests. I have included a screen shot of the new run on WIN7, pleas feel free to look it over & give your opinions. Like I said before; I made my run true, legit and honest to the best of my abilities with nothing forbidden. Its just one of those cases where you get just that right piece of hardware or have it set up just right where all the components just click together or the OCin Gods are with you, who knows, I just know I made an honest run. And I can rerun it again n again if you like. I have no problem with that at all, but TELLING you & SHOWING you are two different things. Just tell me what would you need me to do. Yes I ALWAYS run my PCM05 on all 3 OS (XP, VISTA, WIN7) And you are wrong in one thing, WIN7 gives the WORST run of the 3 OSs for Transparent Windows. In fact WIN7 gives the worst scores period compared to XP & VISTA. For "ME" From "MY" tests. I use the I-Rams for the Bench HD tests. How would I test the scaling on the subtets? I'd be more than happy to if you could tell me how or what you mean. I am more than happy to give you any proof you request, Just let me know how to supply it to you and you got it. Thank you Steve **And Thank you to everyone for your help n support in helping to clear this confusion up... I enjoy OCing/Benching, I gain nothing from trying to cheat. I will only end up cheating myself and hurting my team.

So if it was run under VISTA, there would have been no issue with my Transparent Windows? Thats interesting, I make all my PCMark runs on XP,VISTA & Win7 and keep my best run from the 3. I dont know what you mean by an unknown tweak, I just OC my GPU, CPU, Ram and go. As for the Audio & Video compression. I made no special adjustments. No changes were made, or replaced. I use Encoder9. And the only score limit I see in the rule is on WIN XP Start up of 220mb/s. And you got me on POWERTOY, I have no idea what that is (and please no one tell me to google it, I dont need to know what it is if its not allowed) The only thing I can say is I made a clean legit run.

I would really like to know why it would be a bugged run. If there is something wrong with it; What n Why.

Thank you very much, and believe me it was not easy at all...

Uh-Oh The III strikes again Nice...

It appears it had to do with the size of my images I try'ed to upload. Seams to have worked after resizing my pics. Please disregard my last post, it was my error, sorry...

Thanx Boss, will keep going...

Ticket ID: 1298 Priority: High I am trying to make submissions in the Bot June Competition, but every time I try I get the following \"OOPS\" error:\r\n\r\nOops. Something went wrong.\r\n\r\nWe could blame this on you but it\'s most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this.\r\nDetails:\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.MaxUploadSizeExceededException: Maximum upload size of 5000000 bytes exceeded; nested exception is org.apache.commons.fileupload.FileUploadBase$SizeLimitExceededException: the request was rejected because its size (8404729) exceeds the configured maximum (5000000)\r\nStack trace:\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.commons.CommonsMultipartResolver.parseRequest(CommonsMultipartResolver.java:159)\r\norg.springframework.web.multipart.commons.CommonsMultipartResolver.resolveMultipart(CommonsMultipartResolver.java:138)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.checkMultipart(DispatcherServlet.java:887)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doDispatch(DispatcherServlet.java:750)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.DispatcherServlet.doService(DispatcherServlet.java:719)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.processRequest(FrameworkServlet.java:644)\r\norg.springframework.web.servlet.FrameworkServlet.doPost(FrameworkServlet.java:560)\r\njavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:710)\r\njavax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.invoke(ApplicationDispatcher.java:630)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.processRequest(ApplicationDispatcher.java:436)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.doForward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:374)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher.forward(ApplicationDispatcher.java:302)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.NormalRewrittenUrl.doRewrite(NormalRewrittenUrl.java:195)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.handleRewrite(RuleChain.java:159)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.RuleChain.doRules(RuleChain.java:141)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriter.processRequest(UrlRewriter.java:90)\r\norg.tuckey.web.filters.urlrewrite.UrlRewriteFilter.doFilter(UrlRewriteFilter.java:417)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.hwbot.web.filter.LocaleFilter.doFilter(LocaleFilter.java:155)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.hwbot.web.filter.CookieFilter.doFilter(CookieFilter.java:173)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.HiddenHttpMethodFilter.doFilterInternal(HiddenHttpMethodFilter.java:77)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:76)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.CharacterEncodingFilter.doFilterInternal(CharacterEncodingFilter.java:88)\r\norg.springframework.web.filter.OncePerRequestFilter.doFilter(OncePerRequestFilter.java:76)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)\r\norg.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:433)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:128)\r\norg.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)\r\norg.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)\r\norg.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:286)\r\norg.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler.invoke(JkCoyoteHandler.java:190)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest.invoke(HandlerRequest.java:283)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.invoke(ChannelSocket.java:767)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket.processConnection(ChannelSocket.java:697)\r\norg.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket$SocketConnection.runIt(ChannelSocket.java:889)\r\norg.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:690)\r\njava.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) \r\n\r\nI\ I've tryed it with IE 7, 8, 9 & FireFox. Any help would be greatly appriciated.\r\nThank You...

Nice run Shrimp...

Yeah, I know I-Rams give nothing for PCM04. Gotta push the cpu. Still trying

Ok understood. I will resubmit my request at a later date. Thank you...

I saw that but I wasnt sure because it stated 4500HD. Now I know. Thank you

Ticket ID: 1286 Priority: Medium could you please add this motherboard:\r\nDell 0M017G\r\n\r\nhttp://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1850768\r\n\r\nThank you...

Ticket ID: 1285 Priority: Medium Could you please add this GPU? I looked around Bot but cant find if it is here to make a submission. If it is here & I over looked it, could you pont me in the right direction?\r\n\r\nIntel G45/G43 32MB/64BIT\r\nManufacture: DELL\r\n\r\nGPUZ link: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/aw6k9/\r\nCPUZ link: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1850768\r\n\r\nThank you...

Thank You

Ticket ID: 1279 Priority: Medium I am not sure if this card is to be submitted it in the area you have now but the version I have is 64BIT & 64MB the catagory submissions there now have 128BIT & 128MB.\r\nIf not could you add this card?\r\n\r\nATI Mobility Radeon X300\r\n\r\nGPUZ VALIDATION: http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/hfdy7/\r\n\r\nCPUZ VALIDATION: \r\n\r\nIf something else is needed, please let me know.\r\nThank you for you help n time...

Thank you ...

Ticket ID: 1277 Priority: Medium Could you please add this eMachine motherboard\r\nHM50-YK\r\n\r\n\r\nThank you for your help n time...

Youre the man Turrican... Thank you